Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is surely a parody, but it is funny.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
SmokingLoon Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 01:10 PM
Original message
This is surely a parody, but it is funny.
Edited on Fri Dec-26-03 01:21 PM by SmokingLoon
Obviously, this is a joke, but it does have a grain of truth to it. If faced with home invasion, I hope your options are better than this:

http://www.handguncontrolinc.org/snivel.htm

Hope that everybody had an excellent Christmas.

edit to say...Don't automatically assume that I mean a gun. I mean options...have them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's great!
I especially like the part about not letting anyone else get in your way when you flee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paladin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. This Site Is Every Bit As Funny........
.....as the rest of the far right-wing sites you RKBAers have to resort to, over and over again, for support of your position on guns. Helpful Hint: If you're trying to win Democrats over to your side of the gun argument, using an organization that sells Bill of Rights toilet paper for liberals' bathrooms isn't very prudent.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hey, Paladin, elsewhere in the folder
You'll find some of the RKBA crowd pimping for freepers and trying to cheerlead for a AshKKKroft boondoggle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_acid_one Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You'll also find...
...the anti-rkba crowd pimping for Republican Sara Brady and pretending that the first thing every dealer slides you at a gun show is something besides a Form 4473
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. A million laughs from the RKBA crowd
inlcuding the idea that there's no gun show loophole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_acid_one Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. There's no loophole...
...at gun shows that doesnt apply everywhere else.

The law is the law, and it doesnt suspend itself at gun shows.

Disprove me if you like, but any dealer you try and buy a gun from is going to slide you a Form 4473 first thing.

I got scolded by a dealer one time for having a friend fill out my form 4473 with my information, while I was right there. (my handwriting is horrid, I always have other people assist me with important paperwork)


Not much of a loophole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yeah, surrrrrrrrrre.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_acid_one Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Happy to...
Close the Gun Show Loophole!

http://www.cdfactioncouncil.org/gunshow%20loophole.htm

"Criminals should not be able to walk into a gun show and buy firearms. But they do.
    The federal Brady law requires a background check of gun purchasers, but there is a hole in the law that Congress annually refuses to patch. The law requires federally licensed gun dealers to check the backgrounds of would-be buyers, but the law does not apply the same requirement to unlicensed sellers. This loophole is particularly worrisome at gun shows, where investigations by the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms have reported that criminals are able to buy guns. "

http://www.sltrib.com/2003/Sep/09242003/opinion/95203.asp

"While the 106th Congress has been unable to pass any gun safety legislation, two states have just approved a major priority of the Conference of Mayors: closing the gun show loophole.
The gun show loophole allows non-licensed individuals to sell firearms at gun shows without conducting a background check on a purchaser.
Colorado and Oregon closed this loophole by voter referendum. The action in Colorado came after the state legislature failed to approve a similar measure despite bi-partisan support including that of Republican Governor Bill Owens, and despite the tragedy of the Columbine High School shootings. Weapons used at Columbine were purchased at a gun show.
Denver Mayor Wellington E. Webb helped lead the effort on the Colorado initiative, which passed with almost 70 percent approval. The Conference of Mayors "Wall of Gun Deaths" was prominently displayed in Denver City Hall as part of the effort to close the gun show loophole in the state. "

http://www.usmayors.org/uscm/us_mayor_newspaper/documents/11_20_00/gun_show.htm


"In Hillsborough County, you can't buy a gun without filling out a form, waiting three days and passing a background check. But in Pasco and Polk counties, you can go to a gun show, hand over some cash, and walk out with just about any kind of weapon you want.
Each of Florida's counties can close the gun show loophole. Politicians in Polk and Pasco counties have chosen to leave it open, and the criminals know it. "

http://www.abcactionnews.com/stories/2003/11/031124guns.shtml

"Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)
"We need to get guns off our streets and out of our schools. To do this, we need to start by making sure that every gun bought in the United States is checked and registered. You have to have a registration to drive a car. You should also have to have a registration to own a gun. I am proud to be a cosponsor of Senator Reed's legislation to close the gun show loophole. This bill is an important step in the right direction."

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY)
"Keeping guns out of the hands of criminals is a goal we all share. Closing the gun show loophole will help protect our children and families from the crimes that result when criminals get guns from shows in the thirty-two states that do not require this common sense safety measure.""

http://www.senate.gov/~reed/releases/remarks.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withergyld Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Your own source proves you are wrong :)
From you first cite
"The federal Brady law requires a background check of gun purchasers, but there is a hole in the law that Congress annually refuses to patch. The law requires federally licensed gun dealers to check the backgrounds of would-be buyers, but the law does not apply the same requirement to unlicensed sellers. This loophole is particularly worrisome at gun shows, where investigations by the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms have reported that criminals are able to buy guns."

There is NO gunshow loophole. It is a private sale loophole.

Less the 1% of criminals buy their firearms at gunshows.
40% get them form an illegal (black market) source.
40% get them from a friend or family member.

I can see that by stopping 1% of criminals from buying firearms will make a huge reduction in criminal misuse of firearms.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. What a steaming pantload.
<sarcasm>THAT's why the NRA spends more money than it has keeping this bill and others bottled up in committee... </sarcasm>

Amazing how blatantly dishonest and desperate the RKBA crowd can be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withergyld Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. What specific part of my post was a "Pantload"
In the first part I quoted your own source.

The rest is based on a survey you have seen several times. I will post ANOTHER link to it for you

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/fuo.pdf

I challenged you last time to come up with another source to refute the numbers from this survey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSandman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I've posted the link, too
I think it doesn't always work...LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. What part WASN'T?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withergyld Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. So you admit the cite you gave was a "pantload"????
That is a first!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Spin and spin, with...your post is still a pantload
when all is said and done.

Now go tell some other fetishist "there is no gun show loophole"....then the two of you can laugh your asses off at this "humor site.."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withergyld Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. The gunshow loophole discussed at length
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=118&topic_id=14309

My post is based on one of your cites and a suvery published by the National Institute of Justice. As far as crediblilty goes I'll stick with the NIJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-03 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #24
35. And the thread didn't age into honesty
over two months.

If you want to pretend there's no gun show loophole, I'm not going to waste any more time on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withergyld Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-03 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. I'm not pretending... There is No Gunshow loophole
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSandman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. The second half of Wither's post wasn't
since the DoJ has determined that only 1% of armed criminals obtain guns at gun shows/flea markets.

The first half was because it attempts to imply that the volume of sales by private parties matches the volume by licensed dealers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withergyld Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. you misunderstood the intent of my post
Edited on Fri Dec-26-03 06:58 PM by Withergyld
I quoted Mr.B's cite to show that the laws governing the sale of firearms are the same regardless if the sale is at a gunshow, a gun shop or a parking lot.

The second part was to show that at least 80% of the source criminals use to get firearms would NOT be prevented by closing the "gunshow" loophole.

edited for speeeling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSandman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. I was replying to the question of "What part wasn't?"
I was saying that a previous post was called a pantload by the poster. (1st half)
Trying to make the point of an honest to goodness cited source exposing Gun Show Loophole. Also note the % of military-style weapons used by armed criminals according NIJ/DoJ: AWB is another sham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_acid_one Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. Bravo!
You've proved.....nothing.

You pointed to a bunch of quotes by a bunch of people who obviously dont even know what they're talking about. One of them even went as far as admitting that the so called "gun show loophole" is dishonestly named at best.

For one thing, it's not even a real "loophole", as the law was designed to apply to dealers, not to individuals selling private property.

Secondly, it hardly applys only at "gun shows"...the same laws apply everywhere. It doesnt matter whether the transaction takes place at a gun show, or in my backyard, it's the same type of sale.

Basically you've proved your sources are either dishonest, uninformed, or both. Way to go Bench!

Next you're going to tell me how the Colt SAA can be easily converted to full auto, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-03 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #31
37. Hahahahahahahahaha!
Edited on Sat Dec-27-03 08:45 AM by MrBenchley
<sarcasm>Yeah, everybody is lying except for a handful of gun fetishists, some of the scummiest Republicans around, and the crooked gun industry....</sarcasm>

Boy-o-boy, what a barrel of monkeys THIS right wing asswipe's website turned out to be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSandman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. Offering opinions is no proof
"We need to get guns off our streets and out of our schools. To do this, we need to start by making sure that every gun bought in the United States is checked and registered. You have to have a registration to drive a car.

I have two daughters who can drive a car w/o registration in their name. I can drive all over my property without registration. False, false, false.

Does the Senator mean to imply that if I agree to her registration, I can carry my gun in every state...just like driving the car?




"In Hillsborough County, you can't buy a gun without filling out a form, waiting three days and passing a background check. But in Pasco and Polk counties, you can go to a gun show, hand over some cash, and walk out with just about any kind of weapon you want.

So what? This make Hillsborough County safer how? Oh, I forgot, criminals just cross the county line. At least the 1% who get their guns at a gun show.

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/fuo.pdf


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1a2b3c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. And there you have it
The proof weve been looking for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_acid_one Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Dont you know?
The only "proof" anti's really need for their assertions are that they wish it was true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSandman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. The DoJ agrees there is no Gun Show Loophole
DoJ study has found that 2% of armed criminals used a military-style semiautomatic rifle or machine gun and fewer than 2% obtained their guns at a gun show or flea market.

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/fuo.pdf


My belief is anyone hollering "gun show loophole" is misinformed or wanting to regulate ALL private firearms transactions...as if criminals obey another law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1a2b3c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. A million laughs from the crowd that knows everything
A gun show loophole. Catchy phrase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valarauko Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-03 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
38. Freedom is not a loophole (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_acid_one Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Who would have guessed...
...that gun owners are starting to get annoyed that a certain political party is continually alienating them.

Some notable characters with a D by their name are continually screaming for banning this and banning that and gun owners arent supposed to notice?

Of course they're fucking pissed, the democratic party sells them down the river time and time again on the gun issue and then we're shocked they dont support democrats?

I know several union types who dont vote democratic because of the gun issue, even though they're otherwise democrats.

The shrill anti-gun screams of a few have turned the heads of many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Too frigging funny....
"I know several union types who dont vote democratic because of the gun issue, even though they're otherwise democrats."
Ever notice how many of these RKBA types claiming to know "union gun owners" also claim to be in right to work states? Wonder which union we're talking about?
Any of those that make up the AFL-CIO? They're on the NRA hate list.
The American Federation of Teachers? They're on the NRA hate list.
The International Ladies` Garment Workers` Union? They're on the NRA hate list.

But, hey, it's not a gun control group selling the "hilarious" Bill of Rights toilet paper, now, is it? It's another bunch of rancid right wing loonies that th RKBA crowd is happily snuggling up to. You guys have just the nicest playmates....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_acid_one Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Rrrright.....
Uhm, the welders union in this case, laughs...a friend of mine, his father, and his brother (and they know others like them, but i've never met them so i cant say). They're all professional welders, they're all union members, they all own firearms, they're deffinitly not republican, and they all dont vote democratic because this party has stabbed them in the back on that issue.

Cant say I blame them. Why should gun owners support the democratic party when the democratic party doesnt support gun owners? It's really simple... a lot of gun owners are one issue voters, or at the very least put a lot of weight on this issue. The shrieking of the anti's has ensured that at least 70% of gun owners (an estimated 80 million) wont touch the democratic party with a 10 foot pole.

The HCI site may be "selling" (they're not really) Bill of Rights toilet paper. But it's the anti-gunners who are indeed using the Bill Of Rights as toilet paper, and portraying the entire democratic party as being gun hating extremists in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Yeah, surrrrrrrrre.....
"Why should gun owners support the democratic party when the democratic party doesnt support gun owners? "
Koresh knows that nothing is as important to fetishists as their fetish object...not the economy, not the welfare of others, not national security, not the envirronment.....nothing but their popguns.

"The shrieking of the anti's has ensured that at least 70% of gun owners (an estimated 80 million) wont touch the democratic party with a 10 foot pole."
Not even close to true...as that DLC memo the RKBA crowd was waving around showed.
--90% of Americans want to close the gun show loophole
--86% want increased penalties for gun trafficking, just like Charles Schumer proposes
--79% want background checks for ALL firearm transactions
--77% want an assault weapons ban....
--67% want ALL firearms registered

"The HCI site may be "selling" (they're not really) Bill of Rights toilet paper."
The artwork says it all...anybody who would lie about what the Second Amendment means, as the RKBA crowd does routinely, shows what they really think of the Bill of Rights...

http://www.handguncontrolinc.org/hci_catalog.htm



As former Chief Justice Warren Burger said, " has been the subject of one of the greatest pieces of fraud, repeat the word 'fraud,' on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime." And what a special interest group, too...racist, corrupt and extremist to the point of lunacy.

By the way, some more "humorous" stuff from this right wing cesspool....


Does the RKBA crowd EVER read anything sane people read?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1a2b3c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. well i am union
or was before i moved. In 2000 i voted for nader. I could bring myself to vote gore. It wasnt just his registry system but that sure didnt hurt in making my decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSandman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-03 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
45. UMWA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. More from this "humorous" site....

"I just got sent your site from a friend, it is great! enough said, oh yeh.. Sara Brady and Janet Reno were caught screwing each other today, (no suprise) but the dildos were shaped like toy guns!!!!!!! ha ha ha ha WW"

"Sarah B. is a b-i-tch.  Keep up the great site.  I'm gonna fwd a link to many many people.   BTW, I am writing a parody for gun control, I'll Email you a copy when it's done. M"

"Josh, (or whoever this may concern)        
It's great to see this type of approach to the Liberal, Gun Control Jerk-offs.   Fellow gun owners and gun rights advocates are going to have to do like you did and take their threats, claims and beliefs for what they are....Bull Sh*t..... something that deserves nothing more than a laugh. When gun owners start crying and moaning about gun control organizations, they are lowering themselves to "Liberal Level".  I always vote and I make sure that the candidates who I'm voting for will protect my interests as a hunter/gun owner. (A good way to do this is to check the list of candidates who the NRA supports)  Also, if someone's interested in protecting their 2nd amendment rights, keeping an updated membership to the NRA (along with any contributions that he or she can afford) is crucial.           Keep up the good work on the site.  Very entertaining. (plus, seeing anything that gets the Liberals in an uproar is always bonus :-) )           Sincerely,          
C.L."

http://www.handguncontrolinc.org/fan_mail_3.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
souphound Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. MrBenchley How many gun shows have you been to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-03 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. Enough to last me a lifetime
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-03 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. Don't know why
I just can't imagine you at a gun show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
souphound Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-03 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. Another non answer from MrBenchley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-03 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Tough titty...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-03 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Another deep thought brought to you by the
anti's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-03 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-03 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
34. Gun Ban Supporters
Here's where I get painfully blunt. Guess what? If the "assault weapon" ban stays in its current form, we still get to purchase Kalashnikov clones and semi-automatic AR-15 rifles. Here's the kicker; when it sunsets in September, we'll get to purchase Kalashnikov clones again with folding stocks, bayonets, and those evil "banana clips" you love to whine about. It's a win/win situation because the AWB and gun control as a whole is a dead political issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC