Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Omar bin Laden

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 08:38 PM
Original message
Omar bin Laden
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/18/osama-bin-laden-son-interview

"In the book, he goes on to say that while he initially refused to believe that his father was involved in the attack on the World Trade Center in New York, this view eventually changed: "Only much later, when he took personal credit for the attacks, did I know I must give up the luxury of doubt. That was the moment to set aside the dream that I had indulged, feverishly hoping that the world was wrong and it was not my father who brought about that horrible day. After hearing an audiotape of my father's own words taking credit for the attacks, I faced the reality that he was the perpetrator behind the events of September 11, 2001. This knowledge drives me into the blackest hole."

Wow, gives me new respect for the truthers, they can see right through the obvious fake that fools even Osama'a son... simply amazing.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Torn_Scorned_Ignored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. The very same
Osama that was on the CIA payroll I assume.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't think I would call it "on the payroll"
I think there is some evidence he accepted US help back when the Russians were in Afghanistan though but yeah, that Osama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. of course OBL also denied being connected to 9/11
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

"The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its enemies attack it. I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons."





Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KDLarsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. And yet...
Here's what Hamid Mir had to say about the very same statement:
I was not ready to say that bin Laden is involved in the <9/11> attacks. You see, I was questioning the assumption that he is involved. When I visited Afghanistan, I spent some days there, I was totally changed because I saw the pictures of Atta hanging in the hideouts. Privately they admitted everything. They said, they are our brothers, but they said that “When the Americans kill Muslims in Sudan, they don’t admit that we are responsible for the attacks. When the Indians kill Kashmiris, they don’t admit that we have killed them. So now this is our turn. We have killed them and we are not going to admit that.
My tape recorder was on and one very important al Qaeda leader he turned off my tape recorder and said, “Yes, I did it. Okay. Now play your tape recorder.” I played the tape recorder and he said “No, I’m not responsible”.
Hamid Mir interview with Peter Bergen, Islamabad, May 11 2002 and March 2005. Chapter 10, The Osama bin Laden I Know, Peter L Bergen

Hell, in just about every other tape/interview after that denial , either he or another known member of AQ dropped hints at his involvement: http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Responsibility
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. okay - just pointing out that both yes and no have been said
Edited on Sun Nov-22-09 01:01 PM by RedSock
i'm not making a claim that he was not involved, i'm was simply pointing out that he has also publicly denied it.

like everything regarding 9/11, there are *at least* two "official" stories.

in terms of the military defense response, there are at least 7!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. And yet, the US maintained 'intimate relations' with OBL
all the way up until 9/11, despite being wanted for the murder of American citizens in the USS Cole and embassy bombings?


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KDLarsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. And yet they didn't
Got any evidence of that? Or rather, should I ask if Sibel Edmonds still haven't got any evidence of that allegation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, they did
Sibel Edmond's allegation is corroborated by intelligence specialist John M. Cole, who is an 18 year FBI veteran. Both are members of National Security Whistleblowers Coalition.


Sibel Edmonds and John Cole interview, Oct. 23, 2009

http://original.antiwar.com/scott/2009/11/01/fbi-whistleblower-names-names/
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Was this UBL's reincarnation?
thought he was dead
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm not sure I understand
This is not about any new messages, it is his son talking about old ones. I suspect he is dead now myself (though I am aware of no real evidence one way or the other) but I'm pretty sure he was alive back at the time frame referenced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. There's no proof
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. So...
You don't think the son would recognize his fathers voice? I know I would recognize my fathers voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I think 'he speak with forked tongue'
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. ahhh, I see
He is in on it as well. Fascinating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I wouldn't trust any of them
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
icee2 Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Which UBL did you think was dead?

The fat one, the skinny one, the Sim one, or some other one? There aren't quite as many Usamas as there are #2 al Qaeda leaders, but
there's still a bunch of 'em that can be trotted out on demand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. the skinny one with the cloth wrapped round his head
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC