NICARAGUA: Sandinistas taking control

[Robbien]

Since last year, Nicaraguan parliamentary politics has been dominated by threats of a constitutional crisis. While the National Assembly debates corruption, and US-defined “good governance”, however, outside parliament people are more concerned with the teachers’ strike entering its third week, the looming water crisis and the rapidly degenerating health system.

The three main forces in the National Assembly are: President Enrique Bolanos’s centre-right Alliance For The Republic (APRE); the far-right Constitutional Liberal Party (PLC); and the social-democratic Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN), which is led by 1980s revolutionary Daniel Ortega. APRE is in a minority in the assembly, while the FSLN has the largest single number of representatives. Bolanos was elected by popular vote.

The November municipal elections revealed a shift in the balance of forces. The PLC, whose leader, former President Arnoldo Aleman, was convicted of corruption and jailed last year, polled very poorly. APRE came a distant third, dashing Bolanos’ hope of building a significant alternative to the FSLN or PLC. The FSLN, however, was the clear winner, sweeping to power in 88 of the 152 municipalities and winning governance of the main towns in 15 of the 17 states. Voter turnout was just 54%.

In January, the National Assembly re-elected its office-bearers. Last year, US Ambassador Barbara Moore held discussions with all the parties to make sure that the FSLN was shut out of leadership positions. This year, however, the Sandinista candidate Rene Nunez Tellez, was elected to the post by a huge majority of votes, with the other six positions on the National Assembly Directorate evenly split between traditional enemies the FSLN and the PLC. Of the 21 parliamentary committees, 10 went to the FSLN and 10 to the PLC, with just one going to APRE.

The assembly is also discussing how to reduce the power of the executive. One bill introduced would move the authority to appoint and remove the heads of publicly owned utilities from the president to the National Assembly. This was provoked by Bolanos’ intention to accede to an International Monetary Fund demand to privatise the country’s water supply. The second bill will amend the constitution to remove the presidential veto over legislation and will make the appointment of ministers the responsibility of the assembly, rather than the president. Other reforms sought to make possible the impeachment and removal of a president from office.

more
http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/2005/616/616p19b.htm

[imenja]

1. The Cold War lives on in Latin America

Bush looks into Putin's eyes and sees his soul; China is granted most-favored nation status; but the Sandinistas are still the mortal enemy of the United States. The US seeks to exclude the FSLN from power it wins through the ballot box, yet the Bush administration claims it promotes democracy. If the Sandinistas are so threatening, how will this administration react to likely electoral outcomes in Lebanon and Iraq?

[Wright Patman]

2. In Iraq

the U.S. made it impossible for the factions to form a coalition even to write a new constitution, much less govern, if our guy (Allawi or someone of like mind) wasn't allowed to remain in charge and make nice with the U.S. military over the 14 permanent bases.

'Divide and conquer' is the name of the game. And those 150,000 troops will NEVER be coming home.

You don't hear much about that Iraqi election anymore. In fact, you don't hear much about Iraq--period.

[imenja]

3. Where are you listening?

My television news source is PBS' The NewsHour. They cover Iraq nearly every night. It's also covered in the print media. Cable TV has been obsessed with Michael Jackson and the Atlanta murders, but that doesn't mean one never hears of Iraq anymore.

I certainly agree that Bush's motives are far from noble in either Iraq or Nicaragua.