Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More efficient solar cells:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Salviati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 12:44 AM
Original message
More efficient solar cells:
Looks like there's some compitition for improving the effiency of solar cells... For those who missed the thread from a while back on the new material discovered allowing a full spectrum solar cell it can be found here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=115&topic_id=7640

but it looks like this idea has got some compitition:

http://www.trnmag.com/Stories/2004/051904/Solar_crystals_get_2-for-1_051904.html

Researchers from Los Alamos National Laboratory have tapped the efficiencies of nanotechnology to increase solar cells' potential energy production by as much as 37 percent.
...
The Los Alamos researchers have found that it is possible to increase a cell's energy production by making each photon move two electrons. "Carrier-multiplication-enhanced solar cells can, in principle, produce twice as large a current as conventional solar cells," said Victor Klimov, a team leader at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
...
This happens via impact ionization. "In this effect, the conduction-band electron energy is transferred to the valence-band electron and excites it across the energy gap," said Klimov. "As a result, instead of one conduction-band electron we have two electrons that can contribute to electrical current," he said. "Normally, without impact ionization, the... energy is lost as heat."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TreeHuggingLiberal Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. I know this is off topic...
But Sifl and Olly rock!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. These cells utilize lead selenide.
Both lead and selenium are toxic metals. Thus these cells are likely to have a high environmental external cost, not as high as coal, but higher than nuclear and wind power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC