Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unbelievably huge ruling on MMJ from 9th Circuit Appeals

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Virgil Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:14 PM
Original message
Unbelievably huge ruling on MMJ from 9th Circuit Appeals
I cannot express how big this ruling is- http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/17/thread17974.shtml

The Constitution outlined the granted powers of the federal government. It was implicit that those powers not granted by the Constitution would necessarily remain with the States. But just to make sure, the Bill of Rights included the 10th amendment to make it explicit. The federal government used the Commerce Clause of the Constitution to enforce a total prohibition of cannabis. This ruling says that the states can have Medical Marijuana and the federal government can no longer enforce the prohibition of cannabis for medical purposes.

This has huge implications and I suggest you read the comments at Cannabisnews to gain perspective on the importance of this ruling. Please advance this news to every messageboard possible. It will bring tidings of great cheer to many. Reason and justice have prevailed. It is absolutely a huge decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. You have to love the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals! :-)
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwynsw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not holding my breath on this one
Didn't check the link. I accepting your statement as correct. (i'm sure it is.)

Given the 9th Circuit's record in theh Supreme Court, I will not be surprised if this is overturned. Sad, but likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. You shouldn't be holding your breath...
...you should be inhaling deeply. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwynsw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. May I hold my breath after I inhale deeply?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. That will be...
...fine :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. At first glance it seems to parallel the recent ruling on machine guns
That the federal government's use of the interstate commerce clause of the Constitution to regulate activity that is neither commerce nor interstate is unconsitutional. A person who builds a homemade machine gun from scratch and neither sells it nor transfers it across state lines cannot be prosecuted by the federal government if the person lives in the 9th District.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathappened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. this should be the law of the land
i have seen first hand what maryjane can do to help people with cancer , i had a cousin and a nefpew with liver cancer , only 6 months to live for both of them , cousin didnt smoke maryjane and sisters son did , he is alive and still fighting this cancer and cousin is 6 foot under , cause he couldnt eat , so i'm a firm beleiver in medical maryjane and for that matter any one who wants to smoke it , we freed the iraq people , why don't we take time to free our people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funkyflathead Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. I bet the Canadians are mad
No pot runs to the north!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Word on the streets here says BC is a major producer
Of high-quality indoor-grown sinsemilla. It makes it all the way to SoCal and competes with locally grown stuff. They have a good supply of cheap hydroelectric power to run the lights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1a2b3c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Its the best ive ever smoked
And ive smoke cali kind buds. The shit coming out of BC is the shit. I want cut a couple clones or get some good seeds from the northerners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stilgar Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. I had lost track of this
I think this is from the Justice Department saying that homegrown pot that was used for yourself or a sick person in your care was DEA territory. The DEA has interstate authority.

I find it hard to believe that SCOTUS can override what is clearly non-interstate. It can be argued that large farms are for interstate and seized, but the MMJ grown by the sick person and smoked/injested only by the sick person is in no way interstate.

Although the way SCOTUS has been going they will probably rule the seeds the plants came from are interstate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC