Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmaker takes issue with OKC police chief's remarks about weapons (Oklahoma)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 08:44 AM
Original message
Lawmaker takes issue with OKC police chief's remarks about weapons (Oklahoma)
I sincerely appreciate the service that Oklahoma City Police Chief Bill Citty has given to our community and share his concern for his officers. However, I strongly disagree with his view that certain types of military-style firearms inherently pose a great public threat (“OKC police chief wants tougher gun laws,” news story, Jan. 16).

City Councilmen Sam Bowman and Pete White have supported Citty's stance and share the belief that these types of weapons have no place in civil communities. I consider those comments to be uncivil to the hundreds of thousands of law-abiding Oklahoma gun owners. More importantly, efforts to impose these views on all citizens are a danger to our guaranteed Oklahoma and U.S. constitutional freedoms.

As co-chairman of the Senate Veteran's Affairs Committee and as a member of both Senate public safety committees, I call on Citty to provide the data that shows these types of weapons are used extensively in crime and pose a greater threat statistically than any other commonly held and legally purchased type of firearm.

Read more: http://newsok.com/lawmaker-takes-issue-with-okc-police-chiefs-remarks-about-weapons/article/3534308#ixzz1CQoYXqqu


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let me guess...
...you probably AGREE with this Republican, while holding the head cop in a major metro area - responsible for the safety of hundreds of police officers - in contempt for daring to suggest that maybe our streets would be safer without allowing practically everyone unfettered access to semiautomatic weaponry of all sorts.

You can spare me any sophistry about the definition of 'military-style firearms' or somesuch garb; I don't even want to argue about fucking firearms. In fact, I would be content to let you gun guys run rampant within the confines of this gungeon, but I see this thread listed on the 'Latest Threads' page, suggesting that you posted in in GD or another 'big' forum before a mod saw fit to move it to the gungeon. I've alerted on this post as a blatant endorsement of Republican politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. So you associate anyone who's pro-2A with the right
As if pro-2A Dems don't exist.

You have much to learn grasshopper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. By the way, this has to do with gun policy and was posted directly to the Gun Forum
If you don't want to read it, don't click the link. See how easy that is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. No - I would simply argue that the facts don't warrant stricter controls
Edited on Sat Jan-29-11 10:00 AM by hack89
1. Semi-automatic rifles are rarely used in crimes (one or two percent of all murders)

2. Overall violent crime rates are at historic lows and still declining while gun ownership has skyrocketed.

And lastly, I would point out that historically the police are the last group of people that can be trusted to respect civil rights. They have a quasi-military authoritarian outlook on life - they have an endless capability to rationalize any limit on our civil rights. What do you think the Chief has to say on Miranda or racial profiling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Major city police chiefs are just politicians who wear blue every day
Edited on Sat Jan-29-11 10:25 AM by ProgressiveProfessor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawodevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. So a weapon type that is used very rarely used in violent crime if banned will
Make out streets safer. Or is this more about power hungry political figures and police chiefs who think they are the ultimate authority figures being jealous of the power that private citizens have?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. So banning the LEAST misused guns,
even though those guns are the most popular civilian rifles in the United States and are overwhelmingly used for lawful purposes, is rational and reasonable?

The chief is stuck in a time warp to the early 1990's, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. A demonstration of ignorance, followed by fingers being crammed in ears,
followed by a blatant violation of the the DU civility rules.

For a long time I thought the purpose of the Guns forum was to protect disinterested DUers from a topic that might disturb them - but it becomes clearer every day that the real point is so that those who are able to have intelligent and reasoned (i.e. adult) conversation about an important issue can do so with fewer childish and ill-informed interjections...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Your post is a blatant endorsement of govt. that deny inalienable rights. Is that democratic? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. I see the mods considered your concern valid. *snort*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. LOL this "Republican..
Like Sara Brady, Paul Helmke, Rep. King, Caroline McCarthy, Dick Chaney, Mike Bloomberg, Ronald Regan, etc, etc...

Gun Grabbers all....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Latest threads means latest threads. The forum doesn't matter.
The forum it was posted to is in smaller print just above the title.

Many Democratic politicians endorse the Second Amendment and have an A rating from the NRA. Being pro-RKBA in no way is a Republican only concept.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. You know that, I know that but some people and whatnot n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvccd1000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. So you must agree with...
... Joe Arpaio, "the head cop in a major metro area - responsible for the safety of hundreds of police officers," when he feels that he should stop and arrest all brown people in case they're illegal immigrants. After all, illegals have killed the last 3 Phoenix cops to die in the line of duty, so surely he's only doing it for officer safety, right?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. Given that rifles are collectively the least misused of all weapons in this country...
methinks the chief is either seriously uninformed or is being intentionally misleading. The FBI keeps track of homicides by rifle vs. other methods, and the FBI stats bear repeating:

http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2009/data/table_20.html

Total murders...........................13,636.....100.00%
Handguns.................................6,452......47.32%
Firearms (type unknown)..................1,928......14.14%
Other weapons (non-firearm, non-edged)...1,864......13.67%
Edged weapons............................1,825......13.38%
Hands, feet, etc...........................801.......5.87%
Shotguns...................................418.......3.07%
Rifles.....................................348.......2.55%


The 5-year trend 2005-2009, again per the FBI Uniform Crime Reports:

2005: 442
2006: 436
2007: 450
2008: 375
2009: 348


Anyone stating that civilian rifles are a serious crime problem in this country is fearmongering. Rifles are the least misused of all weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YllwFvr Donating Member (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. i saw a news article
of a chief call out for reimposing the AWB when his officer was killed by a "assault rifle". When it was pointed out the gun used was never on the list (an SKS) he was a bit confused and let it drop, mostly saying "something should be done"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Exactly, though in fairness
An SKS can be modified to accept detachable magazines, (sacrificing reliability) so it could end up banned for import or manufacture, in that configuration, under that law.

But anyone who already owned any one of the hundreds of thousands of them already imported to the US... Legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Not hundreds of thousands. Millions.
I don't know exactly how many SKS's have been imported, but back in the day of $69.99 Chinese SKS's and $99 Russian SKS's, huge numbers were imported. I read that the Georgia Arms Collector's Association or somesuch once put the total number ever imported at seven million, but I can't vouch for that from primary sources. It could probably be estimated by going through the BATFE import stats for all the various importers for the last few decades, but that would be quite a bit of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Wow, that's a lot more than I thought.
I understand they are a pretty good deer gun, on par with the .30-30.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Good article. Someone needs to educate the chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC