Jeez Mike. Thanks for clearing that up for me . . . clarifying the previously little known idea that apartheid only means what 'you' think it means and not what 'I' think it means. Sounds like a page straight out of the IDF playbook. Far be it for me to define my own opinions. I'll leave that job up to you from now on . . . NOT!
Personally, I think I'll ascribe to Nelson Mandela's definition of apartheid since he's had first hand experience:
"The Palestinian state cannot be the by-product of the Jewish state, just in order to keep the Jewish purity of Israel. Israel's racial discrimination is daily life of most Palestinians. Since Israel is a Jewish state, Israeli Jews are able to accrue special rights which non-Jews cannot do. Palestinian Arabs have no place in a "Jewish" state.
Apartheid is a crime against humanity. Israel has deprived millions of Palestinians of their liberty and property. It has perpetuated a system of gross racial discrimination and inequality. It has systematically incarcerated and tortured thousands of Palestinians, contrary to the rules of international law. It has, in particular, waged a war against a civilian population, in particular children.
The responses made by South Africa to human rights abuses emanating from the removal policies and apartheid policies respectively, shed light on what Israeli society must necessarily go through before one can speak of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East and an end to its apartheid policies."http://www.progressiveaustin.org/mandelap.htmTYY
BTW--->> In the future, if you're going to quote me Mike, at least have the decency to use the copy and paste function so that I'm not erroneously credited with your defective spelling and grammar. If you're having trouble understanding the definition of blatant (or in your case, 'blatent') discrimination and ethnic cleansing, perhaps it's the dictionary you're using. "Mistyped"? Garsh Mike, I'm jes thenkin' but wot yur tha wun thas bin mistypin'. . .