Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Large-Scale, Cheap Solar Electricity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 12:19 PM
Original message
Large-Scale, Cheap Solar Electricity
This week, Nanosolar, a startup in Palo Alto, CA, announced plans to build a production facility with the capacity to make enough solar cells annually to generate 430 megawatts. This output would represent a substantial portion of the worldwide production of solar energy.

According to Nanosolar's CEO Martin Roscheisen, the company will be able to produce solar cells much less expensively than is done with existing photovoltaics because its new method allows for the mass-production of the devices. In fact, maintains Roscheisen, the company's technology will eventually make solar power cost-competitive with electricity on the power grid.

Nanosolar also announced this week more than $100 million in funding from various sources, including venture firms and government grants. The company was founded in 2001 and first received seed money in 2003 from Google's founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin.

Experts say Nanosolar’s ambitious plans for such a large factory are surprising. "It's an extraordinary number,” says Ken Zweibel, who heads up thin-film research at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, CO. Most groups building new solar technologies “add maybe 25 or 50 megawatts," he says. "The biggest numbers are closer to 100. So it's a huge number, and it's a huge number in a new technology, so it's doubly unusual. All the in the world is 1,700 megawatts.">>>snip

http://www.techreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=17025&ch=biztech


good news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. We could probably have successful solar farms in South
Texas for most of the year. But isntead we are getting an additional two nuclear reactors at the Bay City South Texas Nuclear Project.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If the cost go down enough the homeowner could
place these on his roof and be a part of the grid rather than spend his tax monies on a corporate boondoggle such as nuclear power-plants that cost billions and have a questionable payback time,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. More from the article
Meanwhile, Andrew Gabor, senior engineer at Evergreen Solar, a silicon solar-cell developer
and manufacturer in Marlboro, MA, says current supply problems related to conventional solar cells
are easing as more production capacity is coming on line. This could mean that prices for silicon cells start dropping again,
eventually becoming competitive with grid electricity.
He suggests that in the future solar electricity supply will likely be met by a mix of technologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's too soon to tell...
...because it's only one monthly data point, but it appears the peak of the silicon crunch may have arrived at the retail level -- prices leveled from this month to last, at least when denomonated in euros rather than the collapsing U.S. dollar...



The June survey results carried a different mood to those of recent months.

Through the whole of 2005 and early 2006, there has been significant price activity and the ratio of increases to decreases has typically been strongly in favor of the former.

There was one result in February 2006, which this month's survey result mirrors. This month, the survey outcome was within a whisker of the first result for over two years where the number of price decreases exceeded increases.

For a single month result, this is simply an observation of note. It is unwise to conclude too much from any single result, and trends are created over multiple month results. Even though the February 2006 survey showed a slow down in the rate of increases, this was followed by a three month spell where there was one of the strongest price run ups seen over the last two years.



http://www.solarbuzz.com/Moduleprices.htm

More. Faster. Cheaper. :-)

(P.S. did anyone see the David Spade show last night? He had a pretty funny "where's my jet pack" rant.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. If they get the price down to $1.00 per watt, I'm in.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is great news,
it's what the world has been waiting for imho. Inexpensive solar energy just think about it, we can get off the grid if we choose.

The next thing is the electric car, once we get that and get all these technologies in the hands of our citizens we can really start cleaning up our planet.

I suggest we start on clean water, it's not discussed much but it needs to be. I know it will be years before these technologies get in the hands of consumers, but it gives me hope and i can use a little hope right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC