Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP Junks Plan For 500 Million Pound Carbon Capture/Hydrogen Plant In Scotland - Guardian

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 12:17 PM
Original message
BP Junks Plan For 500 Million Pound Carbon Capture/Hydrogen Plant In Scotland - Guardian
Edited on Fri May-25-07 12:17 PM by hatrack
The decision by BP to scrap a revolutionary new hydrogen plant and carbon capture scheme in Scotland due to government delays was a "sad" blow to a nascent industry, officials from the sector said yesterday.

Britain's biggest company had planned to spend $1bn (£503m) on the scheme, based at Peterhead. It would have generated clean fuel by capturing and storing the carbon under the North Sea but BP said it was no longer proceeding with the plan. It said the government's timetable, revealed in Wednesday's energy white paper, for a competition to win financing for a prototype plant was too slow.

EDIT

BP was planning to store carbon from Peterhead in the Miller field in the North Sea, but to meet the government's timetable BP would have had to keep the field mothballed, which would be "uneconomic". (Ed. - emphasis added)

It said the project had already cost it $50m. The financial viability of carbon capture is still unproven, but Mr Chapman argued it should be considered alongside renewables for investment help.

EDIT/END

http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,2087713,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. "......capturing and storing the carbon under the North Sea......"
It would be cheaper and easier for them to just rent a few storage units at Public Storage and keep it in there.

Either way, I don't consider it "sequestration". What a joke. They think it will magically stay put????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razzleberry Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. the UK-gov'ts boondoggle check was not forthcoming .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC