Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whatever happened to patriotism among the wealthy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 04:47 AM
Original message
Whatever happened to patriotism among the wealthy?
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 04:54 AM by necso
When Napoleon threatened Moscow, the Czar called on the merchant class to give their aid (the quote paraphrases de Segur):

"The leader of the Moscow merchants, showed himself worthy of his station by making the first subscription of fifty thousand rubles, two thirds of his fortune, which he paid the next day.

The merchants were divided into three classes. It was proposed that each should make a fixed contribution; but one man belonging to the lowest class would brook no limit, and on the spot he obligated himself far beyond the proposed amount. The others followed his example, in varying degrees. It was said that this patriotic tribute amounted to two million rubles. The other provinces were to repeat, like so many echoes, the national cry from Moscow."

Nor when the time came to sacrifice their property to fire, did the wealthy elite hesitate. There are examples of them setting their own property on fire to deny it to the advancing enemy. Indeed, many risked, and some even lost, that greatest of treasures, their own children, in service to the nation.

Fast forward to the US today. While Washington is not about to be invaded, there is great risk to the homeland, and we are fighting in two serious military campaigns; both of which we are losing, in no small part due to the lack of resources. So does our wealthy elite offer up two thirds of their fortunes for the national good? Do they sacrifice their property, or even diminish their profits for that cause? Do they send their sons and daughters to serve the nation?

Of course not. Beneficiaries of huge tax breaks in a time of war, our wealthy elite clamors for more. Reapers of huge profits in this country, they want to put nothing back, only to take away more. As for service to country, well, that is for the "average joes", not them --- they are special --- and they demand to be treated that way.

When "Holy Mother Russia" was at risk, all the people of that nation made great sacrifices, rich and poor, great and small, because they were of one nation. So it was also, at a time not very long ago, in this country. But America has become two nations, one of whom is never asked to bear any pain or make any sacrifice. Should America ever be at risk like Russia was, our elite will not rally to the nationalist cause. No, rather they will flock to the enemy's camp and try to sell our patrimony so that they can keep their wealth and elite status. Look about you, they are selling our patrimony (and offshoring the profits) even now --- the national interest be damned!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. John Kerry demonstrated it
he signed up for duty in Vietnam, even though he was from an elite family and easily could have avoided service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. The "me" Generation came along!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fitzovich Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyandproud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. including MANY on our side..
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 06:03 AM by leftyandproud
you can bet George Soros and all of the hollywood folks minimize their tax bill in April. I actually read where John Edwards incorporated himself after winning 26 million+ in a case so he could avoid paying roughly 5 million in taxes. I don't blame him really...it's a nice chunk of change...but we should expect the repubs to do it. I just think it looks really bad when our guys do it though...especially when they oppose tax breaks at the policy level, but then take advantage of them in their personal lives. It happens on both sides of the aisle and the only way to stop it is through force. They will never voluntarily pay more than they need to, and that is the sad reality of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Patriotism" or "buying influence"?
Edited on Mon Aug-09-04 08:50 PM by Darranar
Not sure about some of this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC