|
I'm glad to hear they did this.
I wrote an editorial about something along these lines a while back, here it is:
Javaman (1000+ posts) Fri Aug-25-06 04:38 PM Original message Peak oil and states rights...
I have been pondering the various potential out comes of a post peak oil era.
One thing that occurred to me was the idea or concept of states rights.
Going back in our history, our civil war was fought for many reasons, the obvious one was over slavery, however, the slavery issue was prompted by a cry from the southern states regarding their own states rights and who gets to decide or enforce them. They were angry that the federal government, in flexing it's muscles, were treading over these rights. Prior to the civil war, individual states looked upon themselves almost as the various European nations looked upon themselves prior to the formation of the EU. Individual state nations that were part of a larger organizations. After the civil war, that debate was ended and a true united states was born. Where upon, states rights no longer superseded the will of federal law, but was in fact now reversed.
Much of this resentment lasted many many years well up into the 20th century. Huge sections of the U.S., mostly the hard to reach areas, still looked upon the north and the federal government in general with resentment and would still not recognize federal law.
These still areas were brought under "control", if you will, via rural electrification. Once you can bill, track a person and their various power needs, they suddenly become easier to control, follow and check up upon. And the person receiving the electricity, now has one thing less to complain about. Thus pacifying another section of the U.S.
That is going to change.
When we are beyond peak oil and the price of a barrel of oil no longer becomes cost effective for the average person to use in its various broken down components, the rise of the local power authorities offering alternative methods to heat and power their homes will take hold.
No longer will the traditional power grid be the norm for the nation. As different parts of the country use various types of alt fuel and power suited to their regions, the federal control of the nations power resources will diminish.
Coastal communities will look to biomass, wave and wind power, central regions, to wind, solar and perhaps a form of ethanol. The list goes on and on, but the picture becomes clear that there will be no one type of power generating source, such as oil and natural gas were, to keep the nation humming.
Now what does this have to do with states rights?
Given the fact that many of the states in this nation have large areas of land to which they can exploit for various power generating means, there will be many questions raised regarding those smaller states that do not have that ability.
Many of the larger states also have huge populations and the various governors of these states will think of their states needs before they think of what is good for the nation. Hence the question of states rights, especially when the federal government begins trying to federalize these various energy producing sources. Or at least try to engineer it so only a few of the wealthy control the vast alt energy resources, thus holding leverage over the many who don't.
Unlike oil, many alt energy resources are available to anyone who has the means to exploit them. As a result, will a future situation arise where it become illegal for the private person to install solar panels on their homes with out federal or state approval? Will laws be enacted that keeps people from freely using what nature has provided us? wind and solar power?
In steps the states.
Will the states that have these large areas suddenly not only share it's additional energy with other states but also ignore the federal governments laws when they feel their rights to their state born resources are infringed upon?
Will the once again lead to the question of who owns that energy that is generated by the alt means? And will that in turn lead to a bigger issue of how far into the states will the federal government reach in order to control the populous via energy distribution?
As the smaller states band together to form various energy agreements and the larger states become their own energy providers, where does this leave the federal government in this new found energy landscape?
Will the Federal government force the states into an agreement under the lofty statement that this is policy to maintain the good of the nation? Or will it us force to keep various states in line? Or a combination of the two?
Will, as many sci-fi writers have proposed, many of the western states simply ignore a weak federal government, itself strapped for and in need of a new form of energy, form their own break away nation or federation based upon their ability to be self sufficient of Washington's needs and wants?
I have proposed a lot of scenarios and some possibly outrageous situations, however, we must, as a nation, come to realize that we are, we have become, we exist because of oil.
Our future as a country, if we wish to maintain it as a union, must be based upon cooperation between states. Unless some sound energy policy is presented within the next 5 years, the little baby elephant that sits in the corner looking all cute, will grow into an adult male bull and will seek out a way to leave the house and go out on it's own. It will be very hard to control it at that point.
Our nation will not only be presented with an energy emergency of a proportion I can hardly imagine, but the political fall out as a result will be just as devastating.
|