Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gwynne Dyer: Showdown in Najaf: US Logic Hard to Follow

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 08:17 PM
Original message
Gwynne Dyer: Showdown in Najaf: US Logic Hard to Follow
Showdown in Najaf: US Logic Hard to Follow

The claims and counter-claims make it hard to discern the strategies behind the showdown in Najaf, and the language that is used blurs the situation even more. U.S. military spokesmen, for example, always call the young men who are defending rebel Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr "anti-Iraqi forces," although not one in a hundred of them has ever been outside Iraq.

But you can guess why U.S. authorities in Iraq chose this moment to try to eliminate Sadr and his al-Mahdi militia.

From the start, the biggest obstacle to the creation of a compliant, pro-American regime in Iraq has been the fact that the Shias, who make up about 60 per cent of Iraq's population, could elect a majority government that could, and probably would, defy U.S. wishes if they voted as a bloc. Moreover, senior Shia clerics command great respect in the community, making it much likelier that the Shia would indeed vote en bloc. So, elections were too risky.

Retired general Jay Garner, the original choice as U.S. pro-consul in Iraq, was dismissed after a month because he called for early elections in Iraq: "The night after I got to Baghdad, (Defense Secretary Donald) Rumsfeld called me and told me he was appointing Paul Bremer as the presidential envoy. The announcement ... was somewhat abrupt."

Rumsfeld was worried that an elected Iraqi government would resist mass privatization of the economy, but he was equally worried that such a government would be Shia-dominated, and insist on an Islamic state.

The problem was compounded by the fact that Washington's favorite ayatollah, Abdul Majid al-Khoei, was killed the day after Baghdad fell. Khoei had become a personal friend of British Prime Minister Tony Blair during his long exile in London, and had strong U.S. backing. But a mob hacked him to death in the Imam Ali mosque in Najaf on April 10, 2003, the day after he arrived, leaving the field open to less pro-American rivals.

more@link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. the chimp wants to show how tough he is
too bad he seems incapable of any kind of serious analysis.

it hard on the shias, but the continuing debacle will help get rid of the resident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Boy, is that Orwellian or what?
Iraqis in Iraq fighting US occupation forces are anti-Iraqi.

Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, and US forces fighting Iraqis are "pro-Iraqi".
It is too bad he died young. I am sure he would have had
a lot more to say, and the pickings would have been rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mara Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. THanks for posting this

appreciate it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC