Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican bill would let gun owners carry concealed weapons without permits (Maine)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:15 AM
Original message
Republican bill would let gun owners carry concealed weapons without permits (Maine)
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 10:16 AM by jpak
http://www.wgme.com/newsroom/top_stories/videos/wgme_vid_6978.shtml\

A Maine lawmaker wants to make it easier for Mainers to carry around guns by stripping down the concealed weapons laws.

Under current Maine law, legal gun owners can bring their guns at most places in public, as long as they're exposed and out in the open. Gun owners tried to draw attention to Maine's open carry law in April 2010 when a University of Maine student staged a demonstration where people could show up with their guns legally displayed on their persons.

Under current Maine law, if your gun is exposed, you don't need to have your permit with you. But if it's concealed you need to have a permit to present on demand.

Now, Republican Representative Dale Crafts moran of Lisbon wants to change the law for gun owners so they only need to bring their permit when they're at places like a polling place or school.

<more>

This asshole republican law serves no useful purpose.

nope

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Makes sense to me. What's logical about requiring a permit when the gun can be carried without it?
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 10:24 AM by OneTenthofOnePercent
The pistol can be alternatively carried without a permit to begin with. Seems like a waste of police/state resources to maintain a permit and record system that doesn't necessarily do anything. The state might as well save money if people don;t need to buy those licenses anyways.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvccd1000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. +1 (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Asshole republicans want guns in schools, town meetings, libraries, polling places for political
intimidation.

We are not experiencing a crime wave in Maine

There is no rash of car jacking

Mugging

Hold ups

etc.

This is about political intimidation

period
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Those poor Vermonters, so intimidated....
or... NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Why do you feel that adequete self defense is a partisan issue?
Yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Republicans/teabaggers want guns everywhere to intimidate that's why
This has nothing to do with self defense

nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. There is no partisan correlation. How do you know democrats don't want to intimidate others?
Hell, you haven't even established that carrying a CONCEALED gun (let alone wearing it visibly) is actually "intimidation"... because no court in america has yet stated this axiom of your argument.

In not so many words... Your viewpoint is baseless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Asshole Republicans nationwide are sponsoring these stupid gun and anti-union bills
the same big steaming pile of republican shit

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Blind squirrels find nuts all the time. I don't care if Oompa Loompas sponsor it, what's your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. It's republican policy and it sucks
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Civil rights suck... gotcha.
Thanks for clarifying

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Trampling my rights - yup
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Anytime, partner (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. What is that supposed to mean - partner?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
39. It means we will trample your imaginary rights, with enumerated civil rights anytime.
Anytime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. The 9th and 10th amendments are imaginary? - who knew?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Maybe if you READ them, you would understand how an incorporated, enumerated civil right
trumps states.

Keep laughing. It looks good on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. I read them and understand them - the Founders put them there for a reason
So no one can trample on your rights that aren't specified

The Holy 2A does not trump all

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. The 2nd IS a specification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #43
65. Please show where in the 9th and 10th amemdments
where is says you have a right to not be around a gun.

Go ahead, I'll wait,

and wait

and wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armueller2001 Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #43
79. In that case
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 09:38 PM by armueller2001
i will claim the 9th and 10th give me the right to not be around screaming kids. I will demand from the nearest police officer that he arrest the parents for violating my rights.

No but seriously, you do have the right to not be around people with (legal) guns. Just move to Illinois, or don't leave your house. No one is forcing you to go to the store or the movie theater, or anywhere in public for that matter. You have the right to CHOOSE FOR YOURSELF! Isn't freedom awesome?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #43
85. Those amendments don't forbid carrying guns.
Nor do they grant you a right to not be around them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
38. Concealed weapons don't intimidate.
If you can see it, it isn't concealed.

If you can't see it, how can you be intimidated by it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
59. Cite to evidence, or cease your bullshit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DWC Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
63. jpak - Was I Wrong?
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 03:46 PM by DWC
I recently wrote that, though our positions on gun issues were polar opposites, you maintained the High Road in the debate and had earned my respect.

I am a conservative which does not make me a Republican and I support the Tea Party Movement which does not make me homosexual.

Your comments here are repugnant.

Concerning "teabaggers". I do know several and they are all active, homosexual Democrats.

Semper Fi,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #63
73. Dear DWC
This is Democraticunderground.com - I can't speak for all, but we do not support the tea party.

Teabagger is what most people here call tea partyiers

Please don't let on that you support the tea party - it's against the rules
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DWC Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. Dear JPAK
You are absolutely correct. This is DEMOCRATICunderground.com and no one can speak for all.

I was a registered Democrat for a significant portion of my life and did not leave the party. The party left me. A significant percentage of Tea Party Movement supporters are in exactly the same position.

I participate in this site because I am wise enough to know that the political Right is NOT all right and the political Left is Not all wrong. On this site I am privileged to thoughts and perspectives from all political persuasions which leads to better understanding.

However vulgar, denegrating statements from any source is beneath the dignity of this site and civility in general. No matter how much we may disagree, such language is not appropriate.

Semper Fi,

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. Teabaggers have called themselves teabaggers - and most people on DU refer to them as teabaggers
that's the way it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DWC Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #76
87. I must agree
Any self-described "teabagger" is probably proud of the moniker and may carry the title like The Red Badge of Courage. However, I have never encountered one participating in a Tea Party Movement event.

Semper Fi,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
64. But if they're concealed
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 04:59 PM by rl6214
and that's what this story is about, right, then how can you be intimidated by something that isn't even seen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #64
69.  Because He/She/It believes that they are there, and so He/She/It is skeered. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. "We are not experiencing a crime wave in Maine "
And yet Maine has one of the highest rates of gun ownership, allows people to open carry, and does not have strict anti-gun laws.

And the Brady Campaign only gave them 1 star.

http://www.bradycampaign.org/xshare/bcam/stategunlaws/scorecard/StateRatings.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Exactly - we do not need people running around with unlicensed concealed handguns in schools/polls
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 11:01 AM by jpak
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. Because that one thing would somehow reverse everything else
this trend of lots of guns/low crime would suddenly be reversed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. This bill will not be well received by Mane law enforcement
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. Because THAT matters, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. It does and it undermines the stupid NRA argument that more concealed guns = more public safety
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Have you ever talked to a beat cop about private citizens carrying legal weapons?
I bet you haven't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Just wait for the public hearings on the republican POS bill
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_B_Jackson Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #48
56. Why? Are you going to appear, and threaten to hold your breath
until this bill is dropped?

You realize that after you pass out, you'll start breathing again, right?
Still, I guess there might be some interest in watching how many shades of blue you turned.

Yup.

Yup.

Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. I just left messages with my state senator and rep. - both Dems. That's why we have them
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #60
66. Well done
while I oppose your point of view you are FINALLY DOING SOMETHING rather than whining, moaning, bitching and complaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
41. What do you base that conclusion on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
52. Do you realize how often you change your arguments?
Almost as if you have a weak position that you are desperately trying to defend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
54. Also I think many cops would oppose
search and seizure restrictions, miranda rights, and various criteria for entering evidence in to a trial.

Do you still think we should do whatever the cops say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #26
55. Let's look at the arguments:
More guns will cause crime: actually Maine has a high gun ownership rate and low crime.

Guns kill children: actually guns are very low on the list of things that kill children.

Well the intent of guns is evil: actually the intent doesn't really matter whatsoever.

Well concealed guns cause more crime: actually concealed gun holders are generally the least likely to commit crimes.

Well cops won't like it: actually there is no evidence for that and even if there were it wouldn't be justification for limiting 2nd amendment rights.

Well I'm scared shitless of guns for some reason: well ok I'll give you that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speltwon Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
72. By actual line officers or by "chiefs associations"?
The former generally strongly support concealed carry. Chiefs, who are political animals, support whatever their masters (Mayors etc.) do, generally speaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #26
88. Every patrol officer I have ever talked with is in favor of civilian concealed carry.
Because of my job I know a bunch of Dallas Country Deputy Sheriffs. All support the CHL program. They love it when some criminal tries to rob the wrong person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. Concealed weapons don't intimidate.
Otherwise, they aren't concealed, are they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. do you really think that your running commentary helps your cause?
do you really think that you are winning friends and influencing people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I think that republican/teabagger gun laws are a threat to civil society and political discourse
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. I hate that you find the need to qualify your statements with such
childish terminology. I hate it when Dems and Repubs resort to such childishness but, thats just me. yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Nothing childsh about that - teabaggers bring loaded guns to Obama political rallies
yup

Man Carrying Loaded Assault Rifle Attends Obama Protest

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-5248889-504083.html

PHOENIX (AP) About a dozen people carrying guns, including one with a military-style rifle, milled among protesters outside the convention center where President Barack Obama was giving a speech Monday — the latest incident in which protesters have openly displayed firearms near the president.

Gun-rights advocates say they're exercising their constitutional right to bear arms and protest, while those who argue for more gun control say it could be a disaster waiting to happen.

Phoenix police said the gun-toters at Monday's event, including the man carrying an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle slung over his shoulder, didn't need permits. No crimes were committed, and no one was arrested.

The man with the rifle declined to be identified but told The Arizona Republic that he was carrying the assault weapon because he could. "In Arizona, I still have some freedoms," he said.

<more>

Gun-Toting Man Draws Scrutiny Outside Obama Town Hall

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-5235445-503544.html

New Hampshire state law is pretty clear about protecting its citizens' rights to carry firearms in public. Carrying a pistol or revolver openly is permitted without a license; carrying a concealed weapon requires a license from the state or local police.

William Kostric took advantage of that law on Tuesday to show up outside President Obama's Portsmouth, N.H. town hall meeting and hold a sign saying "It Is Time To Water The Tree Of Liberty." That invokes a phrase from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

<more>

teabaggers and republicans are assholes

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. it would work both ways, don't you think?
sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. What horseshit - why bother with democracy ? Just have a bunch of armed warloards running things
just

plain

stupid

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. please define democracy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. A place where ballots - not bullets - rule
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. how simplistic of you and I guess the 2nd amendment has no place in your
reality...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. The Holy 2A like the other amendments has its limitts, guns are not meant to substitute for ballots
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 12:30 PM by jpak
nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #34
82. guns are NOT trying to be a substitute for ballots
only in jpak's world, yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_B_Jackson Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
42. I seem to recall Quanell X and members of the New Black Panthers showing up armed at the Texas GOP
convention (state) in 2000. Other than a single incident with an elderly veteran who took exception and actually instigated physical contact, there weren't any problems.

No hystrionics, no screaming outrage about guns at a political even, no charges of "Intimidation!"

Would be nice if some persons grew up and engaged in rational, logical behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
58. There is no evidence the rifle was loaded....
and Kostric was some distance from the meeting.

Fail-post. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Political intimidation is GOPbagger job 1
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Dodging easy refutations is jpak's job 1.
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #61
70. Reply to post #42
Does that apply here as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_B_Jackson Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #70
75. Yes, it would be nice if our OP
could get past the hystrionics, past the wailing of "doom, doom is upon us!" and he engaged in adult behavior. I see in post #60, that our OP has contacted his representatives. This is a novel change, and to be commended....it's a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
68. So because he was making a statement about
his right to carry a firearm, and you oppose that right, anyone that does exercise that right is an asshole?

How progressive of you.

YUP

YUP

YUP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
67. Agreed 100%
Well said. If Dems could frame their arguements in facts and back them up instead of hand wringing and childish games so much more would be accomplished. Civil discourse, is that what I hear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
23. I think you mean "republic" bill and "republic" law.
Your schtick is slipping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. republics still suck - the schtick sticks
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. The schtick stinks like week-old fish.
It's tired, it's worn, it's ineffectual. The yup's and "because I said so" illogic...you're not helping your cause, and you're not convincing anyone of anything.

Maybe it's time to try a new tactic.

I know! How about you actually DEBATE the facts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Republicans suck
better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. I am honestly worried about this person's grip on reality
I think they are off their meds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Who? John Boehner? Completely off his meds
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 12:15 PM by jpak
http://thinkprogress.org/2011/03/01/boehner-machine-gun-unions/

More republic gun imagery and violent wacko dog whistling

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #35
47. Yes - it is absolutely insane to want to keep concealed weapons out of Maine schools and polls
insanity!

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Washington State had no problems with firearms in polling places.
Why do you think it's a problem for Maine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. The maple syrup makes them jumpy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armueller2001 Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. They get all antsy in their pantsy's
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #49
78. must be something in the water, reckon....
yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. Well, we did end up banning polling places. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #81
84. Good call !
:evilgrin:
I have been voting my mail for so long I forgot that the state finally closed the last polling locations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
71. I was almost going to give her credit
for dropping the schtick.

I guess not,

NOPE

NOPE

NOPE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken_Fish Donating Member (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
77. Haah ha.. I will be sure to carry next time I go to Deweys for Chili while on vacay(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #77
86. I carried last night when wife and I went out for pizza. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
80. Sounds like Maine is on the right path....good on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
83. Good-it is about time that bit of fascism was overturned...We should do away with
licensing and registration requirements and have things revert to the pre 1968 Gun Control Act days. That was a terrible injustice and totally ineffective. The main thing it accomplished was to vastly increase the cost of guns and put much more money in the hands of gun dealers.

Bring back the good old days!

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
89. The permit law does indeed serve no legitimate purpose
Edited on Fri Mar-04-11 07:25 PM by ProgressiveProfessor
If you qualify to own, you qualify to carry

yup yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC