Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sharp-dressed man aided terror suspect Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab onto plane without passport

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
jakeXT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 01:29 PM
Original message
Sharp-dressed man aided terror suspect Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab onto plane without passport


Flight 253 passenger: Sharp-dressed man aided terror suspect Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab onto plane without passport (MLive.com exclusive)
By Sheena Harrison | MLive.com
December 26, 2009, 2:22PM

Kurt Haskell

Kurt Haskell's boarding pass for NWA Flight 253

A Michigan man who was aboard Northwest Airlines Flight 253 says he witnessed Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab trying to board the plane in Amsterdam without a passport.

Kurt Haskell of Newport, Mich., who posted an earlier comment about his experience, talked exclusively with MLive.com and confirmed he was on the flight by sending a picture of his boarding pass. He and his wife, Lori, were returning from a safari in Uganda when they boarded the NWA flight on Friday.
Kurt Haskell

Lori and Kurt Haskell
Haskell said he and his wife were sitting on the ground near their boarding gate in Amsterdam, which is when they saw Mutallab approach the gate with an unidentified man.

...


http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2009/12/flight_253_passenger_says_at_l.html


nothing to see here....
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. "nothing to see here...."
Do you have any evidence that someone is trying to cover up this piece of information?

Hint: a big daily in the United States that talks about this is a strange way to try and cover up the information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jakeXT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. reminds me of the liquid bomb plot


None of the alleged terrorists had made a bomb. None had bought a plane ticket. Many did not even have passports, which given the efficiency of the UK Passport Agency would mean they couldn't be a plane bomber for quite some time.

In the absence of bombs and airline tickets, and in many cases passports, it could be pretty difficult to convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt that individuals intended to go through with suicide bombings, whatever rash stuff they may have bragged in internet chat rooms.

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0815-36.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
procopia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. "A" big daily reports it, so there was no suppression?
What other news sources reported this story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Well, it's kind of hard to say it's been suppressed when the link to the story is right there.
It was an exclusive for the paper. The reporter interviewed the passenger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
procopia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "Suppressed" doesn't mean "never reported at all."
A Google news search finds this source and one or two minor news sources reporting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "Suppressed" doesn't mean "not as widely reported as I would like," either.
"Suppressed" implies, oh, I don't know, some actual suppression?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. let me know when you hear this on CNN or FoxNews
and also when you get a clue
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Hint: "suppression" is not defined "not as widely reported as I would like"
Until you have actual evidence of suppression, all you have is speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. just because u insist on keeping your head in the sand
I am not sure why u insist on hanging out here and shoving everyone else's head down too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jakeXT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
24. it was on cnn
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x417930


But so was the King family on ABC once talking how the gov killed mlk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. link didn't work
but good to know. A lot of times these kinds of stories are reported once, then they fall down the "memory hole" and are never talked about again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bullshit

I've flown out of Schiphol a bunch of times.

Passport control is nowhere near the boarding gates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KDLarsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Stop the presses! A sharply-dressed man!
Seriously, are the standards that low, that airline/airport employees stand out because they're sharply dressed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. At Amsterdam? I doubt he would get on without a passport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Get on? He wouldn't even get to the international gate area without one /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lithos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just a question for people to answer
How does this relate to the well reported fact of his traveling on a US supplied visa? They obviously knew who he was when he was on the plane, meaning that the ticket and the id used to obtain it matched. Seems a bit incongruous.

L-
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jakeXT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Britain refused a visa but the US didn't
Edited on Mon Dec-28-09 06:11 AM by jakeXT
Dutch police investigate terror plot accomplice

heraldscotland staff


Published on 28 Dec 2009

Dutch military police are investigating the possibility that an accomplice may have helped the Nigerian man accused of trying to blow up a flight from Amsterdam to Detroit on Christmas Day.

..
The military police have already said Abdulmutallab did not go through passport control at Schiphol when he arrived from Lagos.

...
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/world-news/dutch-police-investigate-terror-plot-accomplice-1.994745




A fresh British visa request was refused in May after he applied for a bogus course, Whitehall sources said
http://www.breakingnews.ie/world/video-clip-warned-of-fresh-terror-attack-439774.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. verily, the story stinks
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Perhaps the stupidest ever from the Anonymous Physicist
My favorite part is at the very end:

"Indeed the use of many small nuclear devices, emplaced in those towers, may have revealed the ultimate reasons for getting much of Mankind to live and/or work in large buildings, and in large cities…"

WTF? heh, just frighteningly stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. No, it is not stupid, if you are awake.
"The Family Guy", however, is mind-numbingly dumb. There's probably a connection there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. ahh, the truthers second favorite accusation
The first, of course, being that you support repugs if you don't buy the tinfoil. Now though, your going to the second string where one is asleep... not paying attention because they don't buy into stupid shit like AP puts out. Seriously, a couple hundred years ago some shadowy group that controls everything (while never being found out) convinces people to live in cities, live and work in large building... for the purpose of using mini nukes that by some miracle look nothing like nukes, act nothing like nukes and leave no traces of nukes being used... Seriously... you buy stupid shit like that? Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
procopia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Straw man, the OCTists' favorite tactic
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 01:07 PM by procopia
Just because one side observation made by the writer seems illogical to you, does that mean there are no valid points in the gist of the article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. There are many stupid items in the "article"
I only mentioned one. The general gist of it is to blather about these shadowy all powerful invisible people that control everything with zero cites for the claims made and zero evidence, it is complete non-sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
procopia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. But you didn't specify any of them...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. No, I did not
Read the non-sense for yourself. It is paranoid bullshit and I very specific ly stated I was only mentioning the stupidest part. If you wish to ignore the massive leaps made to come up with that drivel, you are free to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Playing dumb, the truther's favorite tactic. n/t
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 02:31 PM by AZCat
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
procopia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. projection--
a common OCTist mechanism. Thanks for the example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Generally speaking...
when you point to an example it should actually reflect your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. it would fit if he was a patsy
and they are putting out all sorts of stories on him to mislead and confuse
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
netsurfer2 Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. He was a patsy
For Al Queda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
procopia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Confirmed?
By whom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. "Al Queda"?
wow, never saw that version of the name.

Anyway, al Qaeda is really al-CIA-duh, hope you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KDLarsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Not that there's any evidence of that at all..
.. but hey, since when has that stopped twoofers from declaring something proven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Don Caballero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. Such utter BS
Every time something like this happens the conspiracy theory crowd comes out in full force. Who do they work for? Why are they always distracting from the facts with conspiracy theory garbage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. the original post WAS based on facts
not sure why you think it is BS. Why are you so angry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
procopia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. Because the really sane people believe
the "war on terror" is just about keeping Americans safe, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sylvi Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. OMG! ZZ Top is in on it, too!(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #17
41. I'm glad I wasn't the only one who thought that
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HannibalCards Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Be on the lookout
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Their beards would be the envy of all AQ
If they were darker and not famous, I wonder if they could even get on a plane with those things :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
netsurfer2 Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
26. Confirmed?
Has this been confirmed as fact? Or is this just another story that apperas on the net with no basis in fact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MinM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. Passengers on Detroit Flight Witness Accomplice and Passenger Video
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
37. verrrrry interesting
A sharp dressed man? Maybe like the men in black who show up after UFO encounters? Could the two be related?
A sharp dressed man makes me think of the CIA or some sort of black ops.
Let's keep asking the important questions like...
1. What part of our government did he work for?
2. Has he ever been seen near any unusual activities such as crop circles, ufo sightings or 9/11?
3. Or if he isn't part of our government, then he is Mossad and we should be asking Israel some serious questions.
Keep on it guys!
Good work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sancho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. two lawyers interviewed on npr....
saw and described the man in detail: Indian or Pakistan; 50's, etc. He helped the bomber board without a passport. The witnesses were a married couple, both lawyers, one used to work for the US Gov. A third passenger with two adopted kids were required to have passports. The "older man" spoke to a supervisor to gain boarding without a passport when the gate worker did not allow boarding. The witnesses were interviewed by the FBI.

Seemed like credible witnesses, and maybe there are tapes of the "older man".

I heard the interview on the radio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC