Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Insurers' Retreat From US Coastline Continues - Baltimore Sun

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 08:35 PM
Original message
Insurers' Retreat From US Coastline Continues - Baltimore Sun
As insurance companies retreat from their coverage of coastal areas along the Eastern Seaboard, legislators in Annapolis and other state capitals are stepping in to protect homeowners faced with fewer and fewer options.

Maryland legislators have grilled insurance executives at hearings and introduced bills that would force companies to cover all areas of the state. Lawmakers also are looking at granting the state's top regulator more authority over the industry, and offering tax breaks to encourage residents to safeguard their homes against storm damage.

The confrontation comes as Allstate Corp., State Farm Insurance Cos. and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. - three of the largest insurers in Maryland - have moved to limit their liability along the Atlantic Coast and in some cases near the Chesapeake Bay, areas feared to be at heightened risk from hurricanes. Similar changes have been made in other coastal areas; State Farm recently decided to stop selling new policies on homes and small businesses in all of Mississippi.

"We have to send the message you just can't pick and choose based on some prediction of what may happen in the future," said Sen. Norman R. Stone Jr., a Baltimore County Democrat. "If things were 100 percent guaranteed, you wouldn't need insurance."

EDIT

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-te.md.coastal18feb18,0,240422.story?coll=bal-local-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's the surprise? Health insurance companies do the same thing every day. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't agree with forcing private insurance companies to
insure risky areas. If they do, the property owner should have to pay out the nose for living there if he wants coverage. I also don't want the government to insure vacation homes on the beach with my tax dollars.

I say, let the coastal areas turn back into wilderness areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. the south coast may become uninhabitable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is gonna piss off a lot of people but for once
I don't blame the insurance companies. Why make a bet you're almost guaranteed to lose? Sounds to me like those insurers have pretty much bought into global warming, they know it's inevitable and they don't want to risk their investor's money paying off claims from people who didn't act wisely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moby Grape Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. if you don't like it, move n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Beachfront condo owners can insure themselves
without taxpayer subsidies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. I agree they should have to insure an entire state, not cherry pick it. They've made their
Edited on Sun Feb-18-07 10:05 PM by williesgirl
millions off these homeowners and now that they may have a risk, they're trying to bolt.

Plus, keep in mind, at least in the case of Allstate, they are charging all of their customers for Katrina, etc. My premium went sky high - when I called to see why, they informed me that $300 of the semi-annual increase was to cover those losses. I promptly found a small insurance company with reasonable rates, and tossed Allstate because of it. I live on a mountain, not in a flood or hurricane zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC