Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. weighs reducing spotted owl habitat - AP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 07:52 PM
Original message
U.S. weighs reducing spotted owl habitat - AP
Source: Associated Press

U.S. weighs reducing spotted owl habitat

By JEFF BARNARD, Associated Press Writer
Tue Jun 12, 4:16 PM ET

GRANTS PASS, Ore. - The Bush administration Tuesday proposed
cutting 1.5 million acres from Northwest forests considered
critical to the survival of the northern spotted owl, reopening
the 1990s battle between timber production and wildlife habitat
on public lands.

The owl, which became a symbol of the decline of the Northwest's
timber industry, was declared a threatened species in 1990 due
primarily to heavy logging in the old growth forests where it
nests and feeds.

Recent research has noted that while old growth forests suitable
for owl habitat have increased, owl numbers have continued to
decline, and that the owl faces a new threat from a cousin, the
barred owl, that has been invading its territory.

The proposal by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was published
in the Federal Register. It calls for cutting critical habitat for
the owl from the 6.9 million acres designated in 1992 to 5.4
million acres.

-snip-

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070612/ap_on_sc/spotted_owl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. This plan makes no sense. What am I missing?
Besides the obvious fact that Bush doesn't give a flying fuck about the environment, of course.

The plan is to destroy more habitat because the species is still in decline? Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ah, you have to use Bushist "logic":
"There are fewer owls now so they need less room."

QED :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC