Improbable Collapse : The Demolition of our Republic

[liberal4truth]

http://www.improbablecollapse.com/

“Improbable Collapse: The Demolition of Our Republic” is the first film to look at the events of September 11, 2001 from a scientific perspective.

On September 11, 2001 the World Trade Center Twin Towers disintegrated in a manner that scientists say resembled deliberately calculated implosions. The facts open for discussion include: at 5:20 p.m. that same day another building, the 47 story WTC 7, completely collapsed within 70 feet of its footprint in 6.6 seconds. These three buildings became the first such structures to ever suffer complete collapse due to fire and damage.

The film closely examines one of the world’s worst catastrophes from a civil engineering perspective. Using photo and video footage as well as expert scientific testimony, the film thoroughly examines the official reports, offering varied criticisms of the official findings, while raising a more plausible hypothesis. The findings from these scientific experts have been quietly ignored by both government investigations and the mainstream media.


More at:

http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Why%20Indeed%20Did%20the%20WTC%20Buildings%20Completely%20Collapse%20Jones%20Thermite%20World%20Trade%20Center%20J24.pdf

[MarkyX]

1. Kevin Ryan and Steven Jones

Kevin Ryan was fired for his job because he tried to pretend to represent the company when he didn't. Let's not forget he was just a water tester and lied about what his company did.

Then there is Steven Jone who collected dust from some old lady's apartment and was not even near Ground Zero for investigation. He also has no experience with explosive devices or skyscrapers yet likes to repeat claims like Thermite is used by Controlled Demolition companies (he can't even name one company or building). He was so desperate to look legit that he had to create his own journal instead of submitting it other engineers.

Yeaaaaah, good luck with that.

[JackRiddler]

3. Hey, MarkyX, in for another hit and run?

Learn some manners. The person who provided the WTC dust from her apartment directly across the street from the Towers is not "some old lady," and if you're going to insult her, at least bother to research who she is, "angry young man."

In his open letter to Frank Gayle, which led to his firing, Kevin Ryan did not pretend to represent Underwriters Laboratory, writing only on his own behalf.

The very first news story on Kevin Ryan, Nov. 12, 2004, makes that clear:
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451

This was while he was still employed by UL: "911Truth.org called Ryan Friday to confirm his authorship. Ryan made it clear he is speaking for himself only, not on behalf of his laboratory or the company, but others at UL are aware of his action."

His functions as an executive at UL are beside the point - he was addressing claims by NIST and by UL with regard to a test undertaken by UL.

---

So. How come you never responded on the following thread?

http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x194011#194200

Yeaaaaah, good luck with that.

[Bolo Boffin]

4. The lady who provided the dust samples with the welder-artist boyfriend?

**sigh** Oh, there's no way there could be contamination of that dust. :eyes:

And the Ryan letter to NIST doesn't make clear what Ryan had to. That's why he got fired. He mispresented his views as the views of his company in that letter. Fired.

He sued and the case was thrown out of court with prejudice.

[Bolo Boffin]

2. This video is one more example of the clueless 9/11 Truth movement.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x172242

That's my detailed debunking when this video first got posted here. Sheesh.