Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Uganda) White water torrent to die as nation gambles on huge Nile dam project - Guardian

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 10:05 PM
Original message
(Uganda) White water torrent to die as nation gambles on huge Nile dam project - Guardian
Source: The Guardian

White water torrent to die as nation gambles on huge Nile dam project

Climate change fears dampen hopes of power from
tourist attraction

Xan Rice in Bujagali Falls
Thursday May 31, 2007
The Guardian


Six miles north of Lake Victoria, the Nile awakens, exploding into a
cauldron of white water known as the Bujagali Falls. Offering some
of the world's most spectacular rafting, it is one of Uganda's top
attractions. Soon it will be destroyed.

After 13 years of seeing plans delayed by corruption allegations,
financial strife, obdurate spirits and opposition from environmental
groups, Uganda last week authorised an international consortium to
begin a 30-metre-high dam across the Nile just below Bujagali Falls.

The $800m (£400m) hydropower project - the biggest-ever foreign
investment in east Africa - will flood the rapids and, according to
critics, leave the country dangerously exposed to an energy crisis
if predictions of global warming are realised. But the government
and the World Bank, which is backing the project with $360m in
loans and guarantees, insist that it is crucial to the country's
development. "When the dam is finished we will be rid of the
darkness," said Daudi Migereko, Uganda's energy minister, at the
ceremony to approve construction.

-snip-

But huge hydropower schemes come with similar risks. As the
World Commission on Dams - a joint project of the World Bank and
the World Conservation Union - reported in 2000, the social,
environmental and financial cost of big dams often outweigh
benefits. Merowe, which has displaced 50,000 people and
submerged a rich archeological site, is a case in point. Bujagali,
according to environmentalists such as Lori Pottinger, Africa
director at the US-based International Rivers Network, is another.
"Uganda is making itself wholly dependent on a stretch of river
for its electricity," she said. "No northern country would accept
such a situation."

-snip-

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uganda/Story/0,,2091818,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. gee, the world bank.
more corporate feeding at the expense of the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah...
Edited on Thu May-31-07 05:21 AM by Dead_Parrot
You'd think the Ugandans would be happy using as much energy in a year as most Americans use in a day. The impertinence of them, wanting more!.

Clearly, the "fact" that they get 99.6% of their electricity from hydro is just a ruse to hide how insanely rich they all are.

I bet they all drive hummers, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. White water rafting for wealthy white people
versus clean energy for one of the world's poorest countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. I sure wish they'd build a nuclear plant. Get their energy and save the river.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlecBGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. it IS risky
to get most of your energy from one source, especially a source which will change in unpredictable ways due to climate change. Still, when you have as few options as they do, who are we to judge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC