Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Britney Spears (rude toter) needs to apologize to the UK.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 07:41 AM
Original message
Britney Spears (rude toter) needs to apologize to the UK.
Edited on Tue Sep-27-11 07:47 AM by ileus
http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2011/09/britney-spears-under-the-gun-for-heist-video/

At issue? The gun-toting video shoot's lawlessness and weapon-wielding.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/26/britney-spears-hackney-council-criminal_n_980768.html

Spears, who filmed her armed robbery-themed video for "Criminal" in Stoke Newington, is under fire from the London borough constituency's local government for the shoot's lawlessness and weapon-wielding.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2011/09/26/britney-spears-asked-to-apologize-for-music-video-gun/

“I stick by my comments which were supported by young people also interviewed at the time. Gun crime has been reducing in the Hackney area. We don’t need some celeb running around with a handgun in a public street stirring things up again," Rathbone says. "What she did was illegal as she had not sought permission for what was apparently a late change of script and she also needed to notify the local police who would have wanted to have been present in such a situation. She is encouraging a lifestyle of crime, get something for nothing, or use a gun to get your way.



Look the pop princess exporting American gun values. :)


Europeans.........


What do you think? Please leave a comment...
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. good to see some adults in charge - not some over-hyped celeb
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. Yeah, it's not like it was a music video or something..
Oh wait...nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. so you see no harm possible from irresponsible videos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #48
57. Asked a number of other times in this thread
Are they going to require that Daniel Craig and the makers of the Bond movies apologize to the local communities they film in?

There is about as much responsibility as there is from any cops and robber tv shows or any movie or documentary that shows gun usage. It's just the entertainment industy. Are you going to demonize all of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Where does she carry it?
Edited on Tue Sep-27-11 08:59 AM by TheCowsCameHome
She's usually half naked, plus she'a a fucking airhead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
We_Have_A_Problem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. You say that like its a BAD thing....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't think its her gun values they need to be worried about...


Why would anyone take anything she did seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
76. Well, given that posture, maybe SHE is the gun. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
79. I see she is in position to tell the UK to kiss her ass
which is what she should say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder how much money that shoot brought into the area?
And I wonder if people shooting James Bond flicks in London get the same kind of grief?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. so money trumps, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Doesn't it always? Money talks, everything else walks. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Trumps what?
Edited on Tue Sep-27-11 09:23 AM by Atypical Liberal
Money trumps what?

Getting upset over a music video when countless other movies have been shot in the UK involving guns?

Yes, I'd say money trumps that.

And note one of the things they are extorting, er, asking Britney Spears for is a "sizeable donation".

Looks like money does play a part, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. a donation to
compensate "for the rudeness and damage she's done to this community."

Sounds reasonable to me - she (and her minions) want to come in, brandish their guns recklessly in a video, pack up and leave the damage for the adults to clean up. All the while racking up more money for her over-indulgences.

Hardly extortion.




Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I wonder how many James Bond movies they hit up for their rudeness and damage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. So you apply a price to freedom of speech.....
how very, very progressive of you.

Fuck. That. Noise.

P.S. Do you really think they had real guns... in England? Seriously? I thought fear-mongering was for the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. how routine - "it was just a fake gun after all - no harm done"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. You seem to be conflating a filming set with actual criminals.
That's completely dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Fertilizer....
First it was a REPLICA gun. Second, thus no actual shots were fired. Third, what precise damage did she do "for the adults to clean up"?

The producers of the next Bond film should tell "British officials " that no further filming will be done in the UK account their opposition to “promoting gun violence” on film or video. For that matter, ALL films or video guilty of “promoting gun violence” should be filmed outside the UK. And all those jobs and taxes can go elsewhere, I bet the UK unions will just love that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. those are lame excuses - just more gun deification
Edited on Tue Sep-27-11 12:17 PM by DrDan
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Double fertilizer
Losing jobs, and the taxes that go with them are real concrete facts. Gun Prohibitionist propaganda doesn't produce jobs, except for those paid shills funded by the Joyce Foundation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Since you can not support your assertion with evidence....
it means that assertion is pure bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. refreshing to see adults as local government leaders - isn't it
Edited on Tue Sep-27-11 01:43 PM by DrDan
calling out the irresponsible as irresponsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. "responsible" for WHAT? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. irresponsible behavior, obviously
some have difficulty recognizing it
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
We_Have_A_Problem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. Apparently so....
...All i see was the responsible behavior of using a prop gun to film a music video, rather than using a real one.

Nothing irresponsible about that at all.

As I said, if someone is so much of a pussy that the mere sight of a fake gun during what was obviously a video shoot causes them some kind of mental distress, that person isn't worth the air they breathe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #38
46. a video showing someone brandishing a weapon - whether a prop or real - glamorizing
Edited on Tue Sep-27-11 02:33 PM by DrDan
gangs and gun violence is irresponsible. And in an area where half the youth deaths are attibuted to guns and knives

or do you support such behavior?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
We_Have_A_Problem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. Simple
I know the difference between real and fake, and i recognize that entertainment is just that - entertainment. I do not stupidly believe that it is harmful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. just because you do doesn't mean it is not potentially harmful to others
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. *Again* with the claim of "moral harm". It was bullshit when Robert Bork came up with it...
...(or rather stole it from Frederic Wertham's Seduction of The Innocent), and it's bullshit now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
We_Have_A_Problem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. Yeah it pretty much does.
Just because someone else is too stupid to tell the difference between real and fake doesn't mean there was any harm done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #46
64. I'm sure you have seen this video....
and can explain how it accomplished the things you claim, amIright?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #46
65. "And in an area where half the youth deaths are attibuted to guns and knives"
And in an area where guns and knives are heavily regulated or banned.

How do you explain this happening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
78. Don't mention "fertilizer" after that move she made. Jeez. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
We_Have_A_Problem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. What damage?
Edited on Tue Sep-27-11 02:02 PM by We_Have_A_Problem
Just because some simpleton got scared doesn't mean there has been any damages.

I mean, really, if you're so much of a pussy that the mere sight of a prop gun makes you wet your pants, and you're so stupid you cannot tell from the plethora of cameras that there was some filming going on, then quite frankly, you're not worth the air you breathe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. "leave the damage for the adults to clean up"? What "damage"?
They shot a music video, they didn't do a drive by. You think they damaged the public morality just by being there? The safe, gun-free UK is now tainted and sullied because someone might have seen a weapon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. obviously those in the UK recognize the glamorization of gun violence for what it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. That's a weak and absolutely ridiculous argument.
And I'm not at all surprised that you fall back on claiming that something false is actually "obvious" as an alternative to actually debating using facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #39
49. Moral harm? Amazing the number of Robert Bork fans you can find at DU:
Edited on Tue Sep-27-11 02:42 PM by friendly_iconoclast
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=118&topic_id=335504#335606

friendly_iconoclast (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-18-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
43. Strange seeing Robert Bork's theory of moral harm espoused at DU
For those unfamiliar with it, Dan Baum's recent article in Harper's related this to the objection to open carry:

...My friends who are appalled by the thought of widespread concealed weapons aren't impressed by this argument, or by the research demonstrating no ill effects of the shall-issue revolution. "I don't care," said one. "I don't feel safe knowing that people are walking around with guns. What about my right to feel safe? Doesn't that count for anything?"

Robert Bork tried out that argument in 1971, in defense of prosecuting such victimless crimes as drug abuse, writing in the Indiana Law Journal that “knowledge that an activity is taking place is a harm to those who find it profoundly immoral.”

It’s as bad an argument now as it was then. We may not like it that other people are doing things we revile—smoking pot, enjoying pornography, making gay love, or carrying a gun—but if we aren’t adversely affected by it, the Constitution and common decency argue for leaving it alone. My friend may feel less safe because people are wearing concealed guns, but the data suggest she isn't less safe....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #49
80. but what ceased to be amazing a long time ago
is the number of times a minute one sees misrepresentation in the Guns forum.

The master at work in that one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
77. Dr. Watson's Webley occasionally cleared up a bit of extortion. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
73. Trumps pissy pearl-clutching? Sure thing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Remmah2 Donating Member (971 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is news? nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes.
It's in the Gungeon. It must be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. in a word -
no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. She's not a rude toter.
A rude toter is someone who routinely carries a loaded handgun and actually uses it in self-defense against a street thug. Her gun was almost certainly a plastic stage prop that can't fire real bullets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. but she was being rude to European society with her vulgar display of a firearm shaped device.
Edited on Tue Sep-27-11 09:54 AM by ileus
maybe I should have said rude toter wannabe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Remmah2 Donating Member (971 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. She certainly makes a fashion statement.
Unfortunatly I don't know what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. Well, what do you expect her to do -- work for a living?
Edited on Tue Sep-27-11 10:25 AM by rocktivity
The Madonna Express, I call it: when you have to substitute sensationalism, sex appeal, and controversy for talent. You have to keep topping yourself idea-wise, so it's inevitable that you crash into a wall.

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. We need someone that lives in Europe to chime in here...maybe a controlist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Remmah2 Donating Member (971 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Mike and the Pope are doing lunch today. nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I just read over in another post Mikeb is king ruler...or something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
43. He's being fitted for a new blue helmet over at the UN
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #43
66. Huh, I would have guessed it was purple.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. I just thought it was blue because of this
http://serr8d.blogspot.com/2010/11/mikeb302000-anti-gun-blogger-is-united.html

Seeing as how he works at the United Nations World Food Program
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. Over reaction
on the part of the authorities but when in Rome...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. but when in Rome - act responsibly
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
We_Have_A_Problem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. There was nothing irresponsible. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. matter of opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
We_Have_A_Problem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. True....
but an educated opinion from an adult will note there was no harm done and no lack of responsible behavior...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. that I am my friend - got the paper to prove it
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. "Knowledge that an activity is taking place is a harm to those who find it profoundly immoral.”
Being an educated person, I take it you can explain the method by which Ms. Spear's use of replica firearms in a video shoot caused harm to all those poor Britons. We eagerly await your reply...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #50
75. I guess he's still researching, possibly at the Anslinger-Wertham Institute...
...For The Study of Moral Panic-Mongering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #35
55. Basically faux poutrage to try and score some free money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
45. True that.
Their town, their rules. Celebs same as every else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
41. So do they censor movies over there that have guns in them?
Maybe put a super R rating on them or maybe even X rating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hoyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
58. I can understand how UK might not want us to export our bad gun habits and "values." Values?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. Haven't seen "Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels", I take it?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120735/

The observant reader will note that the director, writer, and entire cast are British, and it was filmed in London.
I guess it's only offensive and harmful when us rude Yanks do it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Straw Man Donating Member (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #60
72. Or "Hot Fuzz," for that matter.
Edited on Tue Sep-27-11 08:52 PM by Straw Man
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Yeah, tell that to Ian Flemming and the makers of the Bond movies
Those guys that open each movies looking down the barrel of a gun, a handgun no less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hoyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. "Bond" and similar Movies? What do fantasies have to do with gun politics?

Well, beyond the fear that one needs a gun on a regular basis, or that the only way to defend oneself is with a tricked out gun or two strapped to one's body.

Bond movies and whatever our buddy above you enjoys watching really have nothing to do with gun politics and the desirability of guns in public. Next thing, someone will suggest reading the right wing bible, "Turner Diaries."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. About as much as music videos should....this is just a shakedown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #62
67. Do you think through you posts before typing and hitting the submit button
""Bond" and similar Movies? What do fantasies have to do with gun politics?"

What do Brittany Spears videos have to do with gun politics?

"a tricked out gun or two strapped to one's body."

Ahhh, I knew you could get your shtick in there somewhere. Why are you always so worried about everyone else's bodies. Is it a fetish of yours?

"Bond movies and whatever our buddy above you enjoys watching really have nothing to do with gun politics and the desirability of guns in public."

So let's rewrite that statement: Brittany Spears videos really have nothing to do with gun politics and the desirability of guns in public.

See how that works?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #62
68.  Hoyt, what is a "tricked out gun"? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. I think he confuses tricked out with
steampunk

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
59. Here's a photo of the Crime Against Humanity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #59
71. Wow, she looks old
and that gun is totally fake. It looks like plastic from here
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Marengo Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #59
74. Sigh, time in a GULAG would really help that lost soul.
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC