Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush' New Regulatory Chief - Cheaper For Asthmatics Stay Inside Than To Improve Air Quality

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 12:30 PM
Original message
Bush' New Regulatory Chief - Cheaper For Asthmatics Stay Inside Than To Improve Air Quality
Edited on Thu Apr-05-07 12:31 PM by hatrack
No, I'm not making this up.

WASHINGTON -- President Bush on Wednesday appointed as his top regulatory official a conservative academic who has written that markets do a better job of regulating than the government does and that it is more cost-effective for people who are sensitive to pollution to stay indoors on smoggy days than for the government to order polluters to clean up their emissions.

As director of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the White House Office of Management and Budget, Susan E. Dudley will have an opportunity to change or block regulations proposed by government agencies.

Bush also named a researcher at the Cato Institute, a Libertarian think tank in Washington, as deputy director of the Social Security Administration. Andrew G. Biggs has been an outspoken proponent of converting Social Security benefits into self-directed retirement accounts, which Bush favors but Democrats have stopped cold. Bush nominated Biggs to that post in November, but the process stalled in February when the Senate Finance Committee refused to hold confirmation

EDIT

Although Dudley's new job is more obscure than those to which Biggs and Fox were appointed, it is also potentially the most powerful. The budget office's regulatory shop acts as a funnel for all regulations emanating throughout the government. In congressional testimony, Dudley has favored dispensing with costly air pollution controls and initiating a pollution warning system "so that sensitive individuals can take appropriate 'exposure avoidance' behavior" -- mostly by remaining inside. She opposed stricter limits on arsenic in drinking water, in part because she argued that the Environmental Protection Agency's calculations of the costs and benefits overvalued some lives, particularly those of older people with a small life expectancy. She has argued that air bags should not be required by government regulation but requested by automobile consumers willing to pay for them.

EDIT

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-ne-recess5apr05,1,6382618.story?coll=la-headlines-nation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wildflowergardener Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. stay inside
So are they going to give people disability payments for asthma since they can't go to work anymore?

Also, I'd guess that all of us are affected by dirty air - so are they going to pay us to all stay home on days when the smog is bad?

Meg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. As a person with Asthma, I find this devastating.
I wish I could stick a straw in his mouth and tell him that's all the air he gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. The asthmatic says, "Doctor, every time I breathe I wheeze and cough and have trouble
....getting my breath!"

The republican doctor replies, "Well, just don't breathe."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Seems like he has great conservative idiology creditials .
I wish these greedy little fuckers had to suffer under their own directives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm sure the kids will understand
why recess is cancelled :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Are these the TWO OTHER Recess Appointments along with Fox?
Congress needs to try to do something about this. He's really more out of control every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Just as it's more cost effective to drink beer than clean up the water
The economic strategy of this administration is clear...externalize business and outsource jobs.

It's a recipe for maintaining maximum profitability while promoting societal collapse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. OMG, there ignorance and arrogance is above anything else
huh? I hate their arrogance and ignorance, hopefully, those two disgusting traits will catch up to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wow! This ranks right up there with "ketchup is a vegetable."
Edited on Thu Apr-05-07 12:53 PM by Eugene
Each BushCo recess appointment is even worse than the one that preceded it.

Dudley's concept of cost is extremely narrow (but all too typical).
Asthma costs in increased medical care and decreased productivity,
but that doesn't necessary show up on a balance sheet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. more of a "let 'em eat cake" moment
Do they still make guillotines, or are we going to have to improvise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. read more here, the "lady" is a nutjob.
The below link has links to her docs.

http://www.ombwatch.org/article/blogs/entry/2140/38

Thursday, August 10, 2006

Dudley: The Missing Docs
Well, it didn't take too long at all -- the Mercatus Center has silently restored the documents OMB Watch identified as missing from Susan Dudley's profile page.

Now you can read for yourself why she hates the Davis-Bacon Act, thinks that giving the public a right to know about the toxic hazards it is exposed to should be eliminated or weakened in the name of fighting terrorism, and believes that improving standards for arsenic in the drinking water is an unwelcome distraction from the task of protecting the water supply. That, and more.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Cancer too
Once upon a time these libertarian idiots said it was cheaper to cure cancer than prevent it.
Can anyone say "health care crisis."

This is one of the main reasons for universal health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoelace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dudley Do-Wrong and her Koch Oil connection - heads up folks!
arrgghh, another appointee with too much power and connections to Koch Oil!

See link for details - this person is a creep! Somebody warn our congress about her - investigate please!!

"According to a post at Think Progress, a project of the Center for American Progress, Dudley, as the director of regulatory studies at Mercatus, has:

Opposed EPA plans to set tougher public health standards for smog.
Opposed lower-polluting cars and SUVs and cleaner gasoline.
Opposed air bags in cars, preferring to leave public safety decisions "to the market place."
Opposed stronger regulations for arsenic in drinking water, claming that there "is a wide range of uncertainty in the science surrounding the health effects of arsenic in U.S. drinking water supplies."
Opposed measures to curb global warming, stating that the "evidence regarding global warming and human contribution to it is mixed, and...if a slight warming does occur, historical evidence suggests it is likely to be beneficial, occurring at night, in the winter, and at the poles. Taking 'precautionary action' to protect human health based on a series of tenuous linkages would likely create a new set of risks."

http://www.mediatransparency.org/story.php?storyID=138
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. opposed air bags -- why does this not surprise me
i suppose those lead paint restrictions were bogus too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. REC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. 5th-would be MUCH more cost effective to LOCK UP BUSH and cronies nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. History will not look kindly on the far right
or on Congress, for failing to uphold its Constitutional duty and impeach both Bush AND Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hun Joro Donating Member (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. This makes me think of The Running Man
Not the movie, but the novelette by Stephen King, in which "asthma" had reached epidemic levels, but wasn't really asthma but usually emphysema or lung cancer, caused by air pollution and diagnosed as asthma by the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. I hope the sewer backs up into her house and ruins everything.
If she thinks that's a problem she can simply go outside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. Any troops w/ asthma?
If so, then bring them home and thats a start, for that whole mess. Onto the next mess.. Do these appointees ever use a brain cell? Are they required not to? Or are they required not to have any, to begin with?

Sometimes I feel like I'm living in a poorly written novel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
21. Cheaper to keep soldiers home than to fight a war -- same logic. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
22. XemaSab to new regulatory chief: cheaper for yo' ass to stay inside than go to the hospital
after I give you the beatdown you richly deserve for making such an ignorant, cruel statement. :o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
23. may Susan get asthma

and may she fall down and not get up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
24. Dudley also believes companies should make the regs not the gov't
and she believes it is too costly to lower the levels of arsenic from water especially since only the infirm and aged are likely to die from the current levels.

She also was instrumental in getting OMB's rules changed in January which makes it almost impossible to set up climate change regs. Any climate change reg will now have to pass through several levels of review and the final okay will be in her new office.

http://scienceblogs.com/integrityofscience/2007/04/white_house_offices_twofisted.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC