Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Man shoots daughter, 12, while cleaning gun

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:11 PM
Original message
Man shoots daughter, 12, while cleaning gun
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 01:12 PM by onehandle
A 12-year-old girl was shot by her father Tuesday evening as he reassembled a handgun he recently purchased and thought was unloaded.

A bullet grazed one of the girl’s wrists and then hit her thigh, Macomb County Sheriff’s Capt. Anthony Wickersham said. The 40-year-old father took his daughter to a local hospital where she was treated and released, Wickersham said.

The incident happened about 8:15 p.m. on Lauren Drive in Macomb Township, Wickersham said. A round was in the gun’s chamber, but the dad apparently didn’t realize the gun had a bullet in it, Wickersham said.

The dad drove his daughter to an area hospital for help and hospital staff contacted the sheriff’s office, Wickersham said results of an investigation will be sent to Macomb County prosecutors for a decision on seeking charges, if any, against the dad, Wickersham said.

http://detnews.com/article/20101006/METRO03/10060397/1014/rss03

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Stupid, careless people are everywhere but...
stupid, careless people with guns are the most dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually no.
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 01:19 PM by TheWraith
Stupid careless people with cars are the most dangerous. Gun accidents kill a few hundred people a year in the US. Car accidents kill tens of thousands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Popcorn time
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. + A very large number..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. So, there's a death and you're settling in for a little fun? Nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Death? What death?
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 03:32 PM by TheCowsCameHome
Maybe you should re-read the original post and not go off half-cocked.

And the "cars vs. guns" is soooooo lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Ironic statement for this thread... "half cocked"
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 05:14 PM by OneTenthofOnePercent
the only reason the daughter died in the OP was carelessness.
the only reason something goes off half-cocked is carelessness.

"Going off half-cocked" originates from the 18th/19th century where a failure of the safe mechanism occurred. On a firearm with only a half-cock safety mechanism, the safe practice is to leave the chamber unloaded or leave once cylinder chamber empty (to rest the hammer over).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. I think you missed their point
No one died. The girl in the OP was treated and released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. And
Injured 2.2million in 2009. 33,000+ killed.

Good news is that as automobile technology and safety improves, the injury and mortality rate is declining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawodevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. But not as fast as gun accident rate is declining

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russ1943 Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. Fatalities of unintentional shootings are less than 5% of all unintentional shootings.

Recent years Unintentional firearm gunshot non fatal injuries according to latest (2008) figures available from WISQARS have been...

.......... RISING, ...........not declining.

Both the rate and the number of victims from 2006 to 2007 and again from 2007 to 2008 increased. Even if non fatal & fatal are combined for the latest figures available 2007, the combined total number of unintentional firearm victims from 2006 to 2007 INCREASED.
Reputable sources such as WISQARS clearly show that fatal shootings represent only about 5% of all unintentional firearm gunshot victims making your oft posted unsourced chart covering fatality rates over a hundred years, both a distortion and largely irrelevant to the subject under discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. link to data please. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russ1943 Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. WISQARS
Sorry, I assumed most readers, certainly most posters would be aware of WISQARS. WISQARS (Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System) is an interactive database system that provides customized reports of injury-related data. http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html
Fatal injury data and Nonfatal injury data each has its own report generating options that allows anyone to select the appropriate data. For example on the Nonfatal Injury report page I entered/selected under options; Unintentional, firearm, the full range of years available 2001 to 2008 then I selected in the last option (Sort by category) Year. Clicked on submit request & the report generated is each years total for the eight years from 2001 thru 2008. Also the population, the crude and age adjusted rates.
Then I went back and deleted the sort by year option, clicked on submit request, and the report generated the total of 133,750. (just to check my math).
Doing the same thing at the very similar fatal report type query provides the numerator necessary to determine percentages.
If this does not satisfy your request, please let me know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
51. Thats cool, you can see that dog bites cause over 20 times more injuries than firearms(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #31
37. Well, if you look at lawodevolution's graph you may note...
Edited on Thu Oct-07-10 05:57 AM by Euromutt
...that the unintentional firearm death rate has periodically shown increases as well; still, the overall trend is downward. While it is true that the most recent data show an increase in non-fatal unintentional shootings, three years' data do not a trend make. We can see in WISQARS that the numbers for 2008 are not as high as those for 2001 or 2003, both in absolute and relative terms.

In that regard, it's interesting to compare a figure I got from an article published in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), "Surveillance for Fatal and Nonfatal Firearm-Related Injuries -- United States, 1993-1998" by Gotsch et al. (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5002a1.htm)



Isn't it interesting how the fatal and non-fatal rates run parallel (granted that the non-fatal rate is an order of magnitude greater)? It's also remarkable how the rates spike every fourth quarter; I'm guessing that would be because of deer season, but I could be wrong.

But what's really germane to this topic are the rates of nonfatal unintentional firearm injuries, and the plotted trend thereof. It comes out a bit lower than the crude rates recorded by WISQARS in the years 2001-2008, indicating an increase between 1998 and 2001. But those latter figures are still way lower than where the trend line is coming from. At the start of 1993, the trend line is close to 8/100,000; from 2001-2008, the highest crude rate was 6.53, and the crude rate for 2008 was 5.66. So it's fair to say that from 1993 to 2008, the rate of unintentional nonfatal firearms injuries has shown an overall decline.

A basic rule of scientific honesty is that you present as much data as you can acquire; when you take a few data points out of a larger series and say "this proves my point," you're cherry-picking, and that's scientifically dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawodevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #31
39. The trends of severity of gun accidents is more important than the overall number unless you can
Break down the types of injuries. From the raw data I have no idea how many of those reported gun accidents involve someone dropping a gun on their foot and breaking a toe, so we will stick with the fatality rate as a good indication of the rate of significant gun accidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russ1943 Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. You are certainly entitled to your opinion.

I do believe you “have no idea how many of those reported accidents involve someone dropping a gun on their foot and breaking a toe………” The definition used by WISQARS to be considered an Unintentional Firearm Gunshot Nonfatal Injury, reads in part; “A penetrating force injury resulting from a powder-charged gun.” FYI the data included is reported by US hospital emergency departments. Their term “firearm” does not include Unintentional BB/Pellet Gunshot Nonfatal Injuries, which if added together (WISQARS 2008) would bring the total unintentional gunshot non fatal injuries to over 30,000 per year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawodevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. So you think accident rate is more important than death rate from accidents
Gun control proponents seem to feel the reported murder rate in the UK is more important than the violent crime rate which is highest in Europe and higher than south Africa

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1196941/The-violent-country-Europe-Britain-worse-South-Africa-U-S.html

So if you think that the gun accident rate is more important than the rate of death from gun accidents it seems you should also concede that the UK (most strict gun laws in Europe) has a rate of violence that is out of control and that gun ban thing seems to be helping them out as much as the gun ban in Juarez Mexico, Nigeria, Jamaica or Russia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Perhaps but what's the ratio of time spent driving to...
time spent handling guns. I probably spend a thousand-fold more time behind the wheel than I do with my Ruger SR9.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawodevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You spend many more hours of the day in the house with your gun
It seems like gun control supporters think a gun is dangerous simply by being in a home, so the hours spent in the house where the gun is will be many times larger than the amount of time spent inside of your car where you also may have a gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
50. But I was comparing apples to apples... time actually spent...
with a weapon in my hand versus a steering wheel in my hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Where does your Ruger SR9 sleep at night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
49. Not in my hand...
otherwise I probably would have shot my wife or myself by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Hmm...
I usually wear my firearm all day. I don't drive all day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butch350 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
38. Then don't clean your gun while your driving then. OK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. regulate better, militia members!
uez thu brainz whut gawd giv yu!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bold Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
36. I'd love too. Unfortunately I cannot get a current issue M-4 do to the
Hughes amendment banning new civilian machine guns. Although, with the Heller decision specifically naming the M-16 as being especially suited to militia duty I am hopeful that we will see a successful challenge to that law.

Oh, you did know that "regulated" in the context of the 2A means armed with like and common arms right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. that context is not hermetically sealed from all other contexts:
http://www.constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

The following are taken from the Oxford English Dictionary, and bracket in time the writing of the 2nd amendment:

1709: "If a liberal Education has formed in us well-regulated Appetites and worthy Inclinations."

1714: "The practice of all well-regulated courts of justice in the world."

1812: "The equation of time ... is the adjustment of the difference of time as shown by a well-regulated clock and a true sun dial."

1848: "A remissness for which I am sure every well-regulated person will blame the Mayor."

1862: "It appeared to her well-regulated mind, like a clandestine proceeding."

1894: "The newspaper, a never wanting adjunct to every well-regulated American embryo city."

The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bold Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Your attempt to confuse the issue with an "info dump" does not do anything to
Edited on Thu Oct-07-10 12:48 PM by Bold Lib
change the context in the 2A. You may not WANT it to mean what it clearly does, but that does not change it. You do seem to like doing research though so I'll point you to the Federalist Papers to research what the 2A is about. Have fun.

edit to add: If you do not wish to start from scratch on the research you can simply look at the footnotes in the recent Heller decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. that is an info dump? i'd hate to see what you consider 'see spot run'.
i'm not trying to confuse jack - you say it means that militia member's guns should work well. fine.

this jackass' gun didn't work well. hence my comment. enjoy stroking your common M-4.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. -1. You lot do love your sexual metaphors for guns, don't you? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:25 PM
Original message
WTF was that guy doing, leaning a loaded gun?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Happens more often than you might imagine...
Easy to leave one in the chamber unless you check and double check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. More reason to practice gun safety
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. How hard is it?
Gun is loaded

Step #1: Remove the magazine
Gun is still loaded

Step #2: Clear the chamber
Gun is still loaded

Step #3: Double Check the chamber and insure it is empty
Gun is still loaded

Step #4: Point in a safe direction
Gun is still loaded

Step #5: Disasemble for cleaning
Gun is still loaded

No matter what, the gun is ALWAYS loaded and should be treated as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I have a stupid question
How on earth can the man disassemble his weapon, clean it and NOT notice a cartridge? Then have it go off as it was being REassembled?

Any ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Magic bullet theory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Yeah, I was wondering about that as well
I can only surmise that he had the slide locked back, inserted a loaded magazine, and then let the slide return to battery not realizing that that would chamber a round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Inserted the magazine during assembly and racked the slide, or he is lying
either way he is a fucking moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeepnstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #28
41. I'm thinking he's lying.
It's all too common for someone to blame the firearm after an unintended discharge. I don't call them accidental. In this case it was more of a negligent discharge.

There's no way on Earth he disassembled the weapon withe a chambered round and then reassembled it without noticing. It just couldn't happen unless he was blind drunk and stupid, in which case he's still a moron.

The rule is simple. Every gun is loaded and ready to destroy whatever you are covering with the muzzle. I've known far more people who were shot with an "unloaded" gun than were the victims of an "accident". And I've never seen a weapon fire on it's own. So if it goes "bang" someone made it happen. You own that bullet so make sure it doesn't go somewhere you'll regret. Every gun is loaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Basic gun safety should be taught in public schools
I can teach someone how to safely unload five or six common types of firearms in about 15 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
44. +1000 (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why was he cleaning a gun around his kids?
Loaded no less!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. This guy screwed up, but when I was learning about arms...
my Dad certainly cleaned the guns around us so that we would learn how to do it safely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. I teach my kids how to responsibly and safely coexist with guns in the home...
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 04:01 PM by benEzra
and that necessarily involves having the kids involved to a degree on those occasions they are cleaned. (Which isn't that often; modern guns don't have to be cleaned every time they are fired.)

I do *not*, however, point guns in unsafe directions and pull the trigger, whether I think the gun is "loaded" or "unloaded". One of the fundamental rules of gun safety is that you treat a gun as if it is always loaded, and that you never, ever point the muzzle recklessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
45. I always cleaned my handguns in the living room after shooting ...
often my daughter was in the room and occasionally friends would stop by.

I've never had an accidental discharge. That doesn't mean that I never will. There are two types of shooters, those who have never had an accidental discharge and those who will.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. Ban daughters. It's the only way we'll be safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
26. Carelessness Kills. Thanks for the reminder.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. Man runs over his own child while backing out of driveway..
stupid takes many forms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawodevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
30. I call BS
If he had put a loaded magazine in the gun after reassembling it and then he chambered a round without knowing it when he closed the slide then technically the gun was no longer in the process of being cleaned when it went off and I would attribute probable gun ignorance due to a lack of our education system teaching gun safety as being the problem. My father taught me that if you put a loaded magazine in the gun and then close the slide that it loads a round and after having been a shooter for many years it has become common sense. I have met people who did not know this at the range and I always take the time to teach them if they are friendly, because as a gun owner and pro-RKBA I have not only a vested interest in lowering violent crime but also gun related accidents, unlike the Brady campaign and VPC who need gun accidents in order to justify their employment and bring in money so they can have an income.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
34. I bet he tried to ease the hammer down on a loaded chamber and slipped
Dumbass. Live ammo shouldn't even be on the table while you're figuring out how your new gun works. Dry fire it or use snap caps. Try all the controls in all possible combinations. It's not rocket science!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawodevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
40. For the rest of her life
She will be reminding her father that he shot her when she wants something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC