Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Aviation: a grossly polluting industry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 03:01 PM
Original message
Aviation: a grossly polluting industry
By Sophie Hares

Sydney - In Sydney airport's crowded international terminal, passengers make last-minute passport checks or fret over toddlers in prams as they wait in the snaking queue to check in for the 23-hour flight to London.

But few of the 400 passengers crammed on to each jumbo jet taking off over Botany Bay ever consider the environmental impact of their 17 000km intercontinental trip.

Passengers will consume at least 1 600 meals in plastic containers, but each plane travelling to London will guzzle more than 200 tons of jet fuel and pump out more than 500 tons of carbon dioxide, as well as other greenhouse gases.

"Beneath the glamorous high-flying image of aviation is a grossly polluting industry," said Paul de Zylva, head of Friends of the Earth in London.

http://iol.co.za/index.php?click_id=31&art_id=vn20040524074826349C853745&set_id=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. One word
Dirigibles.

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. If you work this out, the fuel cost is, 60 miles per person per gallon.
200,000 kg of fuel for 400 people is 34 kg per person. The density of gasoline is 740 kg/m^3 meaning that the fuel for one person is contained in 0.676 m^3 or 676 liters or, converting, 178 gallons. The trip is 17,000 km or 10600 miles. Dividing miles by gallons gives 60 miles per gallon for each person. It's not really bad when when compares the cost of doing this trip by most other means.

The energy advantages derive, of course, from low wind resistance, economy of scale, and the absence of stops.

Attempting to do the trip by car would be very expensive in an environmental sense. A train, however, might be cheaper environmentally, if one could justify the environmental and economic cost of the time lost.

Of course, if one had lots of time, one could sail to accomplish the same trip. Better would be if in a swords to plowshares kind of move, the US Navy converted the Aircraft carrier Nimitz, which is nuclear powered, into a cruise ship. As a pacifist, I couldn't think of a better outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC