Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich on Missile Defense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 12:39 PM
Original message
Kucinich on Missile Defense
http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/oh10_kucinich/050302nmd1min.html

For Immediate Release
Monday, March 07, 2005
Kucinich On House Floor: NMD Is A Failure

Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich (D-OH) gave the following speech today on the House floor on Canada’s decision to opt out of the National Missile Defense (NMD) being advocated by the Administration:

“Canada has officially opted out of the laughably named National Missile Defense System. We should take a lesson from our neighbors. They knew the NMD has a terrible record; 10 highly artificial and carefully scripted flight intercept tests, only five resulting in hits. One hit occurred when the equivalent of an electronic ``hit me'' sign was put on a supposed attack missile.

“The new booster rocket for the kill vehicle has a one-in-three success rate. That is a one-in-three chance of even getting off the ground. The Pentagon canceled nine of the original 20 tests to focus on building the system instead of testing it.

“Today, the NMD benefits no one except a few contractors and their patrons. Meanwhile, the Canadians chose not to buy a lemon. Here we plant a lemon grove and then franchise lemonade stands.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pie Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. very good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Being strong on defense is not spending money at the
Pentagon. Strong borders is strong on defense. Save ports is strong on defense. Trained and equipped first responders is strong on defense. Two more battalions of boots on the ground is strong on defense.

The Republicans ARE NOT STRONG ON DEFENSE>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC