Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bottled Water Has High Environmental Costs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 09:05 PM
Original message
Bottled Water Has High Environmental Costs
Bottled Water Has High Environmental Costs

By Deborah Zabarenko, Environment Correspondent

WASHINGTON, May 10 (Reuters) - Bottled water, the world's fastest growing beverage, carries a heavy environmental cost, adding plastic to landfills and putting pressure on natural springs, the author of a new report said on Thursday.

"Bottled water is really expensive, in terms of environmental costs and economically," said Ling Li, who wrote the report for the Washington-based Worldwatch Institute.

While many in developed countries thirst for safety, cleanliness, taste and social cachet when they buy bottled water, more than 1 billion of the world's poorest lack access to clean drinking water, bottled or not.

And in developed countries, bottled water may be scrutinized using lower standards than plain tap water, the report said.

The environmental impact can start at the source, where some local streams and underground aquifers become depleted when there is "excessive withdrawal" for bottled water, according to the report.

In addition to the energy cost of producing, bottling, packaging, storing and shipping bottled water, there is also the environmental cost of the millions of tonnes of oil-derived plastic needed to make the bottles.
End of excerpt.
~~~~~~~~~~
Corporations that sell bottled water are depleting natural resources, inflating prices, and lying when they tell you their water is purer and tastes better than the water that comes out of the tap. And Americans have been the unwitting targets of a grand campaign to make them believe that tap water is always substandard and bottled is always from a pristine flowing stream in the mountains of Maine untouched by man... and the reason for that deception should not be surprising...PROFITS.

In the past ten years the bottled water market has more than doubled in the United States becoming the second most popular beverage behind soda. Three out of four Americans drink bottled water, and spent $10 billion on bottled water last year alone which comes to an average of about 26 gallons per person. That's a lot of environmental degradation and landfill plastic just to have convenience and feel "safe" about a product that for the most part is no different than the water coming out of your tap.

Just as with the tobacco industy and the oil industy, the bottled water industry is spending tens of millions of dollars every year to undermine your confidence in tap water even though the water systems we rely on are better regulated than the bottled water industry. Tap water is regulated by the EPA which has strict guidelines regarding chemicals with testing by government agencies. Bottled water is regulated by the FDA with regulations that only apply to water that is bottled and transported between states. That leaves out a huge chunk of the water transported within states that have no guidelines attached to them with states many times leaving them to self police themselves.

Three companies control more than half the water market presently: Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and Nestle. Both Coke and Pepsi exclusively use tap water for their source while Nestle uses tap water in some brands, and even though they make claims that it is filtered several times with the processes they use it is hardly state of the art and prone to the same dangers as any other product and people are paying dearly for it. These companies harm the environment by depleting underground water sources and damaging stream systems by using affiliate companies to bottle the water for a song as they mark it up exhorbitantly to make a profit. This while people in water scarce countries literally die of thirst. To me, this practice is totally immoral. That is because this misrepresentation about tap water prohibits proper funds from being alloted to update water systems, thus opening the door up to privitization. And that is something people must fight as those in Cochabamaba Bolivia did in 2000 when Bechtel sought to privitize their water.

The first step of course is to have water declared a global human right, and for people to become more aware of just what entity is overseeing their water system. At the frantic pace of population, the excelled pace of resources dwindling including glacier melt that is happening at an accelerated rate globally and drought due to climate change, and the continued wasteful practices of humans, we are headed for a crisis of untold proportions if we do not get a handle on it now. And that also means standing up to those who would dare use this crisis as a way to make a profit from it as people in developing countries dig ever deeper hoping for just one drink a day.

People are being hoodwinked into giving huge amounts of money to an industry that takes advantage of our environment and brings in more profits than the pharmaceutical industry. One hundred billion dollars could have done a lot to bring potable water to the over one billion people in this world now without it and fix the water systems here that need it.

Water is not a commodity it is a human right. It is time those companies exploiting that right know that we are not going to take it anymore.

My other writings on this:

Stand Up To Corporations That Kill

Globalization/Time To Take Action

Who Owns The Water?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kick for unpleasant truths.
> Three companies control more than half the water market presently:
> Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and Nestle.

> These companies harm the environment by depleting underground water
> sources and damaging stream systems by using affiliate companies to
> bottle the water for a song as they mark it up exhorbitantly to make
> a profit. This while people in water scarce countries literally die of
> thirst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks
Frustating to see so many in this country really don't care about water and how they are being manipulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think I've bought 10 bottles of water in my entire life. I don't think
it tastes ANY different than the crap out of the tap, after sitting on the shelf in a plastic bottle, lol.

I have a Brita filter pitcher and use water from that for all my
drinking and cooking. Tastes great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I second the Brita
Tap water is actually more closely monitored for quality because it's EPA regulated. Utilities test many times a day for quality.

Bottled water is FDA regulated, which means it only has to meet standards if it crosses state lines. Only 30-40% of the water on the shelf meets this requirement, which means it's up to the states to regulate the other 60-70%

Plus - I wonder how much oil it takes to fly a bottle of Fiji water to the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bottled water is for environmental wastrels, AFAIAC. The energy and
resources used to make the bottle and ship it to the "water factory", the energy used to get the water to some sort of standards and into the bottle, the energy to ship the bottle thousands of miles, and then the energy required to ship the empty to a landfill, or recycler if we're lucky............WHY BOTHER?? The stuff comes out of my tap virtually free.

And I really really don't get the need to run around all day with a water bottle stuck to one's lips like a baby with a bottle of formula........sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well
Edited on Sat Jun-02-07 12:23 AM by Chovexani
And I really really don't get the need to run around all day with a water bottle stuck to one's lips like a baby with a bottle of formula........sheesh.

Clearly you don't live in the desert. Here, in the Phoenix area, people walk around with jugs of water in the summer--and it's needed. Dehydration kills people out here, and the tap water tastes like ass. Hard water is a real problem here. Before I moved, I drank tap water almost exclusively, unless it was summertime and I was nowhere near home (NYC tap water tastes better than most bottle water IMO).

I have a giant water bottle that I fill with filtered water from our Pur filter at home and carry with me, but when I run out while in the street you can believe I'm running into the Circle K for a bottle of Arrowhead or something. It's just necessity. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Same here....no bottled water, but Brita
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC