Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Navy LFA Sonar refuted by NRDC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 05:56 PM
Original message
Navy LFA Sonar refuted by NRDC
I just received the following email. This case appears to have a decent and thoughtful Judge listening to the NGOs rather than making a rash decision. This case is a good argument for keeping chimpy's judges from being appointed. Matter of fact, more women judges would probably be better for us all.

As an ex-submariner who used to repair and operate sonar (not LFA), I can see the value of having LFA sonar to find new generation diesel-electric subs all tricked-out with "ultra-quiet technology" that may approach our coasts. But presently, and probably for the next few years anyway, our enemies don't have these subs in the inventory. It's on the drawing boards, and German U-boats are coming out of the shipyards, but are not sold to our enemies. China needs to be watched closely.

Maybe if we elect a Leader like President Clinton again with the remarkable talent of making us the friends of the international community, instead of wreaking havoc and making them despise us like AWOL-boy, we won't need sophisticated sonar to fend off an enemy nation imho.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear NRDC BioGems Defender,

I wish you could have been with us in court last week as we argued our landmark
case to save millions of marine mammals from the Navy's deadly LFA sonar system.

Getting this case to U.S. District Court has been an enormous undertaking:
eight years of legal sparring with the Navy; hundreds of pages of carefully
drafted legal arguments; tens of thousands of pages of documents entered into
the court record; and a never-say-die belief on our part that the health of
ocean ecosystems will one day prevail over the world's most powerful military
establishment.

But, above all, the road to the courthouse door was paved with thousands and
thousands of letters and contributions from caring people like you. That's why,
with a ruling in this case still a month away, I wanted you to know right away
that we fought the good fight on your behalf last week. The rest is now up to
Judge Elizabeth LaPorte.

As you know, Judge LaPorte stunned the Navy last fall by blocking deployment of
LFA sonar across 75 percent of the world's oceans until this case could be
heard in full and all of NRDC's evidence presented. It is unusual for a judge
to clamp this kind of injunction on the military -- especially in times like
these -- unless the case against the government is exceedingly strong. We have
that kind of case.

Judge LaPorte's courageous ruling last year signaled that the Bush
administration had likely violated multiple laws when it gave the Navy
permission to harass and injure thousands of marine mammals by flooding ocean
habitats with high-intensity noise.

Since then, NRDC's case has only gotten stronger. We have uncovered reams of
new evidence -- much of it drawn from the Navy's own files -- that high-powered
LFA noise can cause hemorrhaging in whales, internal injuries in fish, and
seizures in human divers.

When our Marine Mammal Protection staff entered the courtroom last week, they
encountered a phalanx of Bush administration lawyers and a parade of the
government's top scientific experts. But that formidable array of government
talent (all paid for by your tax dollars!) faced an uphill battle trying to
refute the almost overwhelming case against LFA sonar that we have
painstakingly constructed over the past decade.

Based on Judge LaPorte's many thoughtful questions, there is little doubt that
she understands the far-reaching dangers posed by this technology -- as well as
the illegal manner in which the Bush administration approved its deployment.

All we can do now is wait and hope that Judge LaPorte will impose a permanent
ban on the global deployment of this acoustic menace until such a day as the
Navy can prove it has complied with federal law and will do no serious harm to
marine life. I will, of course, alert you via email the minute we have the
judge's ruling in hand.

On behalf of our entire legal team, I want to thank you again for coming to the
defense of marine mammals around the world and making this historic case
possible.

Sincerely,

John H. Adams
President
Natural Resources Defense Council

. . .

BioGems: Saving Endangered Wild Places
A project of the Natural Resources Defense Council
http://www.savebiogems.org

Note: We appreciate the opportunity to communicate with you and other NRDC
BioGems Defenders, but if you would prefer not to receive BioGems updates or
hear from BioGems activists in the field, you can send an email message to
biogemsdefenders@savebiogems.org with "Please remove my name" in the subject
line.

To update your information, including your email or mailing address, log in to
your Action Visa at http://www.savebiogems.org/actionvisa/ and click "Update
your info."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks Submariner
very interesting stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC