|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
virginia mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:03 PM Original message |
Mass gun confiscations HAVE occurred in the US....Why Gun Registration is a complete NO GO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HERVEPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. Tough Crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virginia mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. This is why my guns are NOT registered... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. so, you're NOT a law-abiding gun owner? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virginia mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Actually I am in full complance with the law... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
45. How refreshing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:55 PM Response to Reply #45 |
54. ???? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 04:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. I believe gun registration is against the law in Florida ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 07:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
29. Most states do not require registration. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:44 AM Response to Reply #29 |
116. And that is a good thing. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 07:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
31. Based on court law, criminals don't have to register their firearms, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:31 PM Response to Reply #31 |
47. Brilliant! Let anarchy rule. But I agree that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 08:24 AM Response to Reply #47 |
78. No, guns should not be registered. The only use of such a system in the US is confiscation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
right2bfree (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 12:35 AM Response to Reply #78 |
143. Whats wrong with getting guns out of the hands of those who are unfit? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 01:28 AM Response to Reply #143 |
146. Nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 07:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
33. You are ignorant of the law, it seems... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 12:34 AM Response to Reply #2 |
142. Deleted message |
mysuzuki2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. This is why NOBODY wants to talk to the gun control side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Eloquent! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 07:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
27. "Tough crap". Its interesting to see how progressive some really are when rights get trampled. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 07:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
30. May I have a list of all your books and papers, please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. Sounds like registration false under the "well-regulated militia" clause. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. Well regulated = Properly functioning... Not control something by making it subject to rules or laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 08:11 AM Response to Reply #12 |
75. How do you make it function properly without ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 10:32 AM Response to Reply #75 |
88. The militia regulates itself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:23 AM Response to Reply #75 |
91. Look at it like this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. Deleted message |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Here is the funny thing about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. There is no federal registration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. Questions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starboard Tack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
46. To what end? To make fools accountable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 06:36 AM Response to Reply #46 |
70. You realize they can already do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
22. Deleted message |
KaoriMitsubishi (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
6. Owners of unregistered guns should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:19 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. You do realize that most states do *NOT* require the registration of all firearms... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Do *NOT* require. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:32 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. tnx... edited. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 04:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
24. Owners of cars that are stolen and used in a crime should also get life in prison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 07:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
34. Inventing new crimes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YllwFvr (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
8. How does gun registration help again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. IF someone registers their gun, AND they use it in a crime, AND they leave the gun behind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Personally, I see many downsides that outweigh the benefit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. It does not help... At all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YllwFvr (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 09:27 PM Response to Reply #23 |
37. I was aware of some of those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flyboy_451 (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 09:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
41. might check the source on the Bush quote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:09 AM Response to Reply #41 |
90. Good catch... Times change... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 07:23 AM Response to Reply #8 |
73. How many billions spent in Canada ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YllwFvr (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 08:06 AM Response to Reply #73 |
74. They can't point to a single arrest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
21. Haynes v. United States, 1968... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
26. Good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 07:12 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Maybe we should advocate confiscating your computer to silence your speech too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 09:37 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Im not typing on a military computer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:40 PM Response to Reply #38 |
50. But you *could*, if so inclined, use it to commit crimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:49 PM Response to Reply #38 |
51. And the number of military firearms in private hands is vanishingly small. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Scribe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 03:10 AM Response to Reply #38 |
67. Um, isn't the www based on a military network? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 06:49 PM Response to Reply #67 |
102. Yep. The Internet is an outgrowth of ARPANET, started by the Defense Department. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:57 PM Response to Reply #102 |
114. Oh noes1!1!!1!11! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 09:00 AM Response to Reply #102 |
119. The Internet was designed to be resistant to nuclear attacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 09:52 AM Response to Reply #38 |
86. What's a "military" computer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 07:16 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. What "military weapons" are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 09:38 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. All military weapons from assault rifles on up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virginia mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 09:55 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Your obviously not military... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:02 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. You mean the 'civilian' AR15 rifles that have turned Mexico into a violent hellhole? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:34 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. AR15s are banned for civilians in Mexico, IIRC. How's that working out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:59 PM Response to Reply #48 |
57. Deleted message |
friendly_iconoclast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:06 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. That's your second strawman argument in less than an hour. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:45 PM Response to Reply #59 |
64. You dont know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 08:15 AM Response to Reply #64 |
77. Cite to evidence, please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 12:08 PM Response to Reply #77 |
92. You'll see clear video of a live chupacabra before you see *that* evidence n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 06:01 PM Response to Reply #92 |
99. **Snort** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burrfoot (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 12:50 AM Response to Reply #99 |
145. By ass*oles with assault weapons, no less!!!1!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 09:31 AM Response to Reply #64 |
84. Total fabrication and dishonesty in your post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:52 PM Response to Reply #43 |
52. I'm not sure you know what you are talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:00 PM Response to Reply #52 |
58. That is where I got my information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:20 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Then it seems you did not understand it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:41 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. I understand the part that says it was designed for military use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straw Man (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 12:09 AM Response to Reply #63 |
65. You missed this part... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 12:12 AM Response to Reply #63 |
66. I can't think of a gun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 07:14 AM Response to Reply #66 |
72. What part of 'from assault rifles on up' do you not understand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 08:14 AM Response to Reply #72 |
76. You need to look up the definition of "assault rifle". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 08:48 AM Response to Reply #72 |
80. You don't have a clue what you're writing about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 09:52 AM Response to Reply #72 |
85. What part of vanishingly rare do you not undetstand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #72 |
94. You do know that "assault rifles" are fully automatic don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewMoonTherian (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 03:57 AM Response to Reply #63 |
69. This is where we reach our impasse then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 07:13 AM Response to Reply #69 |
71. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewMoonTherian (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 10:07 AM Response to Reply #71 |
87. I didn't make myself entirely clear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:44 PM Response to Reply #87 |
97. Your fantasy of taking on the US military is absurd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewMoonTherian (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:53 PM Response to Reply #97 |
98. It's clearly absurd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 07:21 PM Response to Reply #98 |
103. You want to pit civilians against 'We the people?' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 07:46 PM Response to Reply #103 |
105. Um... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 07:48 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. So, liberals are pushing for a total armed society? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 07:50 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. Who here has that objective? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 10:58 PM Response to Reply #107 |
110. Havent you heard the news? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewMoonTherian (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:07 PM Response to Reply #110 |
111. Now, to be fair, I never advocated for a total armed society. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 10:34 AM Response to Reply #111 |
121. "Now, to be fair, I never advocated for a total armed society." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:19 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. You need to produce a quote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 10:32 AM Response to Reply #112 |
120. oops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 10:35 AM Response to Reply #112 |
122. OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 11:03 AM Response to Reply #122 |
129. Oh, sorry. You can read. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewMoonTherian (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 10:01 PM Response to Reply #122 |
140. I've terribly miscommunicated my position, I'm afraid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:27 PM Response to Reply #106 |
134. It's hard to defend hyperbole isn't it? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewMoonTherian (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 10:42 PM Response to Reply #103 |
109. Wow. You've actually given me a good bit to think about. Thanks for the post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 06:03 PM Response to Reply #97 |
100. Better tell some South-Western Asian yahoos... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 08:49 AM Response to Reply #63 |
81. All firearms were originally designed for military use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 07:42 PM Response to Reply #81 |
104. See: 'Asssault rifles on up' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 07:52 PM Response to Reply #104 |
108. Define "assault rifle". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 08:57 AM Response to Reply #104 |
118. Military assault rifles are capable of automatic or burst fire, and are therefore strictly regulated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 08:59 AM Response to Reply #63 |
83. So was the bolt action rifle, the lever action repeater, the semi auto rifle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:40 PM Response to Reply #83 |
139. Don't forget the Brown Bess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:04 PM Response to Reply #63 |
96. The name "AR-15" got applied to different designs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:15 AM Response to Reply #63 |
115. Colt marketed the M16 to military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:25 PM Response to Reply #43 |
61. More here.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one-eyed fat man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 08:57 AM Response to Reply #43 |
82. You every study any history? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 06:37 PM Response to Reply #43 |
101. All guns were originally designed for military use. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:57 PM Response to Reply #39 |
55. Again, specifics, please...? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 08:21 PM Response to Reply #26 |
36. The police and military would have a hard time doing their jobs if that happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 09:38 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. The police and military arent civilians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:54 PM Response to Reply #40 |
53. Police are most definitely 'civilians'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 10:36 AM Response to Reply #53 |
123. Now you are grasping at straws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 11:08 AM Response to Reply #123 |
131. I merely stated a fact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:46 PM Response to Reply #131 |
133. I state fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:29 PM Response to Reply #133 |
135. This is one of the rare instances where I must disagree with a dictionary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 05:12 PM Response to Reply #135 |
137. Your beef isn't with me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 10:59 AM Response to Reply #137 |
152. Feel free to place yourself subordinate to the UCMJ at any time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:57 PM Response to Reply #40 |
56. Actually the police are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Scribe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 03:11 AM Response to Reply #40 |
68. Oh dear, you are not good at this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 10:38 AM Response to Reply #68 |
125. Deleted message |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 08:39 AM Response to Reply #40 |
79. Goalpost move, and police are in fact civilians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 10:37 AM Response to Reply #79 |
124. So, arming the cops = a 'police state?' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 10:40 AM Response to Reply #124 |
126. Perhaps the tought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 10:42 AM Response to Reply #126 |
127. Lets compromise then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 10:59 AM Response to Reply #127 |
128. Well what would you call it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 11:04 AM Response to Reply #128 |
130. I call it 'not anarchy' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 11:22 AM Response to Reply #130 |
132. It is hardly a fantasy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 05:20 PM Response to Reply #132 |
138. Fantasy, delusion, whichever... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:09 AM Response to Reply #138 |
150. Is observation of verifyable facts defined by fantasy or delusion in your book? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:35 PM Response to Reply #26 |
62. Seriously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
right2bfree (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 12:39 AM Response to Reply #26 |
144. Exactly. CA and NY have done a pretty good job on assault weapons. But... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #144 |
147. Why do "we need a new AW ban"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneshooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 05:57 PM Response to Reply #147 |
156. Don't hpld your breath waiting for an answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:44 AM Response to Reply #144 |
151. Congress won't pass it. It won't even get out of committees. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virginia mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 02:51 PM Response to Reply #144 |
154. I bet you cannot even correctly DEFINE an "AW" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 02:57 PM Response to Reply #154 |
155. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
28. gun registration systems can't be used to solve crimes or in court due to the 5th which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:12 PM Response to Reply #28 |
44. So vehicle registration systems can't be used to solve crimes due to the 5th? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 10:36 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. And here I'd thought certain other posters had used up all the straw. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 12:26 PM Response to Reply #44 |
93. link to a case in which vehicle registration was used to prosecute a criminal please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
89. That's why people who want outright gun bans go for total registration first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 03:43 PM Response to Reply #89 |
95. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:49 PM Response to Reply #95 |
113. And for some reason, they think we won't notice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 03:30 PM Response to Reply #113 |
136. Of course they'll always retort with: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xela (787 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
117. Disturbing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
right2bfree (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
141. Pretty simple, folks. If you like your guns, California is not the place to go!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 01:34 AM Response to Reply #141 |
148. That too will change. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewMoonTherian (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 01:44 AM Response to Reply #141 |
149. That's always been my philosophy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:04 AM Response to Reply #141 |
153. Your disdain for Constitutional Rights is noted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 04:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC