|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
spooked (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 08:38 PM Original message |
Survivor's Report of Explosion and Fireball at WTC Exit as it Fell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. This is the experience of the last known person to exit the South Tower |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 09:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. That is a good question considering that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 08:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
21. But thermobarcic weapons do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 02:52 AM Response to Reply #21 |
54. I've noticed you speculating on that recently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 03:32 PM Response to Reply #54 |
82. When I look at the pictures and videos of the WTC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-24-06 02:30 PM Response to Reply #82 |
95. I agree that the appearance of the towers was beyond |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-24-06 02:42 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. "The reason thermite sounds good..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
3. Here's a site I found... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrgerbik (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 02:27 AM Response to Original message |
4. I don't think the CT'ers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 08:46 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I don't know about the CT side, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 11:37 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Speaking to this, I recently had some experience in this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrgerbik (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 11:59 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. these explosions were of a much higher intensity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 02:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Klimmer (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 03:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. You are wrong . . . there are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 06:06 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. If you want to believe you see explosions in the collapse videos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Klimmer (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 08:38 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Lared, with your reasoning we couldn't accept anything we have learned . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 09:24 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Thanks for the optics lesson, Unnecessary and lacking critical thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Klimmer (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 11:28 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. I didn't give an optics lesson, I was simply pointing out all the . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 03:50 AM Response to Reply #28 |
59. You have not answered my question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrgerbik (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 11:58 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. My bad.. the post was supposed to say OCT n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Klimmer (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
9. To the faithful OCT defenders . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 12:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I take it you have not bothered to even read the archives? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Klimmer (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 03:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Hack 89 . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 03:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Then why the flame bait? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 12:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I am sorry, but firemen are not considered reliable sources |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 09:00 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. Their lies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 09:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Sure - for at least the tenth time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 01:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Thermite doesn't explode. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salvorhardin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 03:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. I'll have "invisible jewish elves" for $100, Alex. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Klimmer (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 03:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. You are right --- Thermite doesn't explode. I never said it did . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 10:03 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. But high explosives cut steel in CD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Klimmer (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 10:32 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. In CD work . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 06:50 PM Response to Reply #27 |
67. Thermate is a pyrotechnic, not an explosive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 08:45 PM Response to Reply #26 |
68. According to you OCTers, we don't need controlled demolition, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 09:37 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Feel better now? ......Good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 10:32 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Sure, they take a conclusion and try to cram the facts in to fit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 11:00 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Did they test for HE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 11:35 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. So you are agreeing that they jumped to a conclusion and then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 11:39 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. The collapse of the buildings may have appeared to resemble... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 12:07 AM Response to Reply #73 |
74. Science and forensics should at least make an attempt to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 09:55 AM Response to Reply #74 |
77. Maybe they did bother to check. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 10:09 AM Response to Reply #77 |
78. They make no mention of building #7 though. They also make no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 10:50 AM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Maybe that's because their report on WTC7 is not finished yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 01:09 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. High temperature corrosion of steel might be relevant. Eaten away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 08:39 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. "..analysis of sample K-16 yielded no revelations on the collapse.." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 12:56 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. They make mention of both WTC7 and the FEMA sulfidation issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 11:37 PM Response to Reply #16 |
29. No, you're repeating falsehoods. Do you know what "nano" means? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 11:44 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:37 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. You're the one who is repeating falsehoods |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:44 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. I don't think it's explosive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:48 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. I am not mistaken.eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:50 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Excuse me if I don't take your word for it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:19 AM Response to Reply #36 |
42. So you guys don't even read Jones? It's not that long.eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:36 AM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Uh, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 02:57 AM Response to Reply #46 |
55. This should be good. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 03:11 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Meh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 04:02 AM Response to Reply #56 |
60. Deleted message |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:02 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Invincible Ignorance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:12 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. see my post below |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:35 AM Response to Reply #41 |
45. Well, then don't tell him! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 02:07 AM Response to Reply #41 |
50. You'd be mistaken again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 08:05 AM Response to Reply #50 |
62. Deleted message |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:10 AM Response to Reply #33 |
40. This is from Jones, but I also saw it referenced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:32 AM Response to Reply #40 |
44. You've got a broken link, do you know what you posted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Klimmer (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 03:28 AM Response to Reply #40 |
58. Thanks for correcting me --- it is Superthermate rather Nanothermate . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 12:27 AM Response to Reply #58 |
75. well, it's the same thing, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:33 AM Response to Reply #12 |
31. super thermate is an explosive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:36 AM Response to Reply #31 |
47. No, it isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 02:04 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. the lengths you will go to to appear to "win" - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 02:06 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Distractions at work, Folks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 02:10 AM Response to Reply #49 |
52. By who? Start reading at post #9. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 02:09 AM Response to Reply #48 |
51. What materials? Go ahead and quote the article. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 03:18 AM Response to Reply #48 |
57. "the info is in the first sentence"? Here's the first sentence: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 04:12 AM Response to Reply #57 |
61. My first sentence from above |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 08:14 AM Response to Reply #61 |
63. I don't think you've shown support for Jones' statement yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 03:05 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. I emailed Dr Pai. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 12:30 AM Response to Reply #47 |
76. You don't seem to understand.eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 08:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. "There is nothing you can say about it or do about it..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:47 AM Response to Reply #9 |
34. ooh, I hope I got the re-edited version, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:03 AM Response to Reply #34 |
38. For the children. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:06 AM Response to Reply #34 |
39. If you don't understand that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 08:23 AM Response to Reply #39 |
64. Deleted message |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
43. "Blown out the window" - another story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 02:45 AM Response to Reply #43 |
53. Doesn't that sound like it happened when the plane crashed into WTC1? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-24-06 04:54 AM Response to Reply #53 |
90. that doesn't make any sense,eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-24-06 05:17 AM Response to Reply #90 |
92. Sorry, yes, it makes the most sense in fact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-24-06 04:28 PM Response to Reply #90 |
97. Do you believe his friend was putting up blinds after a plane hit the WTC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 05:41 PM Response to Reply #43 |
66. Why wasn't Kevin blown out the window? He was only 3ft from his friend. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 03:37 PM Response to Reply #66 |
83. Must have been shaped charges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 07:30 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. So do you believe the Official Version? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 07:32 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. You don't remember me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 08:09 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. So what parts of the Official Theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-24-06 05:35 AM Response to Reply #86 |
93. Your question is worded in an interesting way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Klimmer (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-24-06 12:41 AM Response to Original message |
88. I got your EXPLODING "Superthermite" right here . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-24-06 04:50 AM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Thanks, guess we weren't the ones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-24-06 05:01 AM Response to Reply #88 |
91. No, you don't. Read carefully. I'm still waiting on a reply from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-24-06 02:14 PM Response to Reply #91 |
94. Obfuscation techniques at work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-24-06 07:44 PM Response to Reply #94 |
98. Recycled aluminum cans and rusted steel provide a cheap source of themite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-24-06 08:37 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. It's interesting cuz it leaves no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-24-06 10:11 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. A theory also suggests small nuclear devices used in both WTC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-27-06 04:33 AM Response to Reply #100 |
101. yes, the lack of any objects |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-27-06 06:39 AM Response to Reply #101 |
102. It sure as hell doesn't tell me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC