Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ground Zero Settlement and the double 33

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 06:31 PM
Original message
Ground Zero Settlement and the double 33
Edited on Thu Jun-10-10 06:42 PM by spooked911
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Spooked you are amazing
After browsing your 33 blog, I had an epiphany of sorts

111 111 111 is another way to express three threes or 33.

If you assume 111111111 is a binary number and convert it to decimal you get 511.

5+1+1 = 7. And 7 is the total number of WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11.

Dude keep digging.

I stil want you to train me in your ways.




Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cloudbase Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Old 33 gets around.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. thanks again Spooked!
I will let someone else ask you if there is any conspiracy so goofy that even you wouldn't embrace it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Embrace it, I think Spooked invented this conspiracy theory.
Spooked, is this your fertile mind at work, or had it been around for a while?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Naw... the "33" fixation comes from freemasonry nutjobs
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Wow, the woo is knee deep
I liked this

Occultists the world over believe that, once a symbol is created, it acquires power of its own, and more power is generated when such symbol(s) are created without the profane knowing about it. And, the greatest power of all is created in the symbol(s) if the uninitiated NEVER discover that the symbol exists

So the most powerful symbols are those that no one knows are symbols. Very cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. So....
What does this signify?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. as I said, the double 33 is likely code
presumably having to do with the PTB and nuclear destruction of the WTC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. yeah...
and that has what to do with lawyers fees going down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. "likely"..."presumably"...
Why the "weasel words", Spooked? Do you know what you're talking about or not?

Oh, wait...I just answered my own question. Nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. I *know* that 33 is important--
but, no I can't *prove* the 33 was code in this piece. Nonetheless, I have strong suspicions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. "strong suspicions."
No evidence as usual, but strong suspicions.
Have you ever convinced anyone that you know what you are talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I asked him about that before
Edited on Sat Jun-12-10 04:23 PM by jberryhill
He says that nobody in his family, including his alleged wife, or his alleged co-workers are interested in it.

So, he posts it here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. yeah, but he has to be fun at parties
Spooked, you have an open invitation to come over for a BBQ if you are ever in Venice, CA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. One third

Spooked, do you really not get that the reference is to 1/3?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Make7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. "You can't go out into space... with fractions."
 
You can't go out into space... with fractions. What are you gonna land on? One-quarter? Three-eighths?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5JXrP8yv8o   (0:38)

One-third? What are you going to tell us next? Twenty-five percent refers to some other "fraction"?
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Spooked, can I please have your response to this...

http://www.tba.org/lawbytes/t1_1005.html

However, generally speaking, a one-third contingency fee is the customarily accepted percentage that a lawyer will be paid from your award.


http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cos79.htm

The contingency fee percentage varies and some lawyers offer a sliding scale based on how far along the case is when it is settled. A one-third fee is common


But your belief is that the New York Times has some arrangement with a secret network to publish the number "33" in their stories in order to.... do what? Communicate what to whom? Doesn't this secret network already know they blew up the towers? But they need to hide this fact in some numeric code in an article about a settlement years after the event?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. response
1) there is no doubt that 33 has special significance and is used as code, read the articles in the 33-watch blog

2) the article didn't say "one-third", it had "33.33"-- which is notable for two 33's, and is an unusual way of writing "one-third".

3) the PTB definitely like to secretly boast about what they did, and further, the 33 may be an indication that the PTB controlled the outcome of the judgement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. "controlled the outcome of the judgment"

Do you really not know the difference between a judgment and a settlement?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I'm sorry I used the wrong word.
Not sure why you need to ask if I "really" don't know the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. So, you meant to say "controlled the settlement"

What sense does that make? By definition a settlement is an outcome to which the parties have agreed.

So, you are saying that someone had the NYT print "33.33%" as a common decimal approximation of one third in order to boast, secretly, that nukes were used. Is that correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. the 33 is clearly important, and indicates control of some sort
and the 33 here may indicate a nuclear matter. The double 33 may indicate that both sides of the settlement were controlled.

Note the quote: "Under the new accord, the plaintiffs’ lawyers have agreed to reduce their fees to a maximum of 25 percent of the settlement amount, down from the 33.33 percent..."

They don't write 25.00%, do they? But they wrote 33.33...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. A quarter works out to a nice round number, a third doesn't

But people have more trouble understanding fractions than percentages.

You really believe that just because the reporter expressed those fractions as percentages that some shadowy figure commanded they be reported that way? Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. "the article didn't say "one-third", it had "33.33"
"which is notable for two 33's, and is an unusual way of writing "one-third"."
Seriously, Spooked?
You HAVE to be some sort of performance artist or Andy Kaufman himself, right?
I really see no other explanation for all the goofy stuff you post.
And it keeps getting GOOFIER!
Keep digging, Spooked. You're almost there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Spooked, you may have outdone yourself
This could be your best thread ever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. Spooked...
I am just worried about what will happen once the post count in this thread reaches 33. Will the PTB "likely" blow up DU? Will they "presumably" do it with mini-nukes? Will we have to clear the area? Will we have to sign up with DU all over again?

I am frightened, Spooked! Please step up and be the leader we all know you can be. We need you, Spooked...now, more than ever. Oh, please, please answer our pleas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I too am worried about the post count
I just hope I am not #33!
Although 15 is even worse!
I can't get into it, but 15 is not a number you want to be!
So, try and avoid it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. oh no...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. LOLOL...
you crack me up, Z-man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. You should avoid anything under 18 in most states /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC