Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study Shows Farmed Salmon PCB Levels 7X That Of Wild Fish - NYT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 10:23 AM
Original message
Study Shows Farmed Salmon PCB Levels 7X That Of Wild Fish - NYT
"A new study of fillets from 700 salmon, wild and farmed, finds that the farmed fish consistently have more PCB's and other contaminants, but at levels far below the limits set by the federal government.

The study, the largest so far to look at contaminants in salmon, is being published today in the journal Science. It found more than a sevenfold difference in PCB levels, with farmed salmon having an average of 36.63 parts per billion and wild salmon having 4.75.

The authors advised people to limit their consumption of salmon. "Although the risk/benefit computation is complicated," they wrote, "consumption of farmed Atlantic salmon may pose risks that detract from the beneficial effects of fish consumption."

EDIT

Officials of the Food and Drug Administration disputed the study's recommendations. "We certainly don't think there's a public health concern here," said Dr. Terry Troxell, director of the agency's office of plant and dairy foods and beverages. "Our advice to consumers is not to alter their consumption of farmed or wild salmon."

EDIT

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/09/science/09SALM.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Pass that mad piece of beef instead
Or maybe a little tuna to feed my mercury jones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Times headline is a little misleading
Seven times almost zero is still almost zero and that appears to be the case here. Also, if one reads the Science article, it is clear that not all farm raised salmon should be considered together in terms of contaminants. The levels from European farms were much higher than the levels from Canadian and Chilean farms. OTOH the FDA guy probably goes a little too far when he says there is no public health concern. People should always be concerned about contaminants in food. It is a question of balancing risks. In this case it appears that the benefits of salmon consumption almost certainly outweigh the risks of eating farm raised salmon, even salmon from Europe, particularly for people at high risk for heart disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC