Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just in: Holder lashes out at Congress over "Fast & Furious" scandal.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 05:42 PM
Original message
Just in: Holder lashes out at Congress over "Fast & Furious" scandal.
Edited on Fri Oct-07-11 05:43 PM by SteveM
"In a letter to Congress, Attorney General Eric Holder has gone on the record with the most details yet about what he and other Justice Department officials knew about ATF's Fast and Furious operation, even though memos surfaced earlier this week showing multiple briefing memos mentioning Fast and Furious were sent to him as early as July of last year.

"Holder says that his testimony to Congress, stating he first heard of Fast and Furious earlier this year, 'was truthful and accurate... I have no recollection of knowing about Fast and Furious prior to the public controversy about it.'"

A.G. Holder said further he cannnot sit idly by...

"as law enforcement and government employees who devote their lives to protecting our citizens be considered 'accessories to murder'."

Tellingly, Holder accused Congress of not acting to stop the "flow of guns to Mexico."

"Holder blamed Congress for failing to consider whether 'additional tools are needed to stem the flow of guns to Mexico' and warned 'until we move beyond the current political climate..nothing is going to change.'"

_____________________
Attorney General Holder seems to be locked into his position that there is a "flow of guns to Mexico" which must be acted upon, but does not indicate how such a flow would have been theoretically stopped even if these various BATF schemes had "succeeded."

He also speaks of a "political climate," but doesn't elaborate how this "climate" would prevent a "flow of guns." Given the amount of documentation, number of meetings concerning the "flow," and Holder's emotional investment in this issue, I don't find it credible when Holder claims he "has no recollection."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20117477-10391695.html
Refresh | +10 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Holder's actions are unquestionable and above reproach: he should never be impugned for
what he ever does or does not do. Should you not believe me, just ask him. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. The "climate" is a realization
That restricting firearms rights in the USA is a non-starter with the majority.

This "turn and attack" method isn't going to end well for AG Holder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Oneka Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. i didn't think it was possible
for a man of his obvious talents, to double down on stupid.

He just proved me wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Very intelligent and talented people often make that mistake
They start to believe they're the smartest people in the room and they can treat the rest of us with utter contempt because we're too stupid to matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Hence the term: "Too smart for their own good"
Many scientists have been spanked by their own smarts... It's step 3 that always gets them.

Step 1. Have a theory.
Step 2. Reach a conclusion.
Step 3. Stop thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. i have no recollection
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. I think the proper phrase is:
I have no recollection of these events SENATOR
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lurks Often Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Holder is either lying or incompetent
Holder, DOJ and ATF have been stalling, lying and misleading Congress to include overly redacted documents, slow responses or ignoring requests all together, the transfer of one or more people involved, including one to Iraq.

If he lied, I want him on trial for perjury. If he is so incompetent to be unaware of this program from the beginning, he has no business being in any position of authority in the government, much less the Attorney General.

I can only presume that whoever is making the political decisions is an idiot, that or there is even worse yet to be discovered. You DO NOT stall on something like this a year out from the Presidential election.
You bring it to the surface immediately, plead whatever you need to to avoid jail time and then do your best to make everybody forget it as soon as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hard to believe that my President hired this buffoon. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
razorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. I pray that's the only involvement the president had in this matter. Regardless,
although we have not yet heard accusations of White House involvement, they cannot be far behind, with Daryl Issa running the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is he still alive? I thought he had died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. additional tools = AWB the goal of F&F to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Pullo Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Seems likely
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Maybe
Holder can get the same guy to work on his pardon that Marc Rich did? Seems like that guy had selective memory problems as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. Someone woke up cranky. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
14. People in Mexico must be killed by gunfire, to prevent them from being killed by gunfire
Edited on Sat Oct-08-11 09:57 AM by slackmaster
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. "We had to destroy the village in order to save it..."
head-desk....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tejas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. "Holder blamed Congress...additional tools are needed" (don't look now, but...)
Edited on Sat Oct-08-11 10:41 AM by Tejas
Guess he "doesn't recall" the $50M+ in the Stimulus dedicated to ATF?

edit - $50,000,000 DOLLARS (and then some)

What on earth is happening here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Katya Mullethov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Those are monies
Tools are things borrowed and not returned , like special police powers .
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gravity556 Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. Aww, someone stepped on his crank in a public fashion...
And now he's all upset about it. That's correct, Mr Holder, the "climate" in the US is in no fucking mood for more gun control, particularly since you keep selling guns to dangerous drug organizations. Sure, *you* don't have much to worry about with your armed guards and armored cars, but the rest of us can't afford 10 or 15 million a year in personal protection details.

Also, that whole "America is responsible for arming the cartels!" whine isn't going to cut it. Not when it's Mexico's southern border that is the problem. They just need to enforce their northern border as strictly as their southern one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Katya Mullethov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
22. "Please allow me to retort "
Dear Attorney General Holder:

From the beginning of the congressional investigation into Operation Fast and Furious, the Department of Justice has offered a roving set of ever-changing explanations to justify its involvement in this reckless and deadly program. These defenses have been aimed at undermining the investigation. From the start, the Department insisted that no wrongdoing had occurred and asked Senator Grassley and me to defer our oversight responsibilities over its concerns about our purported interference with its ongoing criminal investigations. Additionally, the Department steadfastly insisted that gunwalking did not occur.

Once documentary and testimonial evidence strongly contradicted these claims, the Department attempted to limit the fallout from Fast and Furious to the Phoenix Field Division of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). When that effort also proved unsuccessful, the Department next argued that Fast and Furious resided only within ATF itself, before eventually also assigning blame to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Arizona. All of these efforts were designed to circle the wagons around DOJ and its political appointees.

To that end, just last month, you claimed that Fast and Furious did not reach the upper levels of the Justice Department. Documents discovered through the course of the investigation, however, have proved each and every one of these claims advanced by the Department to be untrue. It appears your latest defense has reached a new low. Incredibly, in your letter from Friday you now claim that you were unaware of Fast and Furious because your staff failed to inform you of information contained in memos that were specifically addressed to you. At best, this indicates negligence and incompetence in your duties as Attorney General. At worst, it places your credibility into serious doubt.

Following the Committee’s issuance of a subpoena over six months ago, I strongly believed that the Department would fully cooperate with Congress and support this investigation with all the means at its disposal. The American people deserve no less. Unfortunately, the Department’s cooperation to date has been minimal. Hundreds of pages of documents that have been produced to my Committee are duplicative, and hundreds more contain substantial redactions, rendering them virtually worthless. The Department has actively engaged in retaliation against multiple whistleblowers, and has, on numerous occasions, attempted to disseminate false and misleading information to the press in an attempt to discredit this investigation.

Your letter dated October 7 is deeply disappointing. Instead of pledging all necessary resources to assist the congressional investigation in discovering the truth behind the fundamentally flawed Operation Fast and Furious, your letter instead did little but obfuscate, shift blame, berate, and attempt to change the topic away from the Department’s responsibility in the creation, implementation, and authorization of this reckless program. You claim that, after months of silence, you “must now address these issues” over Fast and Furious because of the harmful discourse of the past few days. Yet, the only major development of these past few days has been the release of multiple documents showing that you and your senior staff had been briefed, on numerous occasions, about Fast and Furious.

The Mexican Cartels

A month after you became Attorney General, you spoke of the danger of the Mexican drug cartels, and the Sinaloa cartel in particular. The cartels, you said, “are lucrative, they are violent, and they are operated with stunning planning and precision.” You promised that under your leadership “these cartels will be destroyed.” You vowed that the Department of Justice would “continue to work with counterparts in Mexico, through information sharing, training and mutual cooperation to jointly fight these cartels, both in Mexico and the United States.”

Under your leadership, however, Operation Fast and Furious has proven these promises hollow. According to one agent, Operation Fast and Furious “armed the cartel. It is disgusting.” Fast and Furious simply served as a convenient means for dangerous cartels to acquire upwards of 2,000 assault-style weapons. On top of that, the Government of Mexico was not informed about Fast and Furious. In fact, DOJ and ATF officials actively engaged in hiding information about Fast and Furious from not only Mexican officials, but also U.S. law enforcement officials operating in Mexico for fear that they would inform their Mexican counterparts. This strategy is inapposite and contradicts the promises you made to the American people.

Your September 7, 2011 Statement

On September 7, 2011, you said that “he notion that reaches into the upper levels of the Justice Department is something that at this point I don't think is supported by the facts and I think once we examine it and once the facts are revealed we'll see that's not the case.” Unfortunately, the facts directly contradict this statement.

Lanny Breuer, the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, clearly a member of the Department’s senior leadership, knew about Fast and Furious as early as March 2010. In fact, I have learned that the amount of detail shared with Breuer’s top deputies about Fast and Furious is simply astounding.

For example, Manuel Celis-Acosta was the “biggest fish” of the straw purchasing ring in Phoenix. From the time the investigation started in September 2009 until March 15, 2010, Manuel Celis-Acosta acquired at least 852 firearms valued at around $500,000 through straw purchasers. Yet in 2009, Celis-Acosta reported an Arizona taxable income of only $15,475. Between September 2009 and late January 2010, 139 of these firearms were recovered, 81 in Mexico alone. Some of these firearms were recovered less than 24 hours after they were bought.

This information, and hundreds of pages worth of additional information, was included in highly detailed wiretap applications sent for authorization to Breuer’s top deputies. It is my understanding, the Department applied to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona for numerous wire taps from March 2010 to July 2010. These wire tap applications were reviewed and approved by several Deputy Assistant Attorney Generals, including Kenneth A. Blanco, John C. Keeney, and Jason M. Weinstein. Breuer’s top deputies approved these wiretap applications to be used against individuals associated with the known drug cartels. As I understand it, the wire tap applications contain rich detail of the reckless operational tactics being employed by your agents in Phoenix. Although Breuer and his top deputies were informed of the operational details and tactics of Fast and Furious, they did nothing to stop the program. In fact, on a trip to Mexico Breuer trumpeted Fast and Furious as a promising investigation.

Gary Grindler, the then-Deputy Attorney General and currently your Chief of Staff, received an extremely detailed briefing on Operation Fast and Furious on March 12, 2010. In this briefing, Grindler learned such minutiae as the number of times that Uriel Patino, a straw purchaser on food stamps who ultimately acquired 720 firearms, went in to a cooperating gun store and the amount of guns that he had bought. When former Acting ATF Director Ken Melson, a career federal prosecutor, learned similar information, he became sick to his stomach:

At the time of his briefing in March of last year, Grindler knew that Patino had purchased 313 weapons and paid for all of them in cash. Unlike Melson, Grindler clearly saw nothing wrong with this. If Grindler had had the sense to shut this investigation down right then, he could have prevented the purchase of an additional 407 weapons by Patino alone. Instead, Grindler did nothing to stop the program.

Following this briefing, it is clear that Grindler did one of two things. Either, he alerted you to the name and operational details of Fast and Furious, in which case your May 3, 2011 testimony in front of Congress was false; or, he failed to inform you of the name and the operational details of Fast and Furious, in which case Grindler engaged in gross dereliction of his duties as Acting Deputy Attorney General. It is fair to infer from the fact that Grindler remains as your Chief of Staff that he did not engage in gross dereliction of his duties and told you about the program as far back as March of 2010.

In the summer of 2010, at the latest, you were undoubtedly informed about Fast and Furious. On at least five occasions you were told of the connection between Fast and Furious and a specific Mexican cartel – the very cartel that you had vowed to destroy. You were informed that Manuel Celis-Acosta and his straw purchasers were responsible for the purchase of 1,500 firearms that were then supplied to Mexican drug trafficking cartels. Yet, you did nothing to stop this program.

You failed to own up to your responsibility to safeguard the American public by hiding behind “attorneys in your office and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General,” who you now claim did not bring this information to your attention. Holder Letter, supra note 1. As a result of your failure to act on these memos sent to you, nearly 500 additional firearms were purchased under Fast and Furious.

The facts simply do not support any claim that Fast and Furious did not reach the highest levels of the Justice Department. Actually, Fast and Furious did reach the ultimate authority in the Department – you.

Your May 3, 2011 Statement

On May 3, 2011, I asked you directly when you first knew about the operation known as Fast and Furious. You responded directly, and to the point, that you weren’t “sure of the exact date, but probably heard about Fast and Furious for the first time over the last few weeks.” This statement, made before Congress, has proven to be patently untrue. Documents released by the Department just last week showed that you received at least seven memos about Fast and Furious starting as early as July 2010.

In your letter Friday, you blamed your staff for failing to inform you about Operation Fast and Furious when they reviewed the memos sent to you last summer. Your staff, therefore, was certainly aware of Fast and Furious over a year ago. Lanny Breuer was aware of Fast and Furious as early as March 2010, and Gary Grindler was also aware of Fast and Furious as early as March 2010. Given this frequency of high level involvement with Fast and Furious as much as a year prior to your May 3, 2011 testimony, it simply is not believable that you were not briefed on Fast and Furious until a few weeks before your testimony. At the very least, you should have known about Fast and Furious well before then. The current paper trail, which will only grow more robust as additional documents are discovered, creates the strong perception that your statement in front of Congress was less than truthful.

The February 4, 2011 Letter

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of this intransigence is that the Department of Justice has been lying to Congress ever since the inquiry into Fast and Furious began. On February 4, 2011, Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich wrote that “ATF makes every effort to interdict weapons that have been purchased illegally and prevent their transport into Mexico.” This letter, vetted by both the senior ranks of ATF as well as the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, is a flat-out lie.

As we understand it, in March 2010, top deputies to Lanny Breuer were informed that law enforcement officers intercepted calls that demonstrated that Manuel Celis-Acosta was conspiring to purchase and transport firearms for the purpose of trafficking the firearms from the United States into Mexico. Not only was ATF aware of this information, but so was the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. This information was shared with the Criminal Division. All of these organizations are components of the Department of Justice, and they were all aware of the illegal purchase of firearms and their eventual transportation into Mexico.

These firearms were not interdicted. They were not stopped. Your agents allowed these firearms purchases to continue, sometimes even monitoring them in person, and within days some of these weapons were being recovered in Mexico. Despite widespread knowledge within its senior ranks that this practice was occurring, when asked on numerous occasions about the veracity of this letter, the Department has shockingly continued to stand by its false statement of February 4, 2011.

Mr. Attorney General, you have made numerous statements about Fast and Furious that have eventually been proven to be untrue. Your lack of trustworthiness while speaking about Fast and Furious has called into question your overall credibility as Attorney General. The time for deflecting blame and obstructing our investigation is over. The time has come for you to come clean to the American public about what you knew about Fast and Furious, when you knew it, and who is going to be held accountable for failing to shut down a program that has already had deadly consequences, and will likely cause more casualties for years to come.

Operation Fast and Furious was the Department’s most significant gun trafficking case. It related to two of your major initiatives – destroying the Mexican cartels and reducing gun violence on both sides of the border. On your watch, it went spectacularly wrong. Whether you realize yet or not, you own Fast and Furious. It is your responsibility.

Sincerely,
Darrell Issa
Chairman


"Better give your soul to Jesus , cuz your ass is mine ."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
burf Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Thank you for posting the letter.
Yet, there are those posting that the gun running programs were just small time operations. In the letter, Issa spells out the straw purchasing of over 1500 weapons by two people. How many more purchasers were there? Does the ATF have any idea of how many in total were shipped to Mexico? Do I really think they would disclose those numbers?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Oooh, that's gonna leave a mark....
Holder wouldn't have looked any worse if he had turned to Obama and said, "Hold my beer and watch this..."

"Incredibly, in your letter from Friday you now claim that you were unaware of Fast and Furious because your staff failed to inform you of information contained in memos that were specifically addressed to you. At best, this indicates negligence and incompetence in your duties as Attorney General. At worst, it places your credibility into serious doubt."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Stick a fork in him, hes done.
Edited on Tue Oct-11-11 10:02 AM by beevul
He'll be very lucky if he serves no time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
23. Anger: 2nd stage of dealing with a terminal illness .

First there was denial. Fast and Furious wasn't so bad.

Now Anger.

Soon he will try to bargain. Offer up a lower level person to take the fall. Make some kind of deal to avoid more serious consequences.

Then depression. We won't hear from him for a while.

And finally acceptance. He will admit all the wrong doing or resign.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I'd be satisfied with the traditional Japanese method of expunging shame of failure.
But I doubt we get that lucky...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
chrisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
27. We will beat them by giving them weapons to fight us with.
Herp derp
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC