|
"I'm sorry that you received the impression that somehow my comments implicated all Israelis."
Your response is the weakest of the three in my implications of 'indicting all Israelis.' I didn't base it just on that post, but on your history of posts about Israel, especially stories where Israel or Israelis are the "villains." However, the person to whom I responded, who implies I am a member of the "Israel-can-do-no-wrong crowd", very much implies all Israelis with these remarks: "OMG! This is especially infuriating, sickening and heartbreaking given who is carrying out the experiments and considering what their people have been through at the hands of others who thought of them as animals, and not people. and "To think the the descendants of their victims, in their own country, would now do such things to their own citizens, some of whom suffered through the horror, themselves, of the Holocaust, is truly unsettling and depressing." First of all, is she privy to information that we are not? Does she know that these doctors are 1) Jewish, and/or 2) descendants of Holocaust victims? Perhaps. But I am guessing, she saw "Israeli" and made her response based on that, conflating "Jew" and "Israeli." The other poster, well, he just says: "Israelis are the last people I would have thought would reduce themselves to this kind of thing." Both respondents are placing this 'status' on all Israelis to be beyond reproach. Can you see that?
"...we do laud Israelis on a regular basis."
I am not sure whether to laugh or not. But, it does present an interesting dilemma. For someone who is labeled as "pro-Israeli," considering my stance on your examples, I guess I am not always "pro-Israeli" nor a member of the "Israel-can-do-no-wrong crowd." In turn, that would mean that you and your ilk are not always "anti-Israeli." Interesting.
"But I don't think you believe those people represent the real Israel, that they represent those who would invite harm to her people."
By your use of italics, you think they do represent the 'real Israel.' I think they represent a fringe (some of them, there are those who are for peace, but not at the expense of Israel's existence), much the same way the right-wing racists represent a fringe. The "real Israel" are those that see that they should be allowed to exist and that they are willing to make concessions, but it shouldn't be at their very own existence as a sovereign nation! The 'real Israelis' want peace, just not at "any price."
Have you ever wondered why there is an I/P forum? Ever?! Because Israel, unlike most nations, cannot be discussed by many without resorting to anti-Semitic canards, calls for ethnic cleansing, comparisons to the Nazi regime, and the expectations that Israel is supposed to be the "saint" of all nations!
The truth is, as I see it (IMO), is that many here are not "pro-Palestinian," they are simply "anti-Israeli!" If they were really pro-Palestinian, they would commend their good works, and condemn their bad ones. But, post after post, the main target is Israel. Look at the current rancor about the admission of Lieberman to the Knesset coalition. Where was that howling from the "pro-Palestinians" when Hamas was elected? Do you think they are liberal? Progressive? No. Hamas was elected and it was lauded as the "will of the Palestinian people." Then, there were the posts that because of the actions of Israel is the real reason Hamas was voted into power. The current civil war in Gaza? Israel's fault. The deaths caused by that violence? Israel's fault. To the "pro-Palestinians," it is always Israel's fault!
Where we agree, is that we do invest our time and our passions. But, you don't get labeled a "freeper" or someone "pretending to be a liberal." However, I don't care. I know who and what I am. I am pro-Israeli because I am pro-Israeli and not anti-Palestinian. I think there are more than few here that wouldn't be able to say the same in reverse.
|