|
http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=44936Peterborough, NH When Exxon-Mobile reported the highest annual profit of any company in U.S. history last year ($36.1 billion), advocates of clean energy -- along with economically squeezed motorists -- saw a way to balance the scales: direct a portion of the oil companies' windfall toward alternate sources of fuel. As prices at the pump climbed and accusations of price gouging ensued, the idea gained widespread support.
"Our Initiative specifically prohibits the oil companies from passing along this tax to consumers. It is specifically prohibited in the language of the law."-- Julie Buckner, Californians For Clean Energy, media and communication director
In Congress, however, the notion of private corporations giving up some of their earnings for the greater public good has not gained momentum, and the oil industry has steadfastly denied jacking up prices in the face of tightening supply. According to oil industry officials, the high cost of gasoline is a function of market forces beyond its control. Lackluster production from Iraq, Bolivia and Nigeria, and increased world demand, particularly from China, has driven up prices, industry officials say.
The price gouging case may be impossible to prove, but now Californians For Clean Energy (CFCE), an organization backed by Hollywood producer Steven Bing and Silicon Valley venture capitalist Vinod Khosla, has channeled popular sentiment into proposed legislation. The Clean Alternative Energy Initiative -- which, according to CFCE, is well on its way to the November 2006 ballot -- calls for a special tax on crude oil produced in or off the coast of California.
<more>
|