Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ElBaradei's Idea for (nuclear) `Timeout' With Iran Is Rejected by U.S.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 04:33 PM
Original message
ElBaradei's Idea for (nuclear) `Timeout' With Iran Is Rejected by U.S.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aIY6psePXtfA&refer=home

Jan. 29 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. today rejected a proposal by the head of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog agency for a ``simultaneous'' freeze on Iran's uranium enrichment and on Security Council sanctions adopted last month.

``There is a path laid out for suspension'' of the UN sanctions against Iran, U.S. Acting Ambassador Alejandro Wolff told reporters in New York. ``That is Iranian suspension of their enrichment activities to be responded to by the council. That is very clear and it is not subject to reinterpretation.''

Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said in an interview with CNN on Jan. 26 that he favors a ``simultaneous timeout'' that would include the suspension of UN sanctions and Iranian uranium enrichment. The effort to produce a higher concentration of a uranium isotope needed for nuclear fission can be a step toward a bomb.

The Security Council voted unanimously on Dec. 23 to impose sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program, including a demand that enrichment efforts stop. The measure also calls for a ban on Iran's acquisition of materials and technology that might be used to build an atomic bomb.

<more>

tick...tick...tick...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. The BFFE aka the 'US'
will not accept anything that does not include them controlling Iran's oil there by cutting off a major amount of China's petroleum or at least making a bundle from suppling them or in other words WAR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC