|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 10:58 AM Original message |
It took a gun to stop these guys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
1. Deadly force to protect property? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 11:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Not according to the law and if you bother to read the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. its illegal to use deadly force to protect property in every state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 11:44 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I take it you're not up on EVERY states laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. then do tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
24. During the hours of darkness in Texas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
25. Now there have been some changes to TX law with the new Castle Doctrine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. "he took action" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. His actions were legal and withing Texas law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. quote the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 04:51 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Nope, the guy was never charged that's good enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-28-08 12:01 PM Response to Reply #32 |
73. interesting priority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. deleted as duplicate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Not only do I not Condemn his actions I commend him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:06 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. friend, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. Deleted message |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:25 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. Here is what you said generalizing about not condemning that upstanding citizen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:26 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Now lets see if you have the courage to call me that directly. I'm calling you out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. oh dear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:38 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Do you normally forget what you read within two minutes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:30 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. yes; and your point is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:38 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. That you wont back up your previous statement. Thank you, didn't think you would. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:59 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. back up my previous statement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 06:05 PM Original message |
Well that's what I thought. You'd stop just short of calling me those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 06:05 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Well that's what I thought. You'd stop just short of calling me those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 06:20 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. apparently, if it's worth saying once |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Well, since you can't seem to respond to it apparently it needs to be said again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. oh my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 06:54 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. I'll respond in the same manner you like to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 07:22 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. oh dear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Laughing, Oh you make this too easy! Ha Ha Ha! No it means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 06:56 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. HaHaHaHa You funny! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:29 PM Response to Reply #30 |
67. Isn't he innocent until PROVEN guilty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:46 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. what seems to be your problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-28-08 05:33 AM Response to Reply #68 |
70. your mincing words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbo Teg (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-28-08 08:38 AM Response to Reply #30 |
72. Hmm, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Not quite true, but protecting property is not really the issue here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. oh your right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Texas PC 9.43 has been in place for at least 35 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 12:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. in Florida ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Nice piece of pettifoggery and argumentum ad hominem there, iver |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 01:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. actually, I say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. I have never said that California had the same law as Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 03:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. it's hard to tell at this point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EricTeri (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 12:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Not even close my friend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. incidentally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Taken from the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. truly pathetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. And it is commendable that the alert homeowner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Deadly force to protect life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbo Teg (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-28-08 08:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
71. Yup, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
12. the sin of omission? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Deleted message |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
14. interesting ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. You said you read the article. Apparently not as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaryCeleste (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 10:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
69. Ahhh, more blame the victim from you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EricTeri (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
17. I just want to know why ANYONE .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 01:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. I want to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spoonman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. We ALL want to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. what a lot of funny stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spoonman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. What the hell does that mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. if you can figure out how to "infer" something "on" someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 04:54 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Forget it, you'd be better off talking to a wall. It's less frustrating too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. now, now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:21 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. My point made. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 04:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
31. Again, more non answerers and further obfuscation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:06 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:20 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 05:39 PM Response to Reply #44 |
53. Deleted message |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 06:01 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. it needs to be preserved for posterity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 06:06 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Deleted message |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 08:39 PM Response to Reply #31 |
65. I contributed a please! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L1A1Rocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 08:51 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. No, not really, and we all quickly devolved from there. Oh well, Se La Vi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 02:27 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC