Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BUSH "LIVING IN THE PAST" ON MISSILE DEFENSE- - Misleader.org

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 04:20 PM
Original message
BUSH "LIVING IN THE PAST" ON MISSILE DEFENSE- - Misleader.org
www.Misleader.org

BUSH "LIVING IN THE PAST" ON MISSILE DEFENSE

President Bush this week said that "those who oppose ballistic missile
system really don't understand the threats of the 21st century. They're
living in the past." He then claimed, "We're going to do what's necessary to
protect this country."<1> But a look at the President's push for an unproven
defense system aimed at preventing a Cold War-style attack while he
underfunds counterterrorism/homeland security shows that he is the one whose
policies are wholly outdated. It also shows that, in fact, he is not doing
everything necessary to protect America.

The missile defense system the President is pushing is designed to shoot
down Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) - a weapon experts agree
posed a far greater threat to America during the Cold War. By contrast,
today the threat of 9/11-style terrorism is far greater than that of an
ICBM. A missile defense system does nothing to address that kind of
terrorism. Additionally, nonpartisan congressional auditors this year found
that the missile defense system was wholly unproven.<2>

Despite these facts, the President is pushing to spend billions on the
system, while cutting funding for more pressing national security programs.
Specifically, he is pushing a massive 9% cut to the Nunn-Lugar program<3> -
the government's central effort to protect loose nuclear material and
prevent that material from getting into the hands of terrorists on the
international black market. He has also drastically underfunded basic
homeland security programs, including grants to first responders.<4>

To illustrate just how out of touch the President has been on national
security issues, consider the summer before 9/11: As the White House
received warnings of an imminent terrorist (not ICBM) attack, the Bush
administration threatened to veto an urgent request to shift $800 million
from missile defense into critical counter-terrorism programs.<5>

Sources:

1. "President's Remarks in Ridley Park, Pennsylvania ," The White House,
8/17/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=51069.
2. "Missile defense called unproven," San Francisco Chronicle, 4/24/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=51070.
3. "Fact Sheet: GOP Budget and Homeland Security," HouseDemocrats.gov,
03/25/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=51071.
4. "The Bush Record: Homeland Insecurity," Democrats.org,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=51072.
5. "What Went Wrong.," Newsweek, 05/27/02, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1338421&l=51073.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC