Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Inconvenient Truth - Bush Climate "Strategy" A Failure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 12:03 PM
Original message
Another Inconvenient Truth - Bush Climate "Strategy" A Failure
Here's an inconvenient truth for President Bush: His voluntary attack on global warming isn't working. The Government Accountability Office reported last week that projects begun in 2002 and 2003 to encourage private businesses to reduce greenhouse gases "appear not to be progressing at the rate expected by the sponsoring agencies." That's an understatement.

As of November, only 38 of 74 companies in the Environmental Protection Agency's "Climate Leaders" program had set emissions reduction targets. Eleven of 15 trade groups in the Energy Department's "Climate VISION" had targets, and five had even reported their emissions. But goals varied widely in terms of measurement, geographic scope and time period. Many companies are making their goals contingent on federal paybacks, such as tax incentives or regulatory relief.

But neither the EPA nor the Energy Department seemed too concerned. The GAO found the agencies negligent by failing to set deadlines or benchmarks for progress. Neither agency spelled out consequences for scofflaws. Even if these programs were working, results would be suspect because overlapping enrollments mean reductions could easily be counted twice, the GAO found.

A do-it-yourself approach with haphazard oversight will make no dent in global warming - which may require a whopping 60-percent emissions reduction by mid-century. "Given the potential gravity of the climate change problem, programs such as Climate Leaders and Climate VISION will need to be especially robust and involve a substantial portion of the economy if they are going to achieve the desired results," the GAO concludes.

The GAO is far too polite.

EDIT

http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/news/opinion/14720175.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, it's working alright. Just the way they want it to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC