Even many CTers agree with that, including some on this very forum.
For instance:
petgoat Tue Jun-13-06 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Loose Change is a piece of garbage, agreed. I watched about
half of it. Good production, lousy research.
Nobody here is promoting Loose Change. It's a straw man.
I'm not a CTer but I happen to agree with that and, off the top of my head, I can think of all kinds of more examples of how and why it is a piece of garbage.
Bear in mind, these are just off the top of my head, and I haven't the time to check spelling, grammar and such or to provide the pinpoint references in the loose change film but you can go to the links below which do, and you can (and should) also conduct your own actual research as well to confirm them (that means not just relying on conspiracy theory sites like the loosechange guys do, by the way, but some real, actual, independent research).
Anyway, some examples:
It is chock full of numerous instances of unsubstantiated and unsourced assertions that any honest research could, would, should, does (and/or will) know better than to try to pass off as factual, but nope, not the loosechangers - can't let little things like truth and facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory and a few more dvd and tee shirt sales to the uninitiated and/or uninformed and/or gullible;
it is full of outdated nonsense that the lazy loosechangers have never bothered to follow up on or conduct a moment’s research on, ;
it is chock a block with all manner of dishonest “quote mining”;
it misquotes people and, even worse, dishonestly fails to note that numerous people it has misquoted or misrepresented have expressly said publicly that they were misquoted or misrepresented (including firefighters, controlled demolition experts, and the leaseholder of the WTC);
it dishonestly insinuates expertise on behalf of some of those it quotes when those individuals have no expertise in any field relevant to the topic being opined on;
it is derisive, disrespectful and downright contemptuous toward flight passenger victims and their surviving family members;
it "quotes" people whose existence is in question without ever having made any effort to locate them nor any effort to ascertain that said people even exist, let alone attempt to ascertain whether the quotes attributed to them were accurate or in context;
it totally misrepresents what the coroner in Shanksville said, saw, and did;
it completely ignores the realities of the bodies and body parts of those it calls the "alleged" victims at the Pentagon;
it relies upon an anonymous email on a message board as the sole source for at least one outrageous and unsubstantiated assertion (perhaps more) regarding its fanciful and ridiculous Cleveland plane swapping scenario;
it out and out lies about certain of the black boxes from the various flights not having been recovered;
it claims that the "alleged" passengers of Flight 93 could not possibly have made the phone calls to their families etal, and says there's "no question about it" the phone calls were "fake" (or the family members who received the calls are all lying), all on the basis of an "experiment" conducted by a professor of some sort in London, Ontario testing the efficacy of two Motorola cell phones in a Cessna (or similar) in an entirely different location many hundreds of miles away in a wholly different geographical area without any indication whatsoever that it was comparable in any way to the circumstances of any of the highjacked flights (most notably, of course, that the Cessna didn't have Airfones, which is what was used for the vast majority of the phone calls on the hijacked flights);
the loosechangers didn't interview even one individual whom they allege landed in Cleveland on the purportedly "swapped" flight 93, despite the fact that they purport to quote someone who supposedly landed there and was then shuffled off to a NASA building and either murdered by the gov't or relocated to live happily ever after since they were "in on it" and faking their own deaths and abandoning their families (note: this depends on which version of Loose Change and which other so called "truth" seekers you adhere to, apparently - the various CTers and the various versions of loosechange alternatively say that the passengers "are all alive" and were all "in on it" (as previous loosechange versions did) or they claim that the "real" planes were towed out to sea and dumped, presumably, or they claim that the passengers were all murdered by the gov't in some other fashion with no details provided at all, or they say that everyone on the planes (including the children as young as, what, 5 years old?) were deliberately chosen to be on the planes to be killed because they were all connected to some uber-plot and needed killing (oh, that's ignoring for now the loosechange makers saying that "the people are secondary", that a father "sent his little boy off to die" and such lovely gems as those, of course);
it is utterly contemptuous of the flight attendants and crew on the hijacked flights;
in one instance, it heaps ridicule and derision on one flight attendant for purportedly sounding calm while reporting the actions of the hijackers while simultaneously heaping ridicule and derision on another flight attendant for NOT sounding calm while reporting the actions of the hijackers;
it says that many of the hijackers are still alive, based entirely on a report of Sept. 2001 and has the loosechangers have not even bothered to follow the evidence that has come out for the nearly five years since then which explains and refutes that early report (though several DUers have, to their great credit);
it says that the hijackers are not on the "official autopsy list" while citing a document that is not an "official autopsy list" at all, but a list of the passengers who had been identified via DNA from one of the flights – (the families of the hijackers did not submit DNA for comparison purposes);
it says, when speaking of the response letter to an FOIA request enclosing the list of passengers identified via DNA mentioned above that "the opening paragraph does not even mention them (the hijackers)" and the loosechangers apparently still do not realize, even after several "versions" of this stupid crockumentary, that they still don't have a clue about the nature of the document they are citing or what on earth it means;
it totally misunderstands and misinterprets the issue of the "put options" and totally misrepresents the story about the German company recovering data from mainframes and hard drives;
it says that the FBI was "legally bound to investigate and to date they have done no such thing" (no basis for that assertion that I can think of), and entirely fails to note that an investigation was, in fact, conducted into the put options and reported upon, fails to note that the same investor who would have made money on one transaction had simultaneously made another transaction in which he would have lost just as much money;
it says that the alleged “profits” from these alleged “inside trades” were never collected, but – true to form - relies solely upon a newspaper report very shortly after Sept. 11/2001 and has never followed up since that time or bothered to research or report upon the completion of the transactions at issue;
personally, I don't think the loosechange trio even understands what put options are, and it is obvious that they have not done a scrap of independent research at all, nor have they followed up on the facts since 2001, again despite this being several "improved" versions of their garbage later;
as for the gold found underneath the World Trade Center, the loosechangers get this part so wrong that I almost feel sorry for them (only almost, though, because, yet again, they just make pluck nonsense from conspiracy sites as as they go along with absolutely no respect for facts, evidence or truth);
the gold (and silver) was found in the Bank of Nova Scotia vaults. There are actual photographs, evidence and statements proving this which is readily ascertainable to any actual researcher who bothers to research it diligently for an hour, but no, no, these boys don’t need no stinkin’ evidence, they are content to just spew another piece of crap instead;
they are content with a blurry email from some guy with a strange pseudonym panning the screen (much blurrier than in the previous version - seems that maybe they didn't like the fact that skeptics were actually reading it and proving their accompanying narrative to be dishonest but they couldn't be bothered to actually conduct the ten minutes worth of research that it would have taken for them to locate the truth on this point and correct their video as it, once again, wouldn't fit their tinhat theories) - while claiming that "Reuters reports" that the gold was found in "the back of a 10 wheel truck along with several cars in a delivery tunnel underneath WTC5" and then Avery goes on to opine that "I think it's safe to say that they were running away from the south tower". Er, no, it was gold and silver in the Bank of Nova Scotia vault that was located in the Bank of Nova Scotia vault. The vault was intact and so were the contents and the evidence is easily obtainable if they bothered to look.
