Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Searching for "pro-gun Democrats"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:17 PM
Original message
Searching for "pro-gun Democrats"
We keep being told there are millions of rootin’ tootin’ gun-totin’ Democrats out there. So where are they?

Let’s look at some of the gun owner’s forums on the web. These are all three that we know DU visitors frequent, for they have all been plugged at one time or another in this very forum.

From the self described "Land of Reason," Glocksunlocked: "I keep hearing about all the "innocent" people in the Middle East. About all the "peaceful" Muslims. About "moderate" Arabs.
The terrorists are just like a gang, I am told. They are a minority of the population, a criminal element that, while despicable, should be brought to justice in a Court of Law by white-hat wearing AMERICAN HEROES ™. Then we can imprison them under peaceful, idyllic conditions to prove that we are morally-superior. So we can sleep easier at night, I guess.
Well, FUCK THAT…. To kill only a handful while leaving children and fertile women behind only delays the threat until the young are strong enough to carry the bomb-vests.
"
To which the responses include: "I think you've spoken for most of the real men in America. This pussified notion of tolerance and understanding has left us weak and the enemy sees it…. I think it's time to address the real problem inside America. While 1/4 of our country is fighting a war of survival, 1/4 of our country are committing treason and 1/2 don't know what the fuck is going on. If this was 1776 scaffolds would be a hot commodity."
Not much in that thread that can be called Democratic, or liberal, or even moderate.
And then there's this bit:
"Over recent events, it's come time for me to evaluate who I will be voting for this November. If Bush acts like a man informs us (and follows through) that we won't be taking this shit any longer, than he's got my vote."
To which the responses include:
"While I do not agree with everything he has done I will vote for Bush to keep Kerry out of office. Then again I would probably vote for a monkey to achieve the same ends…. President Bush has made some decisions that I would not have made had I been in his place. That said I will vote too reelect him this fall. A step in any other direction is a step backwards. … If I lived in a "Battleground" state though, I'd consider holding my nose and voting for Bush. … IMO, there is no other choice but Bush. All I can see is Kerry pandering to the UN for forgiveness, pulling out our troops and giving those muslim pigs the victory they want. Then, nothing will stop them from killing more Americans, even on our own soil. As much as I dislike Bush, it would be a real disaster if Kerry wins. …He would be worse than Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter combined. …the big picture shows he has held this country together through the worst attack on our soil and wars with 2 countries. All within 4 years! The economy is going strong and we are probably as safe as we could be with any other prez sitting in that chair. I think Bush and his staff are directly responsible with the way things are going today. (Hmmm...I can see that last line being used a quote buy someone!)"
Not a single pro-Kerry word.

From highroadrage, which "gun owning democrats": often extol here as a bastion of polite rationality welcoming to all political persuasions…we have the thread, "John Kerry: A Deeply Ignorant Man (sic)" It is basically the idiotic cheesesteak story from last fall and a bunch of other dreary crap, as relayed by the Spectator.
Comments include: " A patrician gigilo....all the stiffness of Al Gore AND Bill Clinton combined. The left gets what it deserves…. I'll have you know Johnny Ketchup was in Vietnam and he does not own an SUV (the family owns it)…. John sKerry makes Al Gore look like New Orleans at midinight on Mardi Gras…. I think it boils down to arrogance and elitism as to why John Kerry would be reluctant to ask for help in dealing with local issues that he really is uninformed about (the cheese steak debacle). " It’s inspiring to see the way gun-owning Democrats respond with utter silence in Kerry's defense. To be fair, one DU regular who will go unnamed does kind of sneer at the Spectator half-heartedly, but that’s it.
This is the discussion of the Berg beheading on highroadrage:
"I watched CNN at 6pm this evening, with a stopwatch in each hand. They gave eight minutes of coverage of the prison scandal for every one minute of coverage of the beheading. …For the first time in over sixty years, the American public does not have the will to fight an enemy who has declared war on us. The US public will only want war when it's being conducted in our own homes, and by then it will be too late."
To which the enlightened responses include:
"The animals that did this are not, IMO, muslims, or followers of any faith. They, and there ilk must be hunted down and exterminated for the good of mankind…. I live in the biggest liberal town in the U.S. Ratboy grew up here and all these libs in town make my blood boil…. They will ask for Armageddon, and our leaders will release the codes and awaken the fires of Oppenheimer. The birthplace of civilization will become a nuclear graveyard. And we shall have 1,000 years of peace…. I feel worse than I did after September 11. I'm so angry and sad all at the same time. I'm not sure how to get past it. It seems we are engaged in a war that we will not be able to win because we have to play by the rules. … The problem is fanatics. Same trouble we have with gun grabbers…. I'm on this board because I beleive in the principles of self-determination, mutual respect and love of human life that private gun ownership symbolises. Those who breed this belief that murdering people is God's will need to be cut out of the body of Humanity, the way cancerous lesions would be cut from a human body.(Oh yes he did too) I think we need to lash out against the media, myself…. Apparently he was roaming around Iraq by himself looking for work If true, that would be like blue-eyed me roaming around Watts during the riots." And on and on and on with nary a word that might even remotely be characterized as liberal or even particularly sane. And of course, no mention of what the Berg family themselves have to say, or of the questions raised as to where he had been and when he was released.

Finally, from Florida Shooters’ Nutwork…"What Hillary Told The Arabs," a dreary bit of half-baked crap from Joe (What dead intern?) Scarborough: "Lying - and a complicit press helping you get away with it - is a hard habit to break. " comments the moderator, and gun nuts chime in with "The Constitution defines this as Treason and the stated penalty is death. …. Jane Fonda should have been forced to stay and live in Vietnam ! " Not any word at all pro-Democrat there.
There ‘s also a thread titled "Thousands rally against Gay Marriage," a happy recap of a rally for bigotry from Faux News. "When our Nation is threatened by perversion and unhealthy agendas, then I am against it 100%." Cries the moderator." One member does remonstrate: "this a shooting board, not a gay, jew bashing nor a place for personal agendas." but when the moderator responds, " First off there has not been one "jew bashing post". Typical liberal style accusations, puting words in the mouths of those they wish to discredit." to which the first gun nut quickly screams, "Ok perhaps I went a little of in confusing stern bashing with jew bashing. I am far from being a liberal and I never tried to discredit you, but merely stating facts. I don't think that gay, tv censorship or god issues as political issues."

In short, the opinions range from far far right to even farther far right, with a dandy dash of genocide and hysteria thrown in.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. So you visited gun sites and found irrational right-wing rhetoric posted.
How exactly is this evidence that there are no pro-gun Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yeah...what a surprise!
So are you telling us, that like Chimpy in Alabama, they ARE there, but no one can see them?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. If there were no gun owning dems, why are you here

Shouldn't you be out arguing with pro-gun people?
OH wait, your here because there are a significant number
of gun-owning member here at DU.

You are your own worst enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Gee, gato....
Don't let me stop you...the URLs are here in this thread...and from the general incoherent gibberish I saw, you'll be right in your element there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. I'm not interested in your lame internet links

I don't have time to slum around on crappy low-profile backroads of the internet. Nonetheless, you seem to be awfully familiar with them.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Telling, isn't it....
Our "pro-gun Democrats" turn out to be all "pro-gun" but not a speck of "Democrat."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. And now you expose your real agenda
The purging of the party of anybody that does not buy the puritanical garbage you push.

so much for the big tent eh?
thank god most people on our side are not so intolerent and exclusive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustFiveMoreMinutes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. What exactly is pro-gun?
I am a registered Democrat, have never owned a gun and actually I have never even fired a gun (other than BB as a youngster).

I support an individual's 'right' to own a gun, altho I do not have any problems with 'wait periods or background checks' and banning of assault weapons. But I have no problems with responsible people owning and enjoying sporting equipment and personal collections of firing devices.

Am I pro-gun or anti- ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Jeeze, what a mystery...
Call for Nancy Drew, or the Hardy boys...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mosin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. A moderate anti-
If you support banning personal firearms or imposing arbitrary waiting periods, then you do not support an individual right to keep and bear arms for defense and security.

A right is not subject to arbitrary infringement. Treat the right to keep and bear arms like the right to speak your mind -- i.e., no prior restraints -- and you can claim to support the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustFiveMoreMinutes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
46. but we do limit our rights to speak our minds, arbitrarily
I can't 'incite a riot'.. I can't 'endanger' (yell fire in a crowded room).. and I have to get a 'license' from the city for many demonstration purposes... and of course the Patriot Act goes much further with limits on freedoms of speech, privacy, protection.

So 'arbitrary' might be too vague of a term in this instance.

But I really don't have any problems with your designation of my stance on guns.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. I Think I Know Where The "Pro-Gun Democrats" Are
They're gathered together somewhere to bitch and moan about how they were banned from DU......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Howard Dean was the most progun Dem at the National level
Dean didn't win a single primary outside Vermont. Even rural white states like New Hampshire and Iowa rejected Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yeah, that NRA endorsement was a big help, wasn't it?
And of course you and I both know that if Dean had won the nomination he'd be vilified the same way Kerry is by gun nuts.

They're not fooling anyone...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Another lie from the gun-grabber crowd
The NRA never endorsed Howard Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I still don't understand why everyone thinks Dean was pro-gun. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. You're probably right...
(snicker)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. McD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am a pro gun Democrat
I do not currently own a gun but I have had several. I support responsible gun ownership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Well, your work's cut out for you, then....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. McD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:45 PM
Original message
And your point is????
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. Pretty fucking obvious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Obvious flame-bait
Par for the course around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. One right here in Socal
i handgun, one 22 rifle and a 20g shotgun.(No Kids) waiting to catch a 'sneak n peek" MF in my home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Thanks for volunteering
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TX-RAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'm a pro gun democrat
I own many guns, mostly shot guns, single action revolvers, and a couple of double actions that were old duty weapons.
I have never said we should get rid of guns. All I've ever said was i don't like assault weapons, and I'm not to crazy about civilians with very little training carrying concealed weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mosin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. "Assault Weapons"
You'll be happy to know that I support your right to not own any "assault weapons." :)

And if you accidently come into possession of any, I will be happy to take them off your hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TX-RAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #30
44. Thanks for your concern
I feel much better now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern democrat Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. Pro-Gun Democrat
I am a pro-resposible gun owning Democrat.I own several guns.I firmly believe in saftey/responsiblity.All my firearms are in a safe and I am the only one with the combonation.

I respect the right for anyone who chooses not to own a gun ,for them not to do so.If a gun owner lawfully owns a gun and uses/stores it responsibly,I expect my rights to be respected.I also feel the Democratic position on guns is more in tune with my personal ideals than republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Plenty of work to be done...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Go get 'em yourself
There's way too much work to be done here on DU, like correcting all the misinformation about the assault weapons ban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. Lifelong loyal pro-gun Democrat
So there, MrBenchley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. I'm laughing my ass off, gato...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. No in fact I am always rather bemused by your puritanical rantings
especially given the fact that you will never get anywhere
with your dead end agenda

I really don't take you seriously.
However, I do enjoy the flame wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. That's some nice research there...
...been studying with Belelsiles and Lott? :D

Also nice to see how you ignored all the polls that have been
made here inquiring about gun attitudes amongst our membership.

Like this one:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=118&topic_id=49747

Or this one:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=524599&mesg_id=524599
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. No research at all, roe, just a report on the crap gun nuts peddle...
Funny how our "pro-gun Democrats" are unwilling to say anything even remotely pro-Democrat over where their peers can actually hear them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Your the one bench that seems obsessed with these places

You kinda remind me of the family values types that
spend all their time talking about homosexuality.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
36. I like Rep. Dingell.
He is a no nonsense sort of guy.

**********************************************
August 1, 2000



The Honorable Janet Reno

Attorney General

Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20530

Dear Attorney General Reno:

I read with great interest Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder’s June 4, 2000, announcement regarding the release of two Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) reports on Federal Firearm Offenders and Background Checks for Firearm Transfers. As you are aware, effective and timely enforcement of our nation’s federal firearms laws is of tremendous importance to the Congress. As we continue to look for effective strategies to prevent firearms from falling into the wrong hands and reduce gun violence, reports such as these are useful in evaluating the progress of the Administration on this front.

As Mr. Holder notes in his statement, "the Brady Law has stopped 536,000 felons, fugitives, domestic abusers, and other persons not legally allowed to have a gun from getting a gun." This is indeed an impressive record. The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) is one of the most effective tools we have to crack down on gun criminals and prevent crime. However, stopping the sale of a firearm to a prohibited person is only one component of an effective strategy to reduce violent criminal behavior. Prosecuting those felons, fugitives and domestic abusers who attempt to purchase a firearm is the other half of the equation.

The BJS report on Firearm Offenders states that an average of 6,700 defendants were charged with a firearm offense in U.S. district courts between 1992 and 1999. On its face, that number of prosecutions seems incredibly low given the number of prohibited persons stopped by the instant check system. An analysis of the BJS reports confirms that the number of federal prosecutions is severely inadequate.

As you are aware, 18 U.S.C. 922(a)(6) makes the attempted purchase of a firearm by an individual who knowingly provides false information on a firearm transfer application (ATF Form 4473) a federal felony offense. In simple terms, it is a federal felony, punishable for up to ten years in prison, for felons, fugitives, domestic abusers or any other category of prohibited person to attempt to purchase a firearm if they knowingly falsify the purchase application.

Of the 204,000 attempted purchases stopped by NICS in 1999, the BJS report states that 71 percent of the rejections were for a felony conviction or indictment, 12 percent were for a disqualifying domestic violence conviction and three percent were rejected because the applicant was a fugitive from justice. Thus, 86 percent (approximately 175,440 persons) of those rejected by the instant check system had de facto committed another felony by falsifying ATF Form 4473. However, federal firearm prosecutions in aggregate totaled only 6,728. Although the report indicated the statistics for 1999 are preliminary data, that is a prosecution rate of only 3.29 percent. To put it another way, for every thirty rejected applications for a firearm transfer, there was only one prosecution.

If we are to concern ourselves with 1998, the latest year for which we have final data, the record is demonstrably worse. Of the rejected applications, totaling 90,000 in 1998, a mere 102 cases were federally prosecuted. That equates to a prosecution rate of less than one percent. Thus in 1998, for every 882 rejected applications for a firearm transfer there was only one federal prosecution. And while some have made the case that these cases are difficult to prosecute, I would note the statement of former federal prosecutor Andrew McBride of the Richmond office, now in private practice, that such cases are as easy to prosecute as "picking change up off the street."

Needless to say, these statistics are less than impressive. It is not hard to understand why this Administration has been criticized for being lax in enforcing existing federal firearm laws. In an effort to better understand why the Department of Justice is not doing more to prosecute violations of 18 U.S.C. 922(a)(6), I would appreciate your answers to the following questions:

Some of the reasons for this poor prosecutorial record are indicated in the BJS Federal Firearm Offenders report. Citing table 1,"Firearm suspects declined for prosecution by U.S. attorneys, by reason for declination, 1998," some of the reasons listed for not prosecuting known gun criminals include: minimal federal interest and DOJ/U.S. Attorney policy. I find this very curious. Please tell me:
What exactly is the policy for prosecuting violations of 18 U.S.C(a)(6)?

Why there would be a DOJ/U.S. Attorney policy not to prosecute those who violate federal firearms laws?

Why there would be "minimal federal interest" in prosecuting those who violate federal firearm laws?

Another reason that was cited in table 1 for declining to prosecute was "weak evidence." Without knowing the facts of each individual case, I would note the following: If an individual knowingly makes a false statement on ATF Form 4473, that is a felony. Form 4473 requires the prospective purchaser to state whether or not he/she is disqualified from purchasing a firearm. Furthermore, each disqualifying criterion is listed on Form 4473 and requires a yes or no answer. Form 4473 also requires a signature by the prospective purchaser and the seller. Form 4473 also requires many other identifiers to verify the identity of the transferee. Thus, if an individual is rejected because NICS system reports that a prospective purchaser is a convicted felon and falsified a document in an attempt to obtain a firearm, that is a violation of U.S.C. 922(a)(6). It seems to me that this should be a relatively open and shut case.
However, of the 204,000 individuals denied the purchase of firearm "nearly 3 out of 4 rejections for firearm transfer occurred because the applicant either had a felony conviction or was under felony indictment." Therefore, it follows that over 150,000 individuals committed a federal felony by falsifying ATF Form 4473. Yet, a February, 2000 General Accounting Office report on the Implementation of NICS showed that in FY 1999, U.S Attorneys filed only 278 cases involving alleged false statements of 18 U.S.C. 922(a)(6) and 316 cases were pending at fiscal yearend. Please explain the lack of federal prosecutions for false statements on ATF Form 4473. Also explain towhat degree "weak evidence" contributes to the unwillingness of U.S. Attorneys to prosecute 18 U.S.C. 922(a)(6) violations.

Appendix III of the GAO audit describes federal enforcement policies regarding falsified firearm purchase applications. It states:
In November 1998, EOUSA provided Brady Act prosecutive guidance . . . The guidance stated that thousands of potential Brady false-form cases would likely reach ATF field offices annually, and that the system "would grind to a halt if ATF investigated all the denials."

The report goes on to say that the EOUSA guidance recommended that U.S. Attorneys should "make every effort to increase the number of Brady false-form prosecutions (from the current annual level of 50 cases)."

The GAO audit also states that in deciding which false form violations to forward to U.S. Attorneys, ATF’s policy is to refer those cases where the "denied purchaser’s criminal history has records of violent felonies, serious drug trafficking, or prior firearms convictions." Yet the GAO report indicates that over half of the referrals of violent criminals were closed without investigation or prosecution.

In light of these GAO findings, I would like answers to the following:

Why were half of the referrals of violent criminals closed without investigation or prosecution?
What efforts has the Department of Justice undertaken to increase the number of false form prosecutions? Has EOUSA issued any additional guidance regarding 18 U.S.C. (a)(6) violations?
Since November 1998, how many 18 U.S.C. (a)(6) violations have been referred to U.S. Attorneys by ATF field offices?
How many 18 U.S.C. (a)(6) false form prosecutions have U.S. Attorneys undertaken since the November 1998 EOUSA guidance?
I do not believe that violent felons, upon learning they are disqualified from firearm ownership, give up their search to obtain a firearm. Please explain why U.S. Attorneys are unwilling to enforce 18 U.S.C. (a)(6) even for violent felons who attempt to purchase firearms?
At a June 21, 2000, hearing at the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding improvements to NICS, Mr. David Loesch, Assistant Director in charge of the Criminal Justice Information Services Division of the FBI testified that the law prohibiting felonious misrepresentation of firearm eligibility "is essentially unenforceable." Would you please expand on this statement and explain why your representative characterized this law as such? Do you share the view that this law is unenforceable? Please comment on the enforceability of U.S.C. 18 (a)(6) in all its specifics and in general.
Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. I look forward to your response. If you have any questions about this matter, please have your staff contact Michael Hacker of my office at (202) 225-4071.

With every good wish,



Sincerely,





John D. Dingell

Member of Congress


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Nice of you to volunteer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Que?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. opinión algo favorable-Demo'crata o liberal
es eso demasiado difícil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
37. ## Support Democratic Underground! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v2.0
==================

The time now is 3:55:29PM EDT, Thursday, May 13, 2004.

There are exactly...
3 days,
8 hours,
4 minutes, and
31 seconds left in our fund drive.

This website could not survive without your generosity. Member donations
pay for more than 84% of the Democratic Underground budget. Don't let
GrovelBot become the next victim of the Bush economy. Bzzzt.

Please take a moment to donate to DU right now. Thank you for your support.

- An automated message from the DU GrovelBot


Click here to donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. I guess we can add grovelbot to the list, he he

Beware grovelbot you will now be endlessly insulted and personally attacked by the anti-gun crusaders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Grovelbot, looks like you're going to do
just as much as these "pro-gun democrats"

Wonder why those who are quick to post pictures of their lethal toys (for whatever twisted, idiotic reason) are so reluctant to support Democrats openly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mosin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
45. Lifelong African-American Texas Democrat here....
Graduated from college... Married my beautiful Latina high school sweetheart... Moved to Ohio... Had two beautiful babies...

But I guess I'm just another racist, right-wing, redneck, gun-owner....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Hee hee hee...
So what's keeping you?

http://www.glocksunlocked.com

http://www.thehighroad.org

http://floridashootersnetwork.com

"I guess I'm just another racist, right-wing, redneck, gun-owner"
Proof's in the pudding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. so now your calling African American Democrats "right-wing rednecks"

just because they believe in the right to own a gun

Man bench, you really are your own worst enemy.

Beyond that, I'm really starting to question your sense of reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:27 PM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Yep, anyway, why should we obey your orders?

I know you somehow think you are the arbiter of what it means to be a democrat but nobody here is interested in following you.

You post some stupid ass web links that I have never even heard of and you expect me to go sign up and hang out on there?

No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mosin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #48
62. firearms enthusiasts websites
I'm already quite familiar with thehighroad.org. Like everything on the Internet, it is quite a mixed bag, with a lot of clowns and a lot of responsible firearms enthusiasts (i.e., gun nuts) like myself.

I'm unfamiliar with the other two, but I'll check them out tonight. I'm actually quite a fan of Glocks -- they are such lovely black firearms -- but I frequent glocktalk.com instead.

And you're right, I'm filled with a constant, horrible, racist, right-wing, redneck self-loathing. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. We'll all be holding our breath...
"I'm filled with a constant, horrible, racist, right-wing, redneck self-loathing."
Funny, that's not what I suspect...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Why don't you tell us exactly what you suspect?
Do you have the balls to say it in open forum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
51. WTF, you're assigning us homework?
This is like some kind of gang initiation ritual.

"Prove your loyalty to the Democrats. Go to these sites and post a bunch of Dem slogans to show us you belong."

Jesus, we don't post at those sites probably for the same reasons you don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. exactly

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Please elaborate on "my true colors".
Are you implying that my comments about Jesse Jackson make me a racist?

The guy runs a "charitable organization" with cooked books and has a nasty habit of making his female assistants pregnant.

I don't care what color his skin is or what party he belongs to, he's a dirtbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Don't need to, op....
It's plain for all to see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. If you make an accusation, have the balls to back it up.
Don't slink away with your tail between your legs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Gee, op, nobody has to make any accusation
right wing talking points speak for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. No, actually...they don't.
If you are going to say that my crack on Jesse Jackson "shows my true colors," you'd better be able to explain what that means. Because it looks to me like you are shamefully playing the race card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
54. well bench, looks like this thread has turned into a big loser for you

maybe you can try one of your other tactics
not that they will work any better

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Not hardly, gato...
Showed what's really lurking under that "gun rights" sheet quite clearly.

I'll post this again next week...and you know what? I doubt there'll be a single pro-Democrat post at any of those sites in all that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Of course not there won't be.
Because we don't visit those websites and we don't take orders from you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. Hey, op, for once I agree with you...
Says it all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. I'm not gonna go slumming in some back ally just because you want me to


but hey, you're the one obsessed with them why are you not
over there posting whatever you want to?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
68. Three hours...
And the outpouring of pro-Democrat posts from our "pro-gun Democrats" is....non-existent. Is anyone surprised?

Amusingly, one of these cesspools has spouted a thread urging loonies to sign a pro-Rumsfeld petition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. You need to get your eyes checked
Or learn how to read. Or take half the world off of Ignore.

:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. Nobody's surprised that none of us take orders from you.
Edited on Thu May-13-04 04:41 PM by OpSomBlood
"When Benchley says 'jump,' we say, 'fuck off.'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Gee, op...
Good thing the "pro-gun Democrats" put their pathetic little popguns over trivial concerns like the good of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. If you really want a pro-Democrat post I'll be happy to give you one.
Democrat Errol Romero from Louisiana is top notch. I would totally vote for him if I lived in his district.

"When I go throughout Louisiana, I carry a gun," said Romero who fought the gun-buying background checks under federal law. "When I go to New Orleans, I carry two guns."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. Ted Rall.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSandman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #72
80. Nick Rahall D-WV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
74. Four hours...says it all, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. MrBenchley has a new hobby
Keep it up, man. Every hour, on the hour, 24 hours per day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
75. By the way...
never mind the rancid little pool of "enthusiasts" here...

Where are the "pro-gun Democrats" who aren;t DU members...How come there aren't ANY pro-Democrat posts on those cesspools?

Jeepers, you don't suppose gun rights is just ordinary John Birch type horseshit hiding under a different sheet? Who'd have suspected that looking at the folks in the Second Amendment Caucus, or reading news stories like this?

"PITTSBURGH -- A man whose son was killed in the Columbine High School shootings literally walked in his child's shoes to the National Rifle Association convention, where he hoped Vice President Dick Cheney would address the federal assault weapons ban set to expire in September.
Tom Mauser, whose son Daniel was killed with an assault weapon in the Littleton, Colo., killings five years ago Tuesday, said continuing the ban is common sense.
Assault weapons "are the weapons of gangs, drug lords and sick people," Mauser said before his three-block march to the convention, which runs through Sunday. "It is a weapon of war and we don't want this war on our streets."
Mauser entered the convention hall where the NRA was meeting, but was turned away by a security guard as several conventioneers applauded. A couple of conventioneers yelled "Get a life" and "Vote for Bush." "

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/3015989/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
77. MrBenchley has achieved a new level of hypocrisy
Edited on Thu May-13-04 05:48 PM by slackmaster
He insists that all pro-gun sites are on the far right, then tries to get fellow DU contributors to do his trolling on those sites for him, all the while pretending not to see the many pro-Democratic posts that have been made by pro-gun Democrats on this thread.

How many times has he ranted and raved about those nasty people on right-wing discussion boards bragging about their trolling of Democratic Underground?

:dunce:

Do your own Spelunking, MrBenchley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustFiveMoreMinutes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #77
78. Taking the Benchley Bait..
Well, since I'm new here and just looking around getting settled, I thought I'd go to at least the UNLOCKED site and poke around.

Pretty staid stuff, general discussions about life, questions about types of guns, etc. Pretty boring stuff for the most part.

One interesting post was a question concerning lethal force,
you're walking in the park when someone grabs your child and tries to abduct them.

Same scenario, but the person doing the grabbing was female and a large MALE stops attempts to stop you from grabbing your kid back, can you shoot him too?

Okay... am I just wrong in thinking that I'm pretty safe in a public park that I'm familiar with and I'm always on guard of people around me especially when I have my kids with me... that I really really NEVER think about someone menacing grabbing my kid IN my presence?

Or am I to 'fear' everything and just ALWAYS have a gun handy for my 'protection' from strangers? But then of course, those strangers have guns because I'm a stranger to them so then I have to have a bigger gun, but then if the stranger knows I have a bigger gun, then they get paranoid and they have to get TWO BIG guns.

Does anyone see the circle of fear that is being perpetuated? AND NO it's NOT just the 'gun lobbyists'... ALL groups use the same 'worst case fear tactics' to prove their points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mosin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. glocksunlocked and floridashooters
Both glocksunlocked and floridashooters are small and boring. Between the two of them, they only have 1,433 members. (For comparison, Glocktalk has 33,573 members and he High Road has 11,048 members.) Obviously they both have their share of nutcases. Every group does.

Guilt by association is not a valid theory of justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
81. Seven hours...
Glocks Unlocked sprouted a thread titled "Let's Abuse Some More Prisoners" and tried to justify the rape of an Iraqi female prisoner by pointing out "At least we did'nt have a dyke like Rosie O'donnell there to rape the bitch." (The same thread noted "Kerry admitted to committing war "atrosities". I don't see all the lefty, PC, homo's calling for his resignation from the race.")

Highroadrage spouted yet another call for nukes in Iraq...the good news is, it had what might be considered a moderate opinion (although it don't seem to be from anyone here).


And Florida Nutwork is much the same as it was...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
82. Locking this one
I understand Bench's point - Most Dems don't seem to post on the Pro Gun sites I have visited.

The other perspective rings equally true. Why fight it out on a pukey RW site?

Ok, so, were all Dems here, right? Right. :eyes:. So, since we all look forward to the ouster of Bush* in November, lets try to get along. Turn over a new leaf, start anew, find something good in our slip side to the RKBA argument. Okay? Okay.

I'm glad we could have this talk. Thanks.

:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC