Trailer for "The Pentagon Flyover: How They Pulled It Off"

[Twist_U_Up]

Here is the trailer for our upcoming presentation that will reveal more groundbreaking evidence independently obtained by CIT. This new full length feature will show you exactly why and how they were able to pull off the Pentagon flyover and we will present new evidence proving the official black box and radar data fraudulent. Stay tuned to ThePentaCon.com for the February 2008 release of this explosive information.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBDVNuM2TbY

[nebula]

1. This should be excellent

I am looking forward to it.

[William Seger]

6. My parents have a neighbor

... who saw the plane hit. He was going west on 395, south of the Pentagon parking lot, and was about perpendicular to the flight path when he saw the last two seconds or so when the plane dove into the side of the building. He and at least a hundred or so other people on just that road were in a perfect position to see any flyover. When I told him about the "CIT" theory that the plane really flew over the building, he looked incredulous for a second or two, and then said, "They're full of shit!"

So, yes, I'm sure you'll enjoy the new video immensely.

[Mr_Jefferson_24]

8. "My parents have a neighbor"....

:rofl:

Oh yeah, well my Nana's hairdresser has a pet Chihuahua named Blinky who regularly chases a squirrel that gathers acorns in the back yard of a home owned by a guy who has a picture of a lady that saw and recognized the Global Hawk missile just before it struck the Pentagon.

Why do you even bother with your posting record? -- you have all the credibility of the former Iraqi Information Minister.

[piobair]

10. for the no planers

who say that plane crashes always leave recognizable wreckage...http://www.planecrashinfo.com/w19740303.htm

Ermenonville France 1974 Turkish DC10 crashes into the forest after a cargo door comes open. Hardly any wreckage larger than 3 ft.

[CGowen]

15. better pictures

?pic

?pic (still looks more like a plane crash compared to the first pictures of the U93 crash site)

http://www.baaa-acro.com/Photos%20d'accidents%201974.htm

[piobair]

16. I agree but

the plane in France came down through the woods and didn't impact a concrete wall. I guess the point,is that most plane crashes occur with the crew trying to avoid crashing and at lower speeds than flt77. Even a relatively low speed crash can result in near total destruction of the aircraft. There are too many variables for the no-planers to state with the certainty that they do that"there is not enough wreckage" so there couldn't have been a plane. Edit: I see you referenced flt 93 and not 77. 93 impacted almost vertically compared to the Turkish DC10 shallow descent angle.

[William Seger]

12. Awww, poor li't bullshit addicts

Here's a photo I took from the same road where he said he was when he saw the plane hit:



This is the southeast corner; the plane hit the wall around the corner on the left.

So, you don't believe his story? OK, suit yourself, but bullshit addicts don't get off quite that easy: This road was packed with cars at that time of morning, so as I said, there must have been at least a hundred people on just that one road who would have clearly seen any flyover. And the Pentagon is surrounded by roads. In the new video, the "CIT" bullshitters apparently will attempt to tell you that people were somehow "confused" about reports of another plane in the area, and just assumed that's what they saw fly over. Even though they really saw a fucking 757 fly a few feet over that roof, they were somehow "confused" when they heard (much later) that there was another plane somewhere in the area. Not a one of those people, after hearing reports of a plane crashing into the Pentagon, called the authorities to say, "No it didn't crash; it flew over and BOMBED the Pentagon!" It would be hard to find a more idiotic 9/11 theory (except of course for Judy Wood's death star). My parents' neighbor is exactly right, "They're full of shit."

You'll love it, Mr_J.

[Bolo Boffin]

13. Uh-oh, I can hear Aldo now.

The place where the plane hit is, of course, around the corner on the left. Because your friends did not actually see the aluminum strike the marble, Aldo and his CIT maniacs are going to contend that your friends did NOT see the plane hit the building.

Even though they saw the plane heading toward the building at over 500 mph and disappear behind the building. Even though they immediately thereafter saw a huge explosion. Even though, as you say, they were in the perfect position to see that plane fly over the Pentagon if it did.

Aldo and his gang of nutzoids have a way of denying every witness that claims to have seen the plane hit the building, even their own.

[William Seger]

14. Yup, that's what Lyte Trip (Craig Ranke) said

... when I told him about it on the JREF board last summer. And of course, this was an "anonymous" witness, so like all the hundreds of other witnesses who never had reports published, he can be ignored by the bullshit addicts.

[AZCat]

2. Fucking morons. n/t

[nebula]

4. That you certainly are. nt.

[Mr_Jefferson_24]

9. Aw, there, there -- is AZCat overdue for his nap?

[AZCat]

11. At the time, probably.

But it still doesn't change the fact that CIT are fucking morons.

[nebula]

17. The official story has been thoroughly decimated.

Waaaahhhhh!






Pentagon police interviewed by CIT refute the official story.

[Bolo Boffin]

3. All Aboard!

[wildbilln864]

5. yes it's hard to float that....

bullshit OCT.

[Mr_Jefferson_24]

7. Great, looking forward to it. nt.

[Sweet Pea]

18. Yep...This Oughta be Good.

What's the trailer like? I can't watch it here at work.