they also claim that the gold (they keep forgetting about the silver) was moved out overnight, which is based on the same faulty news story of October 31 or November 1, 2001, which they clearly have never bothered to investigate. If they had, they would know that the NYPD was thrilled that the story was wrong as it took more than a week to get the gold and silver out of the vault and the incorrect story in the New York Times was a boon to them for security purposes;
oh, and they now say that "they" were "running away from the south tower" with just $1 billion worth of gold, a figure much less than a mere 1% of the original bogus figure of $160 billion or more which the loosechangers claimed earlier on the basis of these three words: "rumor has it" in earlier versions of this little fairy tale, although they still appear to done no research at all to substantiate even the much smaller figure;
their "truth seeking" skills appear to amount to nothing more than scouring conspiracy theory sites on the internet, picking out what they think will sell easily to the gullible, while ignoring and discarding anything they might accidentally stumble upon on a non-conspiracy site that remotely resembles, requires, or provides facts or evidence. Even then, their "truth seeking" skills are shoddy at best, grossly and deliberately dishonest at worst;
it's as though they've adopted the attitude that, "hey, let's just put forward as fact one eyewitness account that supports our tinhat theories and let's ignore the corresponding hundred eyewitness accounts that contradict that one account"; and, finally,
everything in this fairy tale is taken from conspiracy sites on the internet, mostly right wing ones full of anti-semitism, racism and pure looney toons/woo woo stuff;
I could go on and on but this is off the top of my head and suffice it to say that this is a piece of garbage on all levels. In the newest version, the loosechangers actually have the audacity to pat themselves on the back for their "tenacity and ingenuity" when they have displayed not one iota of either.
The only decent thing the loosechange guys did in their latest big steaming pile of crap was to remove from the previous versions several whoppers that even THEY couldn't stand to spout any longer (due to well deserved ridicule from those who do not don the tinfoil and from their own fellow conspiracy theorists who were equally embarrassed when they had to grudgingly admit that some of the earlier fairy tales were even too much woo woo for them) (see the earlier versions which are still available on the internet if you really want to be appalled even more), in addition to removing the following lies:
i) that their claptrap was "dedicated to the lives we lost on 9/11"; that “
hold the 9-11 widows, orphans and others who were affected by September 11 in the highest regard”;
ii) that “ mean no disrespect to them or their loved ones in releasing this “documentary””;
iii) that “ are not trying to capitalize off of them, despite what some may believe”; and
iv) that “it is in their memory that search for the “truth”’
Since it is and has always been quite obvious that i-iv above were lies from the beginning, it is good that they removed them.
There are several point by point debunking guides and video to this garbage, and I am sure that they will be added to now that this latest version has been released, but give the following sources a peek at your leisure.
Loose Change Viewer’s Guide: a step by step companion piece to the Loose Change video that provides truth and facts that the Loose Change video willfully ignores and omits
http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html
Screw Loose Change (Annotated version of the Loose Change video, in three parts for easy viewing):
Go to http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/
Then click on "videos" at the left to get the links to each of the three parts.
Debunking911: an excellent site that debunks many of the untruths and half truths found on numerous conspiracy sites and in the Loose Change video
www.debunking911.com
911myths: an excellent site that debunks many of the untruths and half truths found on numerous conspiracy sites and in the Loose Change video
www.911myths.com
9/11 Deniers Speak - exposing the movement video – “Using their own words in various video and radio interviews, this video exposes the callous and ignorant behavior behind key members of the 9/11 Truth Movement and Loose Change. This video includes Jack Blood, Korey Rowe, Dylan Avery, Jason Bermas, Alex Jones, Jim Fetzer, and Jimmy Walter.” WARNING: THIS VIDEO CONTAINS GRAPHIC IMAGES and coarse language.
For the record, there are some parts of the 911 Deniers Speak video that I don’t care for, but it’s worth watching for the sake of seeing the derision and contempt that many self-proclaimed “truth” seekers show for the victims of the September 11, 2001 attacks. Personally, I think that the biggest disgrace shown is Jim Fetzer for his repeatedly casting slurs against victims, ranting at victims’ family members and telling jokes at the “truth” seekers convention where his loyal cult followers laugh it up quite uproariously at the expense of the dead and their families. (starting about 20 minutes in).
www.lolloosechange.co.nr/