Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Premier: Alberta Won't Slow Oilsands Growth, Claims GHG Cuts By Province, Later Retracts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:26 PM
Original message
Premier: Alberta Won't Slow Oilsands Growth, Claims GHG Cuts By Province, Later Retracts
EDMONTON (CP) - Premier Ed Stelmach warned Monday of "dire economic consequences" if Alberta were ever forced to slow oilsands development to curb emissions that cause global warming. Stelmach called reporters to his office to respond to what he said were recent comments by Ontario MP Mark Holland, the Liberal natural resources critic.

Holland was asked on a radio talk show if the Liberals would nationalize the oilsands if Alberta refused to go along with federal efforts to curb developments that increase emissions. He responded by saying that a Liberal government would try to "work with (Alberta) collaboratively," but added "there will be consequences" if the province refused.

Stelmach described the comments as "reprehensible" and insisted the Liberals were threatening to grab control of the oilsands. "When we hear talk of perhaps nationalizing the oilsands - a moratorium on oilsands development will bring about dire economic consequences right across the country."

EDIT

Stelmach also threw out some figures Monday suggesting Alberta has taken a leading role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. "Alberta is the only province on record that has actually reduced CO2 emissions by 16 per cent," he said. But the premier later conceded he was talking about so-called emissions intensity, which is a measurement against the growth in industrial production rather than a total measurement of what's coming out of the smoke stack. If a company increases emissions at a slower rate than it increases production, then emissions intensity is reduced even though absolute emissions have increased. An Alberta Environment official later confirmed that total emissions have increased by 40 per cent since 1990, but emissions intensity is down by 16 per cent over the same period.

EDIT

http://www.brandonsun.com/story.php?story_id=42006

So, forty = negative sixteen. Interesting arithmetic there, Ed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lautremont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I knew this Ed guy was a tool.
That's what "simple man of the people" seems to be code for these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Was this the guy who went off on some people in a homeless shelter?
I remember a Canadian politician out west doing this fairly recently, but couldn't remember if this was the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lautremont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That was Ralph Klein, a true piece of work and another man of the people.
This guy is new and supposed to be more moderate and less likely to get drunk and tell guys in a homeless shelter that they were bums and should get jobs.

If Ralph was like a loud fart in church, this guy is an SBD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah, THAT'S who I was thinking of.
Also, sort of a naive oversimplified question from someone south of the border:

Is Alberta basically the Texas of Canada?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lautremont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It pretty much is.
A theory on that is that a whole bunch of homesteaders, making their way West across the States, found it easier to make a right turn and head North into Alberta rather than cross the Rockies. That's how we ended up with our own small version of America, or, specifically, Texas. The oil riches couldn't have hurt the Texification process either, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. More screaming into the empty room...
yes he is a tool. Yes, he stands to make loads of money from the oil sands. No he doesn't give a flying fuck about the average Canadian.

At the end of the day, the ratios vary, but the total amount of out put from the oil sands will basically equal the amount of energy it needs to extract it. Some have even calculated that there will be a default on the energy required to extract it at 4 barrels of oil expended for every 1 extracted.

So why on earth would one think that the oil companies would piss away such money on a losing proposition? Because they are banking on long term returns. Sadly, unless they come up with some kind of new fangled super cheap solution to extract the oil, it will only get worse, because right now they are getting at the easy stuff. Wait till it become harder to extract deeper stuff later on. Or just run out of water. They never like to talk about that part.

I sometimes get the image of several passengers fighting over the same life preserver on the Titanic. Only one can use it but everyone wants to be that one.

In the end, there will be less people by our own stupid design.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC