|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 06:54 PM Original message |
Ever notice the odd fires and broken windows of Building 7? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. And the south side was almost pristine by comparison... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 07:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. If there were fires and shattered windows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 07:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. There were fires and shattered windows on the south side. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 07:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Pics? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 07:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Pics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 07:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. That's not the south side /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 08:10 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Yes, it is. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. It most certainly is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 07:23 AM Response to Reply #9 |
58. Time to admit you are wrong. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
5. Oooh oooh, I know.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 07:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Explain please. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 07:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Draw on your diagram.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 07:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. That makes sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 08:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Yes, and they took photographs.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:06 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Ok, my original question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:13 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. "Can heat from the fire make them shatter?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:15 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Unfortunately, he's not joking... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:20 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. I am asking reasonable questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:33 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Asking why oven tempered glass is not used for office windows is not reasonable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
52. You think your oven has regular glass in it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:17 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. But why wouldn't they do the same for office windows? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:30 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. It's prohibitively expensive and not necessary... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. I can't get people to install windows with thermal breaks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:45 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Well harrrumph.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:54 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. You have a t-stat that goes up to 375? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:58 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Yes, all of my appliances are designed by the people who make stuff in James Bond movies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Thunderball, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:05 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Nailed it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:09 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Man this is hard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:16 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. JamesBondWiki.com |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:24 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. So it WAS Moonraker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. The purpose would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:58 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Have you watched the video I linked to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:03 PM Response to Reply #26 |
33. You know.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:10 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. I'm not saying you're wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:12 PM Response to Reply #26 |
39. That's not necessarily a good idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:21 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Hell no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:26 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Hmmm. Most commercial buildings leak ~ 0.12 cfm/sqft. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. Ok, fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:31 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. No problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:37 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Don't buy AZCat's nonsense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:41 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. LoL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:47 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. What?! That's crazy talk! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:54 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Now I don't who to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 11:09 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. In this post, I analyze conflicting appeals to authority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 07:34 AM Response to Reply #56 |
60. imaginary numbers like eleventeen? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 07:32 AM Response to Reply #53 |
59. Maybe you can get PETA to help you if you classify AIR as an animal n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Heat can be a big problem with glass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 09:11 AM Response to Reply #16 |
61. I found the PPG reference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:17 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. This video deals with the fires, the damage, and the windows. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
25. All right, all right, we failed the test, so.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:53 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. For one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 09:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Who uses explosives to set fires? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:04 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. The explosives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:09 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. So, what made the building come down? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:17 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. We won't know that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:19 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. But - wait a minute.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:27 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. What I said was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:35 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Let me make sure I have your theory nailed down here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 10:53 PM Response to Reply #49 |
54. Let me just address the first one for now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
achtung_circus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-22-09 11:53 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. So, "They can then say that Bldg 7 collapsed because Tower 1 fell on it" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 06:59 PM Response to Reply #54 |
62. Could you remind me again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 08:36 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Good question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 08:40 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. So, they destroyed WTC 1 & 2 (and other buildings)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 08:43 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. It was more like a two for one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 08:51 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. So, now your theory makes even less sense.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 08:59 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. It makes perfect sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 09:06 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Maybe to you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 09:13 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Get over it, Dorothy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-23-09 09:18 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. You don't know a fucking thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-24-09 12:09 AM Response to Reply #54 |
71. Some suggested that they had to begin bringing down the towers because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-24-09 12:11 AM Response to Reply #49 |
72. Or they were trying to make it look like "fires" were a problem in WTC7 . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-24-09 12:13 AM Response to Reply #29 |
73. You can activate the explosive/bombs from a distance -- even from a helicopter flying over . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC