Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Polar Bears Of Churchill Will Be First Population Destroyed By Climate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:05 PM
Original message
Polar Bears Of Churchill Will Be First Population Destroyed By Climate
EDIT

It's tempting to think of climate change in terms of elusive numbers and future scenarios -- a spiking line graph of global temperature, a virtual glacier receding on a climatologist's computer screen. But the ravages of climate change are already being felt by people and communities. Northern towns like Churchill, dependent on one major resource for its economic survival, may be the most vulnerable. As the ice on the Hudson Bay disappears, biologists and climatologists predict the town's bears will soon be the first polar bear population wiped out by global warming. This is not welcome news in Churchill. The town's fate and that of the bears may be terribly intertwined.

"The bears are a big draw because they're an exotic animal," town counselor Mike Iwanowsky explained about the town's booming tourism industry. "They're a symbolic animal. You think of the North, you think of polar bears. You think of winter, you think of polar bears. They're, I don't know, 'chic.'" Iwanowsky, a brawny man with a daunting red goatee, was clearly not comfortable using the word. After falling on hard times in the '70s, Churchill found a way to leverage the menace surrounding it into big business. More than 10,000 tourists now visit the self-made "Polar Bear Capital of the World" each fall. For six weeks, beginning in mid-October, when the bears amass near town, beat-up school buses cart visitors toward the tundra every morning and all the restaurants fill up at the end of the day. Hotels and shops sell embroidered fleeces and high-priced bear kitsch.

EDIT

Churchill's bear population is the southernmost in the world and, like its human population, subsists under less than ideal conditions. Hudson Bay is not frozen all year. After roaming the ice all winter, gorging on seals, the bears decamp where the last ice melts at the southeast of town. They spend the summer on land, living off reserves in what's called "waking hibernation." But an influx of fresh water into the bay makes the area north of Churchill first to freeze again. And so, each fall, the bears lurch off the tundra toward it, anticipating their first opportunity to get back on the ice where they'll spend another winter ambushing seal pups. The town, of course, is in their way.

But Hudson Bay now melts earlier in the spring and freezes later in the fall, leaving the bears marooned on land for longer stretches of time. Ian Stirling, a leading polar bear researcher with the Canadian Wildlife Service, says the summer season has extended by about three weeks over the last 30 years. Churchill's bear population has fallen nearly 20 percent in the last 20 years, and U.S. and Canadian biologists have correlated the decline to earlier spring melts. Recently a female bear was found torn apart and devoured by a larger male -- which, like the increase in bears' venturing into town, may be a sign of "nutritional stress." Meanwhile, projections show Hudson Bay becoming nearly free of ice, year-round, by mid- to late-century. William A. Gough, a climatologist at the University of Toronto Scarborough, has spent a decade analyzing 35 years of sea ice records in Hudson Bay. He's projected its future using six different climate models created by government agencies around the world. "The Canadian model shows total ice reduction by 2050," he said. By 2080, when the carbon-dioxide concentration in the atmosphere will have tripled, the other models show the same result. "By the end of the century," he said, "there will be no platform for polar bears." And no platform for bear tourism.

EDIT

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/03/17/churchill/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Poor bastards
Serves them right for not voting Republican, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, they doubtless hate Freedom and America, to boot
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And they don't drive GM SUVs...
Can I go home now? I don't want to play this game anymore.

Oh fuck. This is home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. This makes me feel sad and powerless.
Churchill was always on my "to do" list. Even if I could afford to go there now, I'm not sure I could enjoy myself knowing that the bears will soon all starve to death. Once the situation is hopeless it might be more humane to just shoot them all. They'll tear each other (and whatever else is in their path) apart. The residents of Churchill themselves will be on the menu, I imagine. A starving animal is very dangerous and in a hell of a lot of misery.

I suppose they could be relocated, but that may not work. Other polar bear populations would be affected by moving the bears and the Churchill bears may not know how to sustain themselves in other regions. Also, there might be a danger of transmitting disease when exposing different populations to one another. I'm not a bear expert, so I don't know. It looks to me like these poor bears are doomed and it makes me sick.

When will we know there is no hope and what should we do about it?

God, this is sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Last Chance to See
Douglas Adams wrote a book in the 90s titled Last Chance to See, where he traveled around the world, visiting various animals threatened by extinction. In a way, the existence of the book itself was the most powerful message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I love Douglas Adams' work.
I have to admit I was disappointed by the new Hitchhikers movie. Blah. Somehow it didn't capture the humor of the book. Maybe only a book can do that. The movie seemed like a blend of British and American humor and it didn't work very well in my opinion.

I wasn't aware of this title. Now I'll have to put yet another book on my wish list. You know, it's sad when you can't even afford books anymore. Our library is very small and sucks. Also, there's a fundy women from my past who works in there. It's hard for me to even go in and I live right next to the damn thing. I was thinking about trying booksfree.com . It's bound to have a much wider selection than my stupid local library. It will cost a little, but less than the late frees I tend to accrue. :shrug:

Why am I whining about books? :shrug: It's morning and the caffeine hasn't hit my system. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You haven't read it yet?
:spank: Bad hawk.

It's heartbreaking in many ways, painfully funny, and very, very Douglassy - and IIRC, the book he'd preferred to be rembered for (which he won't be, but that's life)...

There's a chunk of "Last Chance" at http://www.tdv.com/lastchance to whet your appetite while you're looking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I paid $8.50 for a trade paperback last week.
I remember buying paperbacks for $2 when I was a teenager. And walking to school uphill, both ways.

The HGG movie did leave me feeling vaguely disappointed. I can't put my finger on why. The humor was there. It just didn't live up to my memories of falling off the couch laughing at the books. Could be just the difference between reading the book at 16 years old and watching the movie at 36.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. $!#!@%# duplicate post
Edited on Tue Mar-21-06 02:58 PM by phantom power

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC