For example the article discusses and links to a radio interview with Dr M.V. Ramana:
http://www.independentaustralia.net/2011/business/australia-under-nuclear-pressure/<snip>
There is much press coverage about how upset India is, about this. However, as it turns out, it is not all that important. According to Indian experts, such as Dr M.V. Ramana, who
spoke on the ABC ‘National Interest’ programme last week, this issue is “purely symbolic” — as India does not need Australia’s uranium, having its own supplies and several other countries who do export to India. Also, India’s grand nuclear future doesn’t look too bright as domestic opposition to new nuclear power plants is growing stronger all the time in the Republic.
Chillingly, Professor Ramana reminds us that by selling uranium to India, Australia would promote its nuclear weapons development, in that Australian uranium for “peaceful” purposes would simply free up India’s uranium for its weapons program.
But now, Australia is coming under intense pressure from the U.S.A. to change its policy on uranium sales to India. Why? Well, the U.S. was foremost in the pressure on the Nuclear Suppliers Group to grant the exemptions that now permit sale of nuclear technology to India. The U.S. is intently pushing India to change its Nuclear Liability Law — to enable technology sales to India.
Yes, it comes back to the USA’s determination to make money out of nuclear technology. While USA’s domestic nuclear industry founders – unable to get investment for new nuclear reactors – its big hope is in selling nuclear technology to “developing” countries — India, China, anybody!
<snip>
If you follow the embedded link in the article you go to the radio website which has transcripts and audio:
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/nationalinterest/day 11 November 2011
Listen Now Download Audio (25.0 MB) 18:10 The round-up - listen download
18:15 If mining loses its boom - listen download
18:30 Uranium exports: the India conundrum Transcript listen download
18:45 The fight for the right to repair - listen download
19:00 Feedback - listen download
Follow the transcript link and you'll find that Ramana also quotes other people:
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/nationalinterest/stories/2011/3362894.htm#transcript11 November 2011
Uranium exports: the India conundrum
listen now download audio
<snip>
Pakistan has vowed that it is going to try and match India to the extent that it can. It's expanding its plutonium production capacity because India is doing this. They've stated repeatedly that the energy neighbours had propelled it to sort of expand its nuclear fissile material production.
Those are the facts on the table. Now it's for Australia to decide whether they want to add fuel to this process, as it were.
<snip>
Right. The Nuclear Suppliers Group is a body that works on consensus. Now, we know from all accounts that there were huge differences of opinion within the group about whether India should be given a special waiver or not. And we also know from all public records that the United States and France and Russia, which were looking to get reactor sales, put a huge amount of pressure on every country that was opposing it.
And then Jayantha Dhanapala, the former United Nations Undersecretary General for Disarmament Affairs, described what the United States and other countries did as a 'campaign of brutal and unconscionable pressure.' So this was not some kind of a very goodhearted decision where everybody said, 'Oh, India's such a great country, we need to sell things to them.'
<snip>
And the hope was that by importing uranium from other countries to be used in safeguarded reactors, India could free up its own domestic uranium reserves for use in its nuclear weapons program. And this was an opinion that was registered by, among others, K Subrahmanyam, the former head of the National Security Advisory Board of India, who argued that given India's uranium ??? and the need to build up our nuclear deterrent arsenal as fast as possible, it is to India's advantage to categorise as many power reactors as possible as civilian ones to be refuelled by imported uranium and conserve our native uranium fuel for weapons-grade plutonium production.
<snip>
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
