I ask in part because I work for a tech company and we are still ironing out bugs that resulted from the change. It's been worse than the 2000 scare.
The Bushies have never cared much about saving energy, we all know that. In fact they oppose any policy that would decrease energy consumption.
On top of that, the California Energy Commission concluded that there is no clear evidence the change would have an effect on energy consumption. They actually concluded there's a 25% chance it would increase energy consumption (see text below).
My guess is, Bush was sitting around one day, thinking about new ways to have more power. It's not enough to control the world - I want to control the TIME too!
Any other thoughts? Why did they do it?
============
From the CA Energy Commission report:
http://www.energy.ca.gov/2007publications/CEC-200-2007-001/CEC-200-2007-001.PDFElectricity Savings from Early Daylight Saving Time
Synopsis: There is no clear evidence that electricity will be saved from the earlier start to
daylight saving time on March 11, but the 7 p.m. peak load will probably drop on the
order of 3% for the remainder of March, lowering capacity requirements. This could be
negated by a new morning spike as it was in Australia in 2000, but that appears unlikely.
In any event, capacity constraints usually do not occur in March and early November.
Summary: In 2000 and 2001, the Energy Commission created simulations to model what
would happen to electricity use if Daylight Saving Time (DST) began early. The
simulations examined how electricity use would respond to newly darker and cooler
mornings using cool dark winter mornings as a reference point, and how electricity use
would respond to lighter and warmer evenings by looking at those in the summer.
Implicit in the model is the assumption that people maintain their daily schedules rather
than change wake-up or work hours in response to either changing seasons or Daylight
Saving Time.
We found that if people do maintain their daily schedules then spring and fall Daylight
Saving Time extensions would probably cause a 2 to 5% drop in the evening peak load.
Meanwhile, morning electricity use would grow some, but probably not enough to offset
evening savings. The net effect is small and uncertain: a best guess of total net energy
savings is on the order of ! of one percent, but savings could just as well be zero.
Moreover, our statistical analysis leaves us with one chance in four there could be a very
small increase in electricity use.
The possibility of an increase in electric use is not just academic. A recent study of the
impact of DST in the state of Victoria Australia found that when DST came 2 months
early for the 2000 Olympics, residents of Victoria experienced a sharp morning spike in
electricity use resulting in an overall increase in consumption and peak load.