Do you believe what you can see with your own eyes?

[wildbilln864]

Or do you believe what you've been told? :smoke:

[Realityhack]

1. Oh please.

You keep telling us not to believe what we saw broadcast... it was all CG. Gota go through all kinds of hoops analyzing what is there. Look at this shadow, listen to this one guy...
Unless it is building 7. Then we should just go with whatever our first thought is when shown a leading series of images ending with broadcast footage of bldg 7 right? No need for analysis we took one look and we are done investigating.

Fuck that shit Bill. Some of us have minds we like to use once in a while.

[Ghost in the Machine]

2. "Some of us have minds we like to use once in a while. "

You know, *that* just might be the problem.... because the rest of us like to use our minds all the time... you should try it...

[Realityhack]

3. What a cutting rebuttal of the fact that....

Bill is explicitly asking us NOT to think.

[Ghost in the Machine]

4. This is about *your* comment, nothing to do with Bill... please try to follow along better...

You make it too easy, just like this one:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=253794&mesg_id=254599

[Realityhack]

6. No as usual it is about a small aspect of my post.

And you playing a word game with it.

You made a cute little comment about a non-substantive part of my post. Good for you. Very funny.

You did not address the issue that I raised only the way in which I did so. Thus you have, as usual, contributed nothing to the discussion.

[jakeXT]

5. I need my glasses

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9005367754264973286

[Kalun D]

7. Incriminating

Building 7 is the most incriminating event of 911.

I think flight 93 was supposed to take out building 7, but since it was delayed 42 minutes it would have made the defense stand-down glaringly obvious.

More than anything building 7 looked like a controlled demolition. Therefore if you really wanted to know what really happened you would have to examine the evidence. BUT the evidenced was removed and disposed of. Therefore you have to assume they did not want us to know what really happened.

They say it wasn't a controlled demolition but they did not examine the evidence to prove the statement.

[vincent_vega_lives]

8. flight 93 was supposed to take out building 7,

The Pentagon, WTC towers and...Building 7.

Nope not the Capital building nor the White house but the FAR more important WTC building 7. Right.

Have you considered that Flight 93 was headed for DC and not NYC?

[Realityhack]

9. Please do not confuse people with the facts.

It isn't nice to point out that they lack basic reasoning skills and/or are ignoring the facts.

[frog92969]

10. Because neither the Capital building or the White House were demolished?

I also suspect WTC7 was the target of a plane that never arrived.
Maybe not 93, many planes were grounded.

[Bolo Boffin]

11. Perhaps you should check out the phrase "begging the question". n/t

[frog92969]

12. There is no question

The demolition of WTC7 is not debatable.
Anyone who says it is is either stuck in a fantasy or completely dishonest.

[SDuderstadt]

13. What bullshit.....

to assert that WTC7 is "not debatable" is called, in Logic, "psychic foreclosure". WTC 7 is entirely debatable and to suggest that anyone who doesn't believe it was brought down by "controlled demolition" or whatever you're suggesting is "dishonest" is a despicable tactic.

[frog92969]

14. I know you've seen the videos

Don't you believe your own eyes?
Or do you want me to disbelieve mine?
If so, why would you want me to disbelieve mine? I think that's the relevant question.

I'm not new to "The Dungeon" and I must say I find your posts...interesting.

[SDuderstadt]

17. You mean the videos of the collapse of WTC7 that:

1) Don't even start until well AFTER the penthouse has already fallen
2) Don't show the bottom third of the building
3) Don't have a soundtrack so you can't hear that the deafening explosions that accompany controlled demolition are totally missing in the case of WTC7

Those videos?

[Realityhack]

15. ROTFLMFAO!!

>>Perhaps you should check out the phrase "begging the question". n/t
>There is no question

Did that seriously just happen?

Fist bump for Bolo
:fistbump:

[wildbilln864]

16. You think the White house was a more important target than #7...

Why? Which would be the most desired target out of the following?
WTC #7, The White House, or George W. Bush. Which would you pick?

[KDLarsen]

18. The Capitol Building of course

That way the terrorists would have achieved the trifecta of hitting the symbols of the Economic, Military and Political power of the US.

Also, how exactly would any plane be able to hit WTC7? Unlike WTC1+2, there are/were several building around WTC7 at approximately the same hight, making it extremely difficult to maneuvre into a position where you could "score" a direct hit.

[frog92969]

19. I'd say much easier than broadsiding the Pentagon -

[wildbilln864]

21. So you don't think the POTUS...

would be a prime target candidate!? :shrug:

[frog92969]

20. I would pick door number three

But that's just personal preference.
:evilgrin:

[wildbilln864]

22. me too! nt

[defendandprotect]

23. DEMOLITION . . and according to demolition experts consulted . . .

they couldn't duplicate the "highly sophisticated" and "innovative" work -- !!!

They thought it was "military" operation --

[SDuderstadt]

24. Name them, D&P....

otherwise this is just more of your absolute bullshit.