|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-23-09 01:01 PM Original message |
Missing Steel... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-23-09 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. That piece of steel has always been at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
szatmar666 (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 09:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. the steel that's really missing is in the pieces |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 09:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. No, that steel is not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
szatmar666 (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. what a big fat non-sequitur! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Why would anyone need to model the ACTUAL COLLAPSE SEQUENCE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
szatmar666 (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 12:05 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. perhaps in ballet and busshit school that's all you need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 12:06 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. NIST did prove their point beyond your feeble personal incredulity. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 12:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Wouldn't you model it to make sure it behaves the way the model says it will? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 12:22 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Not the actual collapse sequence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 12:29 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. But what if the top section did not fall the way it did in the video? Wouldn't that tell .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 12:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. How do you know it didn't? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 12:44 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Nobody knows because they did not model it. If i developed a vacine I would not.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
szatmar666 (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 12:38 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. THERE IS NO MODEL OF THE PANCAKE THEORY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 01:17 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. You understand the pancake explanation of how the collapses started is no longer operative, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
szatmar666 (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 01:42 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. read the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 02:09 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I read the article - back in 2005. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 09:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Hmmm. That's not what I remember the NIST report saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 09:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I am not at all surprised about that either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 09:40 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Exactly - it's not that interesting of a engineering question. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovepg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-07-09 10:22 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. The question that would be answered is, IS YOUR MODEL CORRECT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-08-09 12:26 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. dumbassed to the extreme"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-08-09 11:33 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I am very sorry that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
szatmar666 (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-08-09 11:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Is it more complex than the FEA modeling of the entire Earth's Climate Balance?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 01:01 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. I see you think the buildings collapsed into their own footprint. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
szatmar666 (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 01:48 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I see, so you have nothing to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 02:12 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. What an interesting way of admitting you are wrong about a basic factual issue. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
szatmar666 (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 05:01 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. you are obviously deluded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:23 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Even if I gave you that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
szatmar666 (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:28 AM Response to Reply #17 |
24. again: you are refering to the structural impact damage models |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC