Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"White House to Push Gun Control"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 03:41 PM
Original message
"White House to Push Gun Control"
http://www.newsweek.com/2011/01/27/white-house-to-push-gun-control.html

"Obama intentionally did not mention gun control in his State of the Union, but aides say that in the next two weeks the administration will unveil a campaign to get Congress to toughen existing laws"

Start writing those representatives!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. will do - sounds like a great idea! Toughen 'em up. Wonder what
the Pres has in mind . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valhalla Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Only one term....
That is all this will accomplish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Huzzah!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. And now the crazies (not the members here) will go order guns by the 1000s. And stock up on ammo!
Edited on Thu Jan-27-11 03:45 PM by KansasVoter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. they already did
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. When Obama was elected they did. Now it will start again. Wife had a contractor at work....
that said he was buying 1000s of rounds of ammo with every paycheck because Obama was elected. As much as he could afford. Talked about it all the time. The company let him go. Scared some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. and they aren't already?
but you keep saying gun laws don't work, but the threat of gun laws --they do?

you contradict yourself, big time.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lepus Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Only if your law abiding already.
Criminals by definition tend to ignore them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lepus Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I'm a prepper and did something similar.
but I only bought a box per paycheck. It adds up after a year or so. I did get to miss out on the cost run up from the "Dems are going to take our guns" panic.

People were far more nervous about me having a a years worth of food for my family than a few thousand rounds of ammo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. This graph backs up your statement...
Guess what year the Assault Weapons Ban passed.

US FIREARM PRODUCTION, 1989-2008


If you said 1994 you win the big cigar.



The Federal Assault Weapons Ban (AWB) (or Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act) was a subtitle of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, a federal law in the United States that included a prohibition on the manufacture for civilian use of certain semi-automatic firearms, so called "assault weapons." There was no legal definition of "assault weapons" in the U.S. prior to the law's enactment. The 10-year ban was passed by Congress on Sept. 13, 1994, and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton the same day. The ban only applied to weapons manufactured after the date of the ban's enactment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Stocking up on spare magazines would seem to be the most rational response.
If the current (idiotic) purchase bans on standard magazines make it out of committee, I am going to have to buy some. Magazines are consumables for most guns, and there are also a couple of guns that I don't own yet but may pick up magazines for.

I don't see this going anywhere, but never underestimate the stupidity or influence of the corporate media. In 1994, the far less stringent AWB passed by a single vote because at least a dozen Congresspeople thought they were voting to restrict automatic weapons. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Finally..............
The suspense has been unbearable since he was elected.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. I sure will write my rep--encouraging supporting toughening existing laws.
Thanks for the encouragement to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC