Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ATF Sanctioning 'Straw' Gun Sales since 2006, Houston Dealer Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 10:18 AM
Original message
ATF Sanctioning 'Straw' Gun Sales since 2006, Houston Dealer Says
http://www.myfoxhouston.com/dpp/news/local/111117-atf-sanctioning-straw-gun-sales-since-2006-houston-dealer-says

HOUSTON - One of the largest gun sellers in Texas says the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms was sanctioning questionable sales of weapons likely bound for Mexican drug cartels long before Eric Holder became US Attorney General.

Months before Americans became familiar with the gun running debacle known as "Fast and Furious", Houston firearms dealer Carter's Country was blowing the whistle on ATF-sanctioned straw sales to customers who likely represented Mexican drug cartels.

The Houston-based gun dealer felt compelled to speak out after being linked to scores of firearms seized from drug thugs across the border

In a December 2010 interview with FOX 26, attorney Dick Deguerin said Carter’s Country went through with the sales because ATF told them to.

<more>

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Did they get anything from the ATF in writing ? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Every citizen should be outraged at this scandal ...
It doesn't matter if you are pro or anti civilian firearm ownership or if you are a Republican, a Democrat or an Independent. You should insist on and support a thorough and possibly independent investigation of government programs that allowed the purchase of firearms by criminals engaged in smuggling weapons to Mexico.

Some feel that the Republicans are using Operation Fast and Furious to bash the Obama administration, the ATF and the Justice Department which while true totally ignores the fact that a similar program called Operation Wide Receiver was in place during the Bush administration.

It took a lot of effort and expense to set up our current system to prevent straw purchases and to curtail gun smuggling to Mexico and to the streets of our cities. Willingly allowing lethal weapons to "walk" is totally and absolutely unforgivable. These weapons have not only led to the death of one of a U.S. Border Patrol agent but have caused perhaps as many as two hundred deaths in Mexico. The latter fact is rarely mentioned by the media.

First we need to find out everybody who was involved in the decision to implement these programs and we need to hold them accountable. It matters not what administration they served under.

We also need to find better ways to stop the straw purchase of firearms and prevent gun smuggling. This may mean more boots on the ground and the expenditure of far more money to the resulting finance law enforcement activity.

As a gun owner I fully support efforts to insure that firearms sold at U.S. gun stores end up only in the hands of responsible citizens in OUR nation. If I were a person who had a personal dislike of firearms in civilian hands, I would still feel that our current existing laws should be enforced and not bypassed.

Many of these firearms are still unaccounted for and will be used for further criminal activity both in Mexico and possibly here in the United States.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ditto.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AzWorker Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. This was posted before and oddly enough fell on deaf ears...
ATF/FBI/DOJ have been colluding to send guns to mexico and pump up the stats for YEARS.

When will DOJ quit STONEWALLING and let us get to the bottom of the matter.

Why were the failed tactics of Wide Receiver 1 & 2 allowed to be repeated in Fast and Furious with NONE of the safeguards that WR 1 & 2 had in place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I have posted numerous BATF stories, I included "earlier" schemes...
by that agency, including "Wide Receiver."

I also speculated that DOJ may stonewall further investigation by holding up "Wide Receiver" like a cross before Dracula if the GOP continues "Gun Walker/"Fast & Furious" investigations.

Good questions. If BATF (and other agencies) did not put in any safeguards, and truly let the guns "walk," then they may have had other goals. Further speculation: The guns were NOT lost, but were intended to (1) go to a rival cartel (Sinaloa as opposed to Zetas); or (2) they were lost (didn't matter) in order to construct a case for restricting gun shops in the border states.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "in order to construct a case for restricting gun shops in the border states"
Is that you speculating that there?

I advise caution. I'd have thought you'd know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Please re-read. You're is a pointless post. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. okay, that was you speculating
It was pretty clear to me, I just wanted to offer you the opportunity to explain that you had misspoken, if that was the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. What? Another big dumb catfish on stage? Creating feed back? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. don't think you could get a conviction on this one Councillor
read the year. Think Dick Cheney. Cheney and Rove are the kind of people who could think of something like that. It kind of provides evidence for my conspiracy theory.
I remember Seymor Hersh writing something about Cheney loyalists staying behind to screw things up. Some of these in the ATF? Continue Wide Receiver and call it FF but without telling the Mexicans about it? While they are at it, forget to tell or misinform Holder? Then accuse this administration of a false flag false flag excuse.

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2009/03/... /
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I have no idea what you are talking about
Edited on Sat Nov-19-11 02:57 PM by iverglas
I made it quite clear I was talking about this:

Further speculation: The guns were NOT lost, but were intended to (1) go to a rival cartel (Sinaloa as opposed to Zetas); or (2) they were lost (didn't matter) in order to construct a case for restricting gun shops in the border states.

There was nothing about Cheney or Rove or their alleged loyalists in that.


... and a typo in the subject line again ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. there was nothing about the current administration in that either
or the party affiliations of those involved. He could have been referring to rouge elements in ATF wanting more power in 2006 or be in fact be Cheney loyalists in charge or both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AzWorker Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Anecdotal evidence.....
Remember thats what the DC ATF supervisor told the PHX ATF supervisor in one of the released DOJ/ATF email, he hoped that F&F would provide the anecdotal evidence they required to push for border State long gun reporting...

So yes, ATF seemed to be making sales happen and expected to get some more gun regulations out of it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. may I see that email please?
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AzWorker Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Here is a link
From the summer of 2010....

Thanks



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. what an appallingly unfounded allegation you made
Edited on Sat Nov-19-11 09:38 PM by iverglas
It was: So yes, ATF seemed to be making sales happen and expected to get some more gun regulations out of it...

What you have actually produced in your attempt to back that up is the complete opposite.

It appears quite clear from that memo that there had been an observed phenomenon that indicated the existence of a problem, and that in order to take action to combat the problem (which is, you know, what governments tend to do), evidence of the phenomenon was being collected.

Otherwise, the memo would pre-date the phenomenon, or some other method of collecting the evidence that had been allegedly generated for the alleged purpose in question would have been organized from the outset, duh; somebody wouldn't be casting around trying to find and collect it post facto, for pity's sake.

Your allegation is really quite atrocious. Since you have completely failed to back it up, I would really recommend retracting it. I know that if I'd been fool enough to make it and then offer as proof something that tended to prove the complete opposite, I'd be wishing I could turn back the clock, myself.


Sure is interesting where one finds that text on the internet ...

http://www.google.ca/search?complete=0&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1024&bih=612&q=%22see+if+these+guns+were+all+purchased+from+same+ffl%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AzWorker Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Ummm...
Chait wants the info on Fast and Furious sales to use to further a proposed gun control regulation. The 'observed phenomenon' in this instance was encouraged by ATF. It does not matter when the memo was produced, they are taking data from sales they encouraged and using it to further an agenda.

They manufactured a crisis

It should be simple to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. "It" is quite simple to understand
Have no fear.

You (and your fellow travellers) are taking a sequence of events and inverting it, and ascribing intent ex post facto.

I sure know what you (and your fellow travellers) would be saying if anyone else did that:

Gun militants agitated for widespread access to permits to carry concealed firearms.
A holder of a permit to carry a concealed firearm killed someone in cold blood.
Oh look! The gun militants were motivated by a desire for people to be killed!

Okay, that isn't all that ridiculous ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Oneka Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. appallingly unfounded allegations?
I think not. That poster ,in fact, made two allegations,lets parse them out shall we?

#1:
ATF seemed to be making sales happen


If you believe the article in the OP:
In a December 2010 interview with FOX 26, attorney Dick Deguerin said Carter’s Country went through with the sales because ATF told them to.


Allegation # 1, easily seen to be not "unfounded"

#2:
and expected to get some more gun regulations out of it


Who expected to get more regulations?

The BATFE.


what regulations did they expect to get out of it?

This one :http://www.scribd.com/doc/61159256/ATF-Multiple-Rifle-Sale-Reporting-Requirement-Letter

Accompanied by this, AFT form: http://www.scribd.com/doc/61164591/Report-of-Multiple-Rifle-Sales

what is "it"?

It: is ATF making sales happen.


who is Mark R. Chait?

He works for the BATFE. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/markrchait


Who is Bill Newell: An BATFE supervisor: http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jul/28/nation/la-na-fast-furious-emails-20110729

A key player in the "Fast and Furious" program.


Did the presented Email, support that the allegation, that ATF expected to get some more gun regulations out of it?

Mark Chait, in his position as an ATF employee made this statement to Bill Newell:
We are looking at anecdotal cases to support a demand letter on long gun multiple sales.


Read the Email again, if you believe its content, the allegation is well supported, and not unfounded in the least.



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x480442#480903

It doesn't really matter which of the allegations came first. They are both easily "founded" by the information presented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Here is your problem. YOU don't know what the definition of "unfounded" is.
It simply means, "I don't want to believe that".

Seee, the problem is yours.

Do I really need the sarcasm thingy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Oneka Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. My God
How could I have been so ignorant , and shortsighted?
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. "How could I have been so ignorant , and shortsighted?"
I wouldn't know about that, but maybe there's some connection to how you could have put together that completely unintelligible abstract art of little boxes and random words and phrases in your previous post.

Just to try to get it clear in my head: are you saying that the ATF incited illegal gun sales in order to get new gun control measures imposed?

Yes or No will suffice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Oneka Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. What i said
is more along the lines of this:

Your allegation is really quite atrocious. Since you have completely failed to back it up, I would really recommend retracting it. I know that if I'd been fool enough to make it and then offer as proof something that tended to prove nothing at all, I'd be wishing I could turn back the clock, myself.


Why would i possibly answer your question with a simple yes or no, when so much more is appropriate. I find it quite insulting that you would
even ask your question in such a manner.
you seldom answer questions with a simple yes or no, why would you expect anyone else to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AzWorker Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Well...
It is obvious that they were willing to use gun sales they incited to get new gun control measures imposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. not so healthy
It is obvious that they were willing to use gun sales they incited to get new gun control measures imposed.

You are claiming to deduce this from the memo you posted?

There must be something there in invisible pixels that I'm not seeing. Will it help if I spray lemon juice on my monitor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Holy shit!!! THAT is the smoking gun that proves
this was used to further a gun control agenda - by our own government!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #20
31. holy shit indeed!!!!!
Whoopsla, eh?

Dangerous days in the dungeon ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Oneka Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #20
32. Not sure about a smoking gun,
but why did Mark Chait send an email inquiring about anecdotal
cases, to support a demand letter, several days AFTER, the demand
letter was sent? Doesnt the horse go before the cart???
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AzWorker Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. 2010 vs 2011....
This email predates the demand letter sent to FFL's by a year
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Oneka Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Thanks for the correction.
i looked at that email on my phone, guess i should have waited to see it more clearly on a real screen before posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Oneka Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. The times , they are a changin.....
Edited on Fri Nov-18-11 11:31 PM by Oneka
Very few - but thousands of assault rifles illegally purchased by straw buyers in border states

by willing greedy NRA-loving gun dealers end up in Mexico every year.

Tghe NRA looks the other way.

The ATF is trying to stop this,

yup

emphasis added

. No one is accusing the ATF of gunrunning - the "whistle bowers" objected to the investigation tactic...

Big Diff

yup


This has been discussed here http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4745509#4745947
Back in February, where you denied that ATF Sanctioned illegal straw purchases, and in fact said that "the ATF was trying to stop this"

What a difference 8 months can make eh?

So now were going over this story again,?? with FOX NEWS as your source??

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. More "We have always been at war with Eastasia" revisionism from the OP
Edited on Sun Nov-20-11 06:17 PM by friendly_iconoclast
That thread is chock-full of juicy goodness:

http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4745509#4745934

jpak (1000+ posts) Wed Feb-23-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #77
85. Law enforcement cannot compel you to break the law


http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4745509#4745652

jpak (1000+ posts) Wed Feb-23-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Did it ever occur to you that this story may be NRA teabagger agitprop???


http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4745509#4745696


jpak (1000+ posts) Wed Feb-23-11 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. No one is accusing the ATF of gunrunning


http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4745509#4745848

jpak (1000+ posts) Wed Feb-23-11 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #43
62. Republicans prevented the ATF from monitoring multiple US gun sales used by Mexican gunrunners
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Oneka Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Juicy Goodness
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
26. Quite the source you've got there.
Oh boy. Fox fucking news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC