|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
tucsonlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 04:43 PM Original message |
Concealed Handgun Permit Holders Kill 7 Police, 44 Private Citizens Over Two-Year Period |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. That's a very low rate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tucsonlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Tell That To The Families Of The Deceased. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 05:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Appeal to emotion - Concealed carry is used to stop far more crimes than it causes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 05:25 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Have a link for how many killings/crimes they have stopped? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:04 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. Here is one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:22 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. lord jeezus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:34 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. There is NOTHING to be shameful for. The shame is on those that want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tucsonlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. But Then..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. and another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:31 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. once again (ed) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:33 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. LOL. Funny post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 05:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
22. Yep, and if you take out the suicide canard it's even lower. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 08:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
64. I wonder how low the number would get if you take out acquittals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 12:17 PM Response to Reply #64 |
97. Point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nosmokes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 10:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
87. Not compared to folks that don't carry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 05:20 AM Response to Reply #87 |
90. How about compared to people who do carry but illegally? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. And they wasted the meat too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
4. Low numbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nosmokes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 05:46 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. When the 2nd amendment was written and adopted muzzle loaders were state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 05:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. They also had cannon.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hay rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
49. And we have nukes now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imdjh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 04:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
110. I hate cannon as the plural. It's so PBS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deadric Damodred (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:15 PM Response to Reply #17 |
29. Well as far as the Supreme Court is concerned... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 07:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
53. And no computers, and no photography, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 07:27 PM Response to Reply #17 |
55. meaningless non-argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nosmokes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 10:30 PM Response to Reply #55 |
86. I'm a fascist? that's rich! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
5. Freedom isn't free. I didn't kill any of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. Why should anybody have to have one of these stupid permits anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. The Constitution does not give you the right to carry a concealed weapon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 05:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. I think you're reading into Heller more than is there.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 05:48 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. To read something in to Heller, it helps to actually *read* Heller |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 05:54 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. How you get 'prohibitions on concealed carry' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:27 PM Response to Reply #20 |
32. "For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:46 PM Response to Reply #32 |
45. context context context... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:51 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. I've asked you twice now to explain exactly how you're reading that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 07:01 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. No, I comprehend just fine.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 07:12 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Once again, you can provide no alternative interpretation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 07:31 PM Response to Reply #52 |
58. I'm being stubborn?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:42 PM Response to Reply #58 |
76. I'm sincerely interested in how you could possibly read that text any other way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:29 PM Response to Reply #20 |
33. dup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imdjh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 04:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
109. You're right- it gives me the right to keep and bear arms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertFlower (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
7. i didn't read the responses to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 11:28 AM Response to Reply #7 |
94. I see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertFlower (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 01:05 PM Response to Reply #94 |
104. i'm sure you have all the answers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #104 |
107. actually, I had a question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
8. Q to people in this forum - in 2 years, how many CRIMINALS are dealt with by permit holders? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Probably far fewer than 51. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:05 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. Most definitely much much more. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:30 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. Yes, that famous peer-reviewed scientific journal, "American Gun Review" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:36 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. LOL. Like that "stick your fingers in your ears and say LaLaLa" argument don't ya. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:44 PM Response to Reply #34 |
44. twice in one thread?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 07:29 PM Response to Reply #34 |
56. Yet you are defending the garbage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:34 PM Response to Reply #56 |
73. The study is published by the NIH, via Harvard School of Public Health |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:48 PM Response to Reply #73 |
79. Why keep asking stupid questions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:49 PM Response to Reply #73 |
80. It really helps if you read the OP and go to the links before posting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 08:48 PM Response to Reply #34 |
66. You say that while defending a study by the VPC, that's hysterical. Best joke yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:28 PM Response to Reply #66 |
71. You do understand the meaning of "peer reviewed", don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:33 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. Who's trying to refute it? It proves how safe CCW permit holders are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:36 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. So you're laughing at me for "defending" it, but you don't want to refute it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:41 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. I have no problem with this information but the VPC routinely falsifies findings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:43 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. OK, explain this to me: where are you getting VPC from this study? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:47 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. Here you go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:51 PM Response to Reply #78 |
82. Ah, you're talking about the OP's study, not the one I posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:52 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. It's always about the OP, otherwise rules say start a new thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:55 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:50 PM Response to Reply #77 |
81. Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 10:13 PM Response to Reply #77 |
85. Deleted sub-thread |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-24-09 08:24 AM Response to Reply #71 |
117. I do know, I'm not sure you do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-24-09 08:29 AM Response to Reply #71 |
118. Oh, by the way, the NIH didn't publish this study |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Really?! LOL, Check this out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
39. Wow, some random internet crank is MUCH more impressive than the Harvard School of Public Health, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:37 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. LOL, You so funny. Guess you have to fall back on that when your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:54 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. You gonna cite WorldNetDaily next? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 11:20 AM Response to Reply #47 |
92. HaHaHa. This from the person that blindly follows VPC "studies" LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 11:23 AM Response to Reply #92 |
93. keep covering your eyes and going wahwah there, Phil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 12:21 PM Response to Reply #93 |
98. You are so funny. I'll stick with credible sources. The ones that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-24-09 09:07 AM Response to Reply #39 |
119. You missed the bit about that paper being published in the Tennessee Law Review, didn't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TPaine7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
9. Another link... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
10. I love threads about guns, it gives me a great opportunity to expand my ignore list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 07:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
59. Me next, me next!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 07:54 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. Goodbye and good riddance. When it comes to guns there's nothing to discuss. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:26 PM Response to Reply #62 |
70. Oh please me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 12:31 AM Response to Reply #62 |
88. ahh yes, a true demonstration of the "open-minded" and "rational" attitude progressives... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #88 |
105. HAHAHAHAHA HAH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 05:27 AM Response to Reply #62 |
91. Though I am sure you won't be reading this *wink* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 01:38 PM Response to Reply #59 |
106. I'm sure if you ask nicely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-24-09 09:09 AM Response to Reply #10 |
120. Or you could just stay out of this forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneshooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
13. Did you notice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
21. I see a few problems with this "study" right off the bat. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tucsonlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:05 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Well, Not Just Any "Suicides". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:11 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. No, it skews the results. And I think that is done intentionally considering the source. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tucsonlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:37 PM Response to Reply #28 |
41. No, I'm Saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:42 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Here is the relevant text that you seem to have missed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tucsonlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 07:19 PM Response to Reply #43 |
54. Fine, You Win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 11:45 AM Response to Reply #54 |
95. On it's face it does indeed. While I have (thankfully) never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. Well if you're charged with something and you're not guilty... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tucsonlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:54 PM Response to Reply #36 |
48. Okay! Okay! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 12:49 AM Response to Reply #48 |
89. Ummmm, what??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 11:49 AM Response to Reply #48 |
96. Please see post 95 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 12:33 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. ooooooo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 12:42 PM Response to Reply #99 |
101. That was an A, B conversation. please DO try to keep up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 12:47 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. I read your post 96 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 12:39 PM Response to Reply #96 |
100. one should do the trick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 01:01 PM Response to Reply #100 |
103. is that crickets I hear??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 02:46 PM Response to Reply #100 |
108. and silence must be taken as admission |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hay rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
50. Some numbers- a comparison. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tucsonlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 07:30 PM Response to Original message |
57. i'm sorta confused |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 07:37 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. The other spent most of today in LBN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 07:56 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. ... where slightly more rational, decent people saw it ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 08:50 PM Response to Reply #63 |
68. more like where irrational, uninformed, emotionally weak people saw it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 09:23 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. +1 man. +1 (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 08:49 PM Response to Reply #57 |
67. My guess is both. See a dentist and take a shower and repost it. Then see what happens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
61. 51 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-20-09 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
65. Thanks for pointing out how safe CCW permit holders are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tucsonlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #65 |
111. Just Keeping People Informed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #111 |
112. You mean just as you did? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tucsonlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-21-09 06:43 PM Response to Reply #112 |
113. Was I Talking To You? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-23-09 08:42 PM Response to Reply #111 |
114. Thanks for posting this study that proves how safe CCW permit holders are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tucsonlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-23-09 09:00 PM Response to Reply #114 |
115. Sure! Happy To Oblige. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-23-09 09:26 PM Response to Reply #115 |
116. Those people are clearly delusional. This study proves CCW permit holders are safer than cops. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC