Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fenty ready to throw D.C. gun control under the bus.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Pullo Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 02:13 PM
Original message
Fenty ready to throw D.C. gun control under the bus.....
.....in exchange for D.C. voting rights

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dc/2009/03/fenty_dc_residents_support_vot.html

I would love to see this bill reach Obama's desk ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. This guy doesn't inspire my confidence..
But hey, if it gets DC abiding by the SCOTUS' decision in Heller, works for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. The anti-gun groups are terrified of citizens in Washington D.C.
having the right to own firearms for self protection.

With good reason. Crime might actually drop.

The Supreme Court's decision last summer to strike down the District's unconstitutional ban on handguns affirmed what many of us already knew -- that the Framers guaranteed all Americans an individual right to bear arms. After that decision, the D.C. government repeatedly demonstrated that it intended to do as much as possible to defy the ruling. For example, the District first claimed that city residents could exercise their constitutional right to self-defense, but only as long as their firearms were kept unloaded and disabled until the moment they confronted an attacker. Subsequent city actions have not been much better.

The District imposed a number of restrictions, including burdensome registration processes and reporting requirements. It required parental consent for legal adults old enough to enlist in the military and carry weapons. The city also banned many firearms, including some handguns, which the justices noted are effective for self-defense. All of this serves only to frustrate and discourage D.C. residents from exercising their legal rights to bear arms.

If strict gun control worked, then the District -- which had long been home to the nation's most restrictive gun control measures -- would be the safest place in the country. But gun violence in the city was consistently among the highest in the nation throughout the 30 years that the city banned handguns. The reason is obvious: A gun control law will not dissuade violent criminals from killing or robbing with guns. Criminals use illegal guns purchased on the black market. Washington's police officers are on the front lines of the battle against violent crime, and they know, as the Fraternal Order of Police recently stated, that the handgun ban was "a miserable failure by any estimation." They also know that many city officials are devoted to the gun ban because it provides political cover for the District's dismal crime numbers.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/12/AR2009031202998.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

welcome to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Questionable at best
Fenty, mental giant that he has proven to be, was being interviewed and said that "we can always rescind and change the new gun laws once we get the House seat".

Even if he thinks he can pull that off with no repercussions, it's a really dumb thing to say for the record and shows that he just doesn't get it. It seems like he's guilty of believing his own press releases about how wonderful he is.

I'm sure he and his cronies still think Heller was a "suggestion" and not a law they must abide by. He will keep running up big lawyers bills ($3.6 million they owe Gura and Possessky so far) but hey, it's tax money so who cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angleae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. They won't get to keep their house seat even if it passes.
Tbe Constitution reserves such for states, not districts or territories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackson1999 Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Welcome to my world
I live in DC and therefore, am living this issue. Fenty is just acknowledging reality. The DC Council really painted themselves into a corner with their non-compliance with Heller. It may be too little too late, however. Yes, I want the vote. Yes, I want real 2A rights, and No, I don't want to lose the right of DC to govern itself on gun laws. BUT, the City Council's actions are making this impossible. I'll take the vote and the Congressional mandated relaxing of gun laws if that's all we can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Furyataurus Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. What I don't understand is
why can't D.C. residents by guns in Maryland? They are NOT crossing STATE lines by buying guns in Maryland, are they????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. DC is not in Maryland.
For that matter, DC is not in any state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